ECNL Girls National Playoffs/Finals 2025 Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

All of these ECNL kids get recruited. It’s still a lot of fun to win and compete. Not everything is about a scholarship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

Its an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

You’re probably great at parties. Lots of fun. Get a hobby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

So you are telling us college coaches can name the highest ranked youth teams? Which age groups? Even U13-15? I call BS. What they can tell you is which are the best clubs which is part track record, part relationships, and part branding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

So you are telling us college coaches can name the highest ranked youth teams? Which age groups? Even U13-15? I call BS. What they can tell you is which are the best clubs which is part track record, part relationships, and part branding.

The ranking app is just as free for recruiters and coaches as it is for you.

Yes, guaranteed that they're looking at it. Just like theyre looking at multiple other sources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

So you are telling us college coaches can name the highest ranked youth teams? Which age groups? Even U13-15? I call BS. What they can tell you is which are the best clubs which is part track record, part relationships, and part branding.

The ranking app is just as free for recruiters and coaches as it is for you.

Yes, guaranteed that they're looking at it. Just like theyre looking at multiple other sources.

How exactly does a college recruiter make use of the team’s ranking when evaluating players? A college will have dozens of players on their board. You really think they consider the team ranking when deciding which players to make offers to or scholarship amounts?

“I really like this player and think they will be a great fit but their team is ranked lower so we’ll take the other player who doesn’t start but their team made it to the final 4 at U15”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

BS, keep lying and selling your trash. Saw a post of player from a NC team that finished 9 or 10 in MA Conference, she committed to Wake Forest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

BS, keep lying and selling your trash. Saw a post of player from a NC team that finished 9 or 10 in MA Conference, she committed to Wake Forest.

She’s probably the best player on that team, right?

The people on this forum have really managed to turn local teams advancing to the elite eight as a negative. Sweet 16 is a failure too. What’s worth celebrating? A national championship? The only team that gets to be happy about their year is the one team that wins a national championship in each group?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

So you are telling us college coaches can name the highest ranked youth teams? Which age groups? Even U13-15? I call BS. What they can tell you is which are the best clubs which is part track record, part relationships, and part branding.

The ranking app is just as free for recruiters and coaches as it is for you.

Yes, guaranteed that they're looking at it. Just like theyre looking at multiple other sources.

How exactly does a college recruiter make use of the team’s ranking when evaluating players? A college will have dozens of players on their board. You really think they consider the team ranking when deciding which players to make offers to or scholarship amounts?

“I really like this player and think they will be a great fit but their team is ranked lower so we’ll take the other player who doesn’t start but their team made it to the final 4 at U15”

Here's how a recruiter or coach makes use of the ranking app. A player contacts them about being a part of their team from a club theyre not that familiar with. First thing they'll do is checkout the club and team ranking to get a feel for if the player is worth spending time on.

Seems pretty logical to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

So you are telling us college coaches can name the highest ranked youth teams? Which age groups? Even U13-15? I call BS. What they can tell you is which are the best clubs which is part track record, part relationships, and part branding.

The ranking app is just as free for recruiters and coaches as it is for you.

Yes, guaranteed that they're looking at it. Just like theyre looking at multiple other sources.

How exactly does a college recruiter make use of the team’s ranking when evaluating players? A college will have dozens of players on their board. You really think they consider the team ranking when deciding which players to make offers to or scholarship amounts?

“I really like this player and think they will be a great fit but their team is ranked lower so we’ll take the other player who doesn’t start but their team made it to the final 4 at U15”

Here's how a recruiter or coach makes use of the ranking app. A player contacts them about being a part of their team from a club theyre not that familiar with. First thing they'll do is checkout the club and team ranking to get a feel for if the player is worth spending time on.

Seems pretty logical to me.

+100 - it's just another piece of data (that happens to be pretty helpful).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll be surprised if VDA doesn’t win titles in 1 or 2 age groups given the amount of talent they have consolidated. Expectations are high.

Well, well where is your local champion? Even after pulling many players from other clubs with cheap propaganda, 0 VDA teams made to Finals.

One team in the final four. One team in the final eight. One team in the 16.

Sounds like a pretty good year to me. Let’s keep the cheap propaganda rolling.

The funny thing is how many parents think getting to the final 4, 8, or 16 is meaningful for their daughter getting recruited or a scholarship. That’s why the clubs will promote the hell out of it on social.

Tell the parent of the kid who traveled all the way to SD and Richmond just to show up on the pic and social media but who didn’t actually play.

Exactly, playoffs attracts recruiters. Finals doesnt attract that many recruiters. If theres only 8 teams there's just not much reason for them to go. Especially right after playoffs.

The only thing that matters is national champion, maybe runner up, and ranking. Everyone else is speaking to recruiters the same way.

It’s an expensive way for parents to make clubs look good. Honesty the more I think about it clubs should be funding teams travel expenses as a thank you for making it to finals.

From a recruiting perspective, being national champion, runner up, and certainly not ranking matter. What matters is how you market yourself and play when they are watching. If a college coach thinks you are good and can fill a need on the team, he/she isn’t going to choose or not choose you based on team rank or how far the team made it in playoffs. Your play on the field, on film, attitude, grades, interactions will all be assessed but they do not care about the team’s results. There are plenty of showcase opportunities in ECNL throughout the year for a good player to get enough looks. And no coach is going to overlook a player who doesn’t impress them just because they are on a winning team.

Try this...

In 2 weeks ask someone who's into youth soccer what team was the runner up in xyz age in abc league.

Now ask them who are the top ranked teams in an age group.

9x out of 10 and the tenth being a parent with a kid on the runner up team nobody will remember who the runner up is. But I bet most parents that are into youth soccer can name the highest ranked teams. Coaches and recruiters are the same way. Events like playoffs and finals are fine but ranking has a more long lasting impression.

So you are telling us college coaches can name the highest ranked youth teams? Which age groups? Even U13-15? I call BS. What they can tell you is which are the best clubs which is part track record, part relationships, and part branding.

The ranking app is just as free for recruiters and coaches as it is for you.

Yes, guaranteed that they're looking at it. Just like theyre looking at multiple other sources.

How exactly does a college recruiter make use of the team’s ranking when evaluating players? A college will have dozens of players on their board. You really think they consider the team ranking when deciding which players to make offers to or scholarship amounts?

“I really like this player and think they will be a great fit but their team is ranked lower so we’ll take the other player who doesn’t start but their team made it to the final 4 at U15”

Here's how a recruiter or coach makes use of the ranking app. A player contacts them about being a part of their team from a club theyre not that familiar with. First thing they'll do is checkout the club and team ranking to get a feel for if the player is worth spending time on.

Seems pretty logical to me.

Seems logical unless you actually know how recruiting works. First of all, college coaches will not be unfamiliar with any club that is in ECNL. Second, when a player contacts them they should be including film. Coach will watch the film and decide if something stands out. If so then they will watch them live.

Ranking tells them nothing about the player. Maybe they ride the bench.

Next thing you’ll say is college coaches are impressed by the talent ID accolades on the player bio 😂