
That seems to be a contradiction. |
What on earth? Many African Americans support Trump. Many LGBTQ support Trump. You really do love in a bubble. |
To be clear, are you saying that in your opinion people should embrace those who openly tell you they are racist? Sexist? OK with rapists in power? Or do you disagree that these are correct descriptions of Trump? |
And you don’t think that people can support a presidential candidate for reasons completely unrelated to those things? Like maybe they prefer his substantive policies? Should they vote for someone whose politics are completely different than their own just because some Liberals have tried to brand Trump a sexist and a racist (which he is not)? |
^^By the way, did you vote for Clinton? Because that guy was a real sexual predator. |
I'm asking for clarification of your comment. |
Wow! Are you part of the book banning crowd or the Robin Hood crowd? Either way YOU are the problem with polarization in society. |
We live far away from DC in a mostly politically liberal community outside of Portland. I don’t check parents’ backgrounds unless I have a reason to- like offhanded racist comments from a kid or casually dropping a really uninclusive comment about a school event. And then I Google the crap out of the parents.
A girl was being a real jerk to my kid and her mom kept making weird comments at school pickup. I finally looked up the family and they are a former tobacco lobbyist and a current Republican lobbyist and someone who runs a shady super PAC. No idea how they ended up out here. it gave me good reason to tell my DD that she didn’t have to work extra hard to have neutral interactions with the mean girl and could just avoid her. |
I’m a DP. But if you want my opinion, the points you raised are not particularly relevant in a presidential election. They weren’t relevant when the Republicans impeached Clinton, and they’re not relevant now. We have bigger problems in this country than the invented ones you are desperately hanging onto. How about you engage on real issues, not woke fantasies. |
I am comfortable with my children being around Republicans. That's not a problem for me. We have policy differences, but have the same end goal in mind. McCain, Kaisich, Romney, fine. When they ran I wasn't going to vote for them, but they had policy positions I could argue against.
However, that's not who is running that party right now, and I'd be concerned having my kid play with the kids of Trump supporters. The parents are okay with so many things that aren't just a difference of policy. They might not be advocating for racism, sexism, anti-LGBTQ, assault, and just a true dislike of people in general...but they aren't discouraging it either. I don't want that messaging around my kids. |
You are intolerant. |
This thread is why many in our country are registered as closet Democrats but vote Republican. |
The intolerance in this thread particularly when it comes to young children is unbelievable. |
I should have noted I'm an NP, only the immediately prior question is mine. So, I see, you don't believe he committed any of these acts and that none of his policies lean this way eihter. Taht does clarify where you are coming from, and I suppose I just wish you would do better research. As to your question of me, yes, I do believe people may choose to overlook a person's character and vote for their policies, but I also think there is a definite limit to that for me. Throughout history we have judged candidates both on their policies and on their character. The entire attack on Hilary Clinton was character based, and many voters have said had they known about the affairs they would not have voted for Bill. Throughout history, candidates have withdrawn from races because of questions of moral turpitude and national security risk skeletons on the closet that were revealed. Trump has had so much of this baggage from the start that he was never an appropriate candidate in my opinion, no matter what his policies may have been, and then he proved to me by his behavior in office that I was correct. As it happens, I also disagree with his policies (to the extent he is able to articulate any; mostly they have to be extrapolated from past practices and from what his backers say). I do believe that the character of the person in office, especially their trustworthiness and sanity, is much more important than the policies they campaign on, because we all know that there is a Congress to deal with, and checks and balances in government, before anyone makes any major policies changes. But a person of poor character, who does not believe in those checks and balances, is dangerous and can do a lot of damage. So yes, when we vote we are, and we must be, taking into account the person, not just the policies. |
Homophobia? Give me a break. It’s not 1955 anymore. |