Nonsense. I only date men without kids. I am not accomodating other kids' schedules. I am not remarrying...and if on the off chance I did, it would be a younger man who does not want kids. I would never do a "blended family." I got divorced not to be married to that one person. I did not do it thinking I was going to have a do-over. Dating a man with kids would be the worst thing for everyone. Absolutely not. |
A lot of moms I know don’t put the kids first. They pretend to but don’t. |
If I ever divorce I will try to get no cohabitating with another adult until the kids are out of the house into the agreement. |
Rolling my eyes. That's not enforceable. God, so many divorced women feel entitled to control the man they divorced post divorce. He's not your husband. You don't get to boss him around anymore. On his custody time, he gets to do what he wants. |
Not divorced. But this is what putting the kids first would look like. I would obviously agree to it too. |
Of course YOU would. You're the woman. You couldn't make HIM abide by it. It doesn't matter even if you both agree to it in the agreement. It's not enforceable. |
He was standing behind her on the elliptical, showing her how it works. Then BOOM: baby. |
Blended families are highly overrated. In the vast majority of cases, kids from both sides have some degree of unresolved issues stemming from divorce or death of a parent, and it is the RARE family that does a good job of addressing those. There's this imagined ideal of a blended family coming together because the families mesh and it makes sense. The reality is that these arrangements are forced on kids by the adults who want to marry or cohabitate with a new partner, it's an inherently self-interested choice that people try to convince their kids is not that bad or even a positive. In reality, those kids would almost always benefit from that parent focusing on them for, at a minimum, several years post-divorce. The one exception is sadly when a parent is completely inept and benefits from the new relationship by bringing a functional parent into the household who will actually parent or provide a good parenting role model. But this is rare -- usually like attracts like and if one parent is a mess, so is the other, and the issues are just compounded. |
I think it's incorrect to say men don't want more kids if they're able to land hot young women. Generally, they are attracted to a much younger woman in part because she represents a do-over. Also, men with considerable means can still date younger women, even ones with good careers. I'd define considerable as over $1m in income per year. Their selling point is they are established, housebroken, and happy to settle and have a second family if the right situation presents itself. That said, the struggles are real. Theyllbe pulled in seperwte directions and won't have enough time to make everyone happy. |
I don't have kids, but my dad was a single dad (widow).
So really OP, "never" is a strong word. You think I have no idea what my dad dealt with as a single dad? |
I’m a single dad and date younger women without kids. I prefer that. They have more open schedules, no BD drama, no ex popping back up in their lives. They make you a priority too. If you’re dating a single mom you’re after her kid, her dog, her ex-husband, her house etc…you’ll never be close to being priority for time.
Younger women have their own set of issues but it far outweighs single moms |
+1 that is not enforceable. |
I said I would never do a blended family. |
Then you agree to it outside a legal document knowing it can change. It is not enforceable in agreement. We have this verbal agreement…it has been years. Unlikely to change but I know it could. |