Diane Keaton passes at 79

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feel bad for her kids, only in their 20s.

Daughter is 29 and son is 25. Plenty of people have parents who died when they were younger than those ages!

While that’s true, it’s also true that it’s young overall to lose their parents. It’s not a competition of who had it worse. It’s totally appropriate for someone to feel bad for her kids in a thread about Diane Keaton’s young adult children.

Sure it's sad but, they are over 18 and had a great life with Diane, I'm sure. One should always think of other people to put things into perspective. My dad died when i was 14.

My mom died when I was 24 and it absolutely gutted me. I dont think we need to play the who had it worse game and no it is not necessary to put things into perspective to compare grief. Losing a parent sucks

That's your opinion but I have my opinion too and I have ever right to feel as I do. I am not saying it isn't sad or they aren't gutted. I'm not even saying it is a competition. I am saying they are much better off than they would have been if they had been under 18! And I have the right to my thoughts so fine if you disagree but I am not changing my mind!!!!

No, they are not better off since they are over 18.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feel bad for her kids, only in their 20s.

Daughter is 29 and son is 25. Plenty of people have parents who died when they were younger than those ages!

Yes. We are all different ages when our parenta die. Very hard for us all. I feel bad for us all when it happens.

[Anonymous]

This isn’t the grief Olympics! Let’s get back to talking about Diane.

[Anonymous]

I loved that her acting never ever seemed forced, and that she could access deep emotion. Diane Keaton never gave a try-hard performance.

I’m 51 and have always admired that she kept her style her whole life, and that she openly said she’d never been proposed to. She didn’t value herself nor seek to value other women on the basis of their romantic status or partnerships. She never ever seemed “old” to me and I know that’s because of her humor and lightness. I’ve always liked her and always will!

[Anonymous]

Loved baby boom as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feel bad for her kids, only in their 20s.

Daughter is 29 and son is 25. Plenty of people have parents who died when they were younger than those ages!

While that’s true, it’s also true that it’s young overall to lose their parents. It’s not a competition of who had it worse. It’s totally appropriate for someone to feel bad for her kids in a thread about Diane Keaton’s young adult children.

Sure it's sad but, they are over 18 and had a great life with Diane, I'm sure. One should always think of other people to put things into perspective. My dad died when i was 14.

My mom died when I was 24 and it absolutely gutted me. I dont think we need to play the who had it worse game and no it is not necessary to put things into perspective to compare grief. Losing a parent sucks

That's your opinion but I have my opinion too and I have ever right to feel as I do. I am not saying it isn't sad or they aren't gutted. I'm not even saying it is a competition. I am saying they are much better off than they would have been if they had been under 18! And I have the right to my thoughts so fine if you disagree but I am not changing my mind!!!!

No, they are not better off since they are over 18.

It is better this age than 5 and 10. Are you like this in real life? Lacking critical thinking skills?

[Anonymous]

Baby Boom was my comfort movie. Whenever it was on I would just sit and watch. Loved Diane Keaton. This is sad news.

[Anonymous]

She dated many of her a-list stars, but never married

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t the grief Olympics! Let’s get back to talking about Diane.

If you would stop responding to my specific post and say something else we could. But you can't resist.

Here is my attempt:

I loved her work and her style. Aren't we lucky we have so many movies to watch?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She dated many of her a-list stars, but never married[/quote]

Smart woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feel bad for her kids, only in their 20s.

Daughter is 29 and son is 25. Plenty of people have parents who died when they were younger than those ages!

While that’s true, it’s also true that it’s young overall to lose their parents. It’s not a competition of who had it worse. It’s totally appropriate for someone to feel bad for her kids in a thread about Diane Keaton’s young adult children.

Sure it's sad but, they are over 18 and had a great life with Diane, I'm sure. One should always think of other people to put things into perspective. My dad died when i was 14.

My mom died when I was 24 and it absolutely gutted me. I dont think we need to play the who had it worse game and no it is not necessary to put things into perspective to compare grief. Losing a parent sucks

That's your opinion but I have my opinion too and I have ever right to feel as I do. I am not saying it isn't sad or they aren't gutted. I'm not even saying it is a competition. I am saying they are much better off than they would have been if they had been under 18! And I have the right to my thoughts so fine if you disagree but I am not changing my mind!!!!

No, they are not better off since they are over 18.

It is better this age than 5 and 10. Are you like this in real life? Lacking critical thinking skills?

You are wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feel bad for her kids, only in their 20s.

Daughter is 29 and son is 25. Plenty of people have parents who died when they were younger than those ages!

While that’s true, it’s also true that it’s young overall to lose their parents. It’s not a competition of who had it worse. It’s totally appropriate for someone to feel bad for her kids in a thread about Diane Keaton’s young adult children.

Sure it's sad but, they are over 18 and had a great life with Diane, I'm sure. One should always think of other people to put things into perspective. My dad died when i was 14.

My mom died when I was 24 and it absolutely gutted me. I dont think we need to play the who had it worse game and no it is not necessary to put things into perspective to compare grief. Losing a parent sucks

That's your opinion but I have my opinion too and I have ever right to feel as I do. I am not saying it isn't sad or they aren't gutted. I'm not even saying it is a competition. I am saying they are much better off than they would have been if they had been under 18! And I have the right to my thoughts so fine if you disagree but I am not changing my mind!!!!

No, they are not better off since they are over 18.

It is better this age than 5 and 10. Are you like this in real life? Lacking critical thinking skills?

You are wrong.

NP. Losing a parent when you are under 18 is seen as more difficult and more tragic because you are still a child, dependent on adults, and didn’t get as long to get to know your parent and make memories. Longer time you get with your parent = more love, more memories.

I fear this is common sense my friend. Cant believe im explaining something so basic.

RIP Diane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Loved baby boom as well.

+1
I will always remember that beautiful baby, Elizabeth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In The Family Stone, there's a pregnant sister - is she the same actress who played the pregnant woman on Grey's Anatomy who was in the ferry explosion that Alex helped and then fell for, only to find she was crazy?

What does that have to do with Diane Keaton?

Um, Diane Keaton was IN The Family Stone, duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feel bad for her kids, only in their 20s.

Daughter is 29 and son is 25. Plenty of people have parents who died when they were younger than those ages!

While that’s true, it’s also true that it’s young overall to lose their parents. It’s not a competition of who had it worse. It’s totally appropriate for someone to feel bad for her kids in a thread about Diane Keaton’s young adult children.

Sure it's sad but, they are over 18 and had a great life with Diane, I'm sure. One should always think of other people to put things into perspective. My dad died when i was 14.

My mom died when I was 24 and it absolutely gutted me. I dont think we need to play the who had it worse game and no it is not necessary to put things into perspective to compare grief. Losing a parent sucks

That's your opinion but I have my opinion too and I have ever right to feel as I do. I am not saying it isn't sad or they aren't gutted. I'm not even saying it is a competition. I am saying they are much better off than they would have been if they had been under 18! And I have the right to my thoughts so fine if you disagree but I am not changing my mind!!!!

No, they are not better off since they are over 18.

It is better this age than 5 and 10. Are you like this in real life? Lacking critical thinking skills?

You are wrong.

NP. Losing a parent when you are under 18 is seen as more difficult and more tragic because you are still a child, dependent on adults, and didn’t get as long to get to know your parent and make memories. Longer time you get with your parent = more love, more memories.

I fear this is common sense my friend. Cant believe im explaining something so basic.

RIP Diane.

No.