Oakton Freshman Football

[Anonymous]

Um so 2 boys were caught being inappropriate in the locker room

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Um so 2 boys were caught being inappropriate in the locker room

That's not the impression prior posts are conveying.

[Anonymous]

Let me guess Reid is going to do an internal investigation and say there was no evidence and then hire an independent firm to do an investigation as well.

And “horseplay” wouldn’t get a freshmen football program shut down, especially before an investigation was completed. Something pretty significant must have happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From what I've heard, it's not sexual assault per se but unfortunate, ridiculous horseplay (as 9th grade boys do...SIGH) involving a specific body part. It's stupidity, for sure.

That said, I, too, would have reported it or would have told my son to report it to the coaching staff to prevent a recurrence.

Wrong, it absolutely was a sexual assault. Stop downplaying it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From what I've heard, it's not sexual assault per se but unfortunate, ridiculous horseplay (as 9th grade boys do...SIGH) involving a specific body part. It's stupidity, for sure.

That said, I, too, would have reported it or would have told my son to report it to the coaching staff to prevent a recurrence.

THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT. Stop with the boys will be boys excuses. Sexual assault is sexual assault, regardless of the "intent".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From what I've heard, it's not sexual assault per se but unfortunate, ridiculous horseplay (as 9th grade boys do...SIGH) involving a specific body part. It's stupidity, for sure.

That said, I, too, would have reported it or would have told my son to report it to the coaching staff to prevent a recurrence.

THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT. Stop with the boys will be boys excuses. Sexual assault is sexual assault, regardless of the "intent".

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let me guess Reid is going to do an internal investigation and say there was no evidence and then hire an independent firm to do an investigation as well.

And “horseplay” wouldn’t get a freshmen football program shut down, especially before an investigation was completed. Something pretty significant must have happened.

💯

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Um so 2 boys were caught being inappropriate in the locker room

I have heard the story but will not post details however this is not what happened. There is a victim and a perpetrator. Not two boys goofing around. For the sake of the victim, I think it's time to put the topic to rest on here.

[Anonymous]

If there is a single perpetrator why wasn’t he kicked off the team rather than canceling the entire season?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If there is a single perpetrator why wasn’t he kicked off the team rather than canceling the entire season?

I think both happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The season is over thanks to one kid.

So, is it a kid who did the deed (whatever that is) or the kid who squealed/accused?

Squealed? He was a victim of a sexual assault you a$$hole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The season is over thanks to one kid.

So, is it a kid who did the deed (whatever that is) or the kid who squealed/accused?

Squealed? He was a victim of a sexual assault you a$$hole.

1. I was responding to the question about "thanks to one kid." And, a "squealer" is not necessarily the victim.
2. When I asked the question, we did not know what the accusation was. There were pages of speculation. We still do not know--except for what someone has posted here on DCUM.

Honestly, if it was only two kids--perp and victim--I don't understand cancelling the season.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The season is over thanks to one kid.

So, is it a kid who did the deed (whatever that is) or the kid who squealed/accused?

Squealed? He was a victim of a sexual assault you a$$hole.

1. I was responding to the question about "thanks to one kid." And, a "squealer" is not necessarily the victim.
2. When I asked the question, we did not know what the accusation was. There were pages of speculation. We still do not know--except for what someone has posted here on DCUM.

Honestly, if it was only two kids--perp and victim--I don't understand cancelling the season.

Squeal implies that it was wrong to tell - it has a negative connotation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The season is over thanks to one kid.

So, is it a kid who did the deed (whatever that is) or the kid who squealed/accused?

Squealed? He was a victim of a sexual assault you a$$hole.

1. I was responding to the question about "thanks to one kid." And, a "squealer" is not necessarily the victim.
2. When I asked the question, we did not know what the accusation was. There were pages of speculation. We still do not know--except for what someone has posted here on DCUM.

Honestly, if it was only two kids--perp and victim--I don't understand cancelling the season.

It was not only two kids. From what I understand, it was a hazing incident that went too far.

[Anonymous]

Why is there even hazing?