B-CC HS News Article: Have you seen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dr Mooney requested an exemption to NOT attend the school safety meeting. His bosses granted it. Mooney was the one who refused to go. Moran was protecting Mooney’s privacy, as he is required to do, and Mooney threw Moran under the bus.

Mooney sent this message to staff last night: “As the principal, I also need to set the record straight on several items…*With regards to the recent safety community meeting held at B-CC by Councilman Friedson, at no point was I directed not to attend the meeting but instead expressed a preference not to attend due to a prior commitment which my supervisors supported”.

Dr Mooney has been proven to have repeatedly lied to Central Office and to have lied about Central Office to his staff. He has lied about basic safety issues. He has repeatedly refused to enforce bullying protocols when the victims of the bullying are students of color or Jewish students. Those are only some of the issues here. If some teachers want to support that, it’s their right. But not everyone would agree with that choice.

That's is why you take anything you read on DCUM with a grain of salt.
DCUM is full of ....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dr Mooney requested an exemption to NOT attend the school safety meeting. His bosses granted it. Mooney was the one who refused to go. Moran was protecting Mooney’s privacy, as he is required to do, and Mooney threw Moran under the bus.

Mooney sent this message to staff last night: “As the principal, I also need to set the record straight on several items…*With regards to the recent safety community meeting held at B-CC by Councilman Friedson, at no point was I directed not to attend the meeting but instead expressed a preference not to attend due to a prior commitment which my supervisors supported”.

Dr Mooney has been proven to have repeatedly lied to Central Office and to have lied about Central Office to his staff. He has lied about basic safety issues. He has repeatedly refused to enforce bullying protocols when the victims of the bullying are students of color or Jewish students. Those are only some of the issues here. If some teachers want to support that, it’s their right. But not everyone would agree with that choice.

It's interesting to me that even after getting this message that was sent to staff last night, teachers would be telling students today that Mooney was being scapegoated, which is what students are hearing at BCC.

[Anonymous]

The B-CC teachers who were so busy caping for Mooney and insisting he was told not to come to the meeting look very stupid now. This is why they should have kept their mouths shut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr Mooney requested an exemption to NOT attend the school safety meeting. His bosses granted it. Mooney was the one who refused to go. Moran was protecting Mooney’s privacy, as he is required to do, and Mooney threw Moran under the bus.

Mooney sent this message to staff last night: “As the principal, I also need to set the record straight on several items…*With regards to the recent safety community meeting held at B-CC by Councilman Friedson, at no point was I directed not to attend the meeting but instead expressed a preference not to attend due to a prior commitment which my supervisors supported”.

Dr Mooney has been proven to have repeatedly lied to Central Office and to have lied about Central Office to his staff. He has lied about basic safety issues. He has repeatedly refused to enforce bullying protocols when the victims of the bullying are students of color or Jewish students. Those are only some of the issues here. If some teachers want to support that, it’s their right. But not everyone would agree with that choice.

That's is why you take anything you read on DCUM with a grain of salt.
DCUM is full of ....

So allegedly Mo2s both lied?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The B-CC teachers who were so busy caping for Mooney and insisting he was told not to come to the meeting look very stupid now. This is why they should have kept their mouths shut.

There's a lot of teachers in HS. Obviously there's going to be different views.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr Mooney requested an exemption to NOT attend the school safety meeting. His bosses granted it. Mooney was the one who refused to go. Moran was protecting Mooney’s privacy, as he is required to do, and Mooney threw Moran under the bus.

Mooney sent this message to staff last night: “As the principal, I also need to set the record straight on several items…*With regards to the recent safety community meeting held at B-CC by Councilman Friedson, at no point was I directed not to attend the meeting but instead expressed a preference not to attend due to a prior commitment which my supervisors supported”.

Dr Mooney has been proven to have repeatedly lied to Central Office and to have lied about Central Office to his staff. He has lied about basic safety issues. He has repeatedly refused to enforce bullying protocols when the victims of the bullying are students of color or Jewish students. Those are only some of the issues here. If some teachers want to support that, it’s their right. But not everyone would agree with that choice.

It's interesting to me that even after getting this message that was sent to staff last night, teachers would be telling students today that Mooney was being scapegoated, which is what students are hearing at BCC.

And apparently that if you hold the door, there's harsher consequences? Also, a new bell for alerts?? Was that true? Do all High schools have this now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BCC parent here. The piece is written by a BCC teacher. I'm not surprised by his allegation; obviously *someone* from the school would have come unless they were specifically told not to.

And I'm in the minority here, but I think the parent witch hunt against the principal is absurd. How is the principal of a school with 2200 kids going to prevent a fight from happening in a park a few blocks away during school hours? Should he be personally hunting down every kid who is absent to make sure they're not playing Jets and Sharks in the park? How is any administrator responsible for the fact that some half-wit brought an AirSoft gun in his backpack to show off?

Obviously there are real problems that need real solutions. But if you think that pushing out the principal is the answer, take a look at the rest of MCPS.

The blame is the politicians who have made rules that say teens csnt ve arrested unless they hurt someone. We had truancy laws. The police were free to pick kids up and detain them back in the day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr Mooney requested an exemption to NOT attend the school safety meeting. His bosses granted it. Mooney was the one who refused to go. Moran was protecting Mooney’s privacy, as he is required to do, and Mooney threw Moran under the bus.

Mooney sent this message to staff last night: “As the principal, I also need to set the record straight on several items…*With regards to the recent safety community meeting held at B-CC by Councilman Friedson, at no point was I directed not to attend the meeting but instead expressed a preference not to attend due to a prior commitment which my supervisors supported”.

Dr Mooney has been proven to have repeatedly lied to Central Office and to have lied about Central Office to his staff. He has lied about basic safety issues. He has repeatedly refused to enforce bullying protocols when the victims of the bullying are students of color or Jewish students. Those are only some of the issues here. If some teachers want to support that, it’s their right. But not everyone would agree with that choice.

It's interesting to me that even after getting this message that was sent to staff last night, teachers would be telling students today that Mooney was being scapegoated, which is what students are hearing at BCC.

And apparently that if you hold the door, there's harsher consequences? Also, a new bell for alerts?? Was that true? Do all High schools have this now?

I mean, opening the doors and letting people in are a safety issue 😅

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr Mooney requested an exemption to NOT attend the school safety meeting. His bosses granted it. Mooney was the one who refused to go. Moran was protecting Mooney’s privacy, as he is required to do, and Mooney threw Moran under the bus.

Mooney sent this message to staff last night: “As the principal, I also need to set the record straight on several items…*With regards to the recent safety community meeting held at B-CC by Councilman Friedson, at no point was I directed not to attend the meeting but instead expressed a preference not to attend due to a prior commitment which my supervisors supported”.

Dr Mooney has been proven to have repeatedly lied to Central Office and to have lied about Central Office to his staff. He has lied about basic safety issues. He has repeatedly refused to enforce bullying protocols when the victims of the bullying are students of color or Jewish students. Those are only some of the issues here. If some teachers want to support that, it’s their right. But not everyone would agree with that choice.

It's interesting to me that even after getting this message that was sent to staff last night, teachers would be telling students today that Mooney was being scapegoated, which is what students are hearing at BCC.

And apparently that if you hold the door, there's harsher consequences? Also, a new bell for alerts?? Was that true? Do all High schools have this now?

I mean, opening the doors and letting people in are a safety issue 😅

Obvi safety issue. The key word was harsher..should have bolded that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have people seen this news article about B-CC High School?

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/03/16/opinion-bethesda-chevy-chase-high-administrators-shouldnt-be-scapegoats/

It is strange that they were directed not to attend, undermining their authority.

It speaks volumes that the principal was directed not to attend. I believe that the BCC HS principal job will be posting shortly.

I presume this is mere speculation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr Mooney requested an exemption to NOT attend the school safety meeting. His bosses granted it. Mooney was the one who refused to go. Moran was protecting Mooney’s privacy, as he is required to do, and Mooney threw Moran under the bus.

Mooney sent this message to staff last night: “As the principal, I also need to set the record straight on several items…*With regards to the recent safety community meeting held at B-CC by Councilman Friedson, at no point was I directed not to attend the meeting but instead expressed a preference not to attend due to a prior commitment which my supervisors supported”.

Dr Mooney has been proven to have repeatedly lied to Central Office and to have lied about Central Office to his staff. He has lied about basic safety issues. He has repeatedly refused to enforce bullying protocols when the victims of the bullying are students of color or Jewish students. Those are only some of the issues here. If some teachers want to support that, it’s their right. But not everyone would agree with that choice.

It's interesting to me that even after getting this message that was sent to staff last night, teachers would be telling students today that Mooney was being scapegoated, which is what students are hearing at BCC.

And apparently that if you hold the door, there's harsher consequences? Also, a new bell for alerts?? Was that true? Do all High schools have this now?

I mean, opening the doors and letting people in are a safety issue 😅

Obvi safety issue. The key word was harsher..should have bolded that.

Which is...suspensions?
Let the door slam on your bff Larlo??
Sorry Larla I like you but can't be a gentleman here at the school holding the door?

[Anonymous]

Have the changes Moran stated in his letter started? Any positive effects that you have seen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have the changes Moran stated in his letter started? Any positive effects that you have seen?

Who will be present at your meeting, Wootton?