Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM Nostradamus, I like your posts. What say you about the rehab/ED theory?

I'm still here - Reading. Reviewing my sources. Processing.

My views are that - like many celebrity women - she probably has an ED in the form of restrictive diet/picky eater, aka Softgirl 'rexia. But I'm not convinced its bulimia, feeding tube-required anorexia, or that it's the source of her needed surgery. It's a theory, but at the end of the day its idle speculation from the terminally-online peanut gallery.

And if it was ED + rehab, I think KP and William would be taking a different posture when it comes to communications strategy. He'd be out front a bit more with the kids, IMHO. And they wouldn't have put out the comically bad Photoshop'd picture.


The fact that the kids are cloistered leads me to believe marriage troubles are at the heart of the matter. And she's not cooperating with KP and William.

This works for me. The ED explains the pre-Christmas extreme skinniness.

To me at least, the fantasists’ picture of Kate not wanting to be seen with more weight also explains the awful photoshop job, whether Kate did it herself or KP had to do it because she wasn’t cooperating on a new picture.

But it doesn’t explain KP throwing her under the bus, or William’s apparent lack of sympathy. For those questions you need another explanation, and marital discord answers them.

Do we know whether Will is visiting her at Anmer Hall?

Open to other explanations (well not from the tween that thinks she’s funny).

Where are people getting that Will is throwing her under the bus or being unsympathetic, without first assuming marriage issues? If you look at it objectively, Will's weird behavior, not bringing her up as much etc could just be a sign of distress, assuming she is mentally unstable at the moment.

To me the biggest thing is making Catherine take the fall for the stupid photoshop incident. That's bananas. They could have said "a staffer made an unfortunate error" instead of making her look ridiculous. But William also didn't visit her and reports of their marriage difficulties are not new, at all. And come on, marriages are always hard. Divorce is common.

agreed about them blaming it on her. The BBC gave them a way out by saying it was an overzealous staffer. Mistakes happen and we know other people are editing these pics

And has they done that you still would be upset. Claiming they lied and how classist of them to blame a subordinate and don't they have the final say?


Just admit you want them to divorce.

Agree. Kate took ownership and apologized. Seemed like a decent response to me. But posters are just itching for her to get dumped by William. William, who, whether he has cheated or not, is taking care of her now and shows no sign of leaving her.

Do you really think you are going to trick us into feeling bad for talkinga about this topic. Why would those of us talking about it care what you think?

Oh, by the way, someone else edited the pictures, someone else made Kate the fall guy for the editing. You are making up the scenario that people on DCUM are calling for her to get dumped. You don't know if he is caring for her or deciding not to leave her. You are speculating just like the rest of us. Also, the royal family doesn't care about you and doesn't care that you feel the strong need to defend their honor.

So the rest of us, let's keep talking!

You pulled that out of your butt hole.

Man. I’m gullible but even I can’t buy that Kate would do something so colossally stupid, or that a well-functioning PR team would let her take the fall for it.

+1. This is what I really don’t get about the princess fantasizers. No, all is not a Disney movie in Kate’s world and it’s not “caring” to keep pretending she’s in the Magic Kingdom.

It's ironic u keep calling people princess fantasizers because you're the only one doing it. All of us have been pointing out how this out.

[Anonymous]

Drama with a highbrow spin

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/13/opinion/kate-middleton-scandal.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM Nostradamus, I like your posts. What say you about the rehab/ED theory?

I'm still here - Reading. Reviewing my sources. Processing.

My views are that - like many celebrity women - she probably has an ED in the form of restrictive diet/picky eater, aka Softgirl 'rexia. But I'm not convinced its bulimia, feeding tube-required anorexia, or that it's the source of her needed surgery. It's a theory, but at the end of the day its idle speculation from the terminally-online peanut gallery.

And if it was ED + rehab, I think KP and William would be taking a different posture when it comes to communications strategy. He'd be out front a bit more with the kids, IMHO. And they wouldn't have put out the comically bad Photoshop'd picture.


The fact that the kids are cloistered leads me to believe marriage troubles are at the heart of the matter. And she's not cooperating with KP and William.

This works for me. The ED explains the pre-Christmas extreme skinniness.

To me at least, the fantasists’ picture of Kate not wanting to be seen with more weight also explains the awful photoshop job, whether Kate did it herself or KP had to do it because she wasn’t cooperating on a new picture.

But it doesn’t explain KP throwing her under the bus, or William’s apparent lack of sympathy. For those questions you need another explanation, and marital discord answers them.

Do we know whether Will is visiting her at Anmer Hall?

Open to other explanations (well not from the tween that thinks she’s funny).

Where are people getting that Will is throwing her under the bus or being unsympathetic, without first assuming marriage issues? If you look at it objectively, Will's weird behavior, not bringing her up as much etc could just be a sign of distress, assuming she is mentally unstable at the moment.

To me the biggest thing is making Catherine take the fall for the stupid photoshop incident. That's bananas. They could have said "a staffer made an unfortunate error" instead of making her look ridiculous. But William also didn't visit her and reports of their marriage difficulties are not new, at all. And come on, marriages are always hard. Divorce is common.

agreed about them blaming it on her. The BBC gave them a way out by saying it was an overzealous staffer. Mistakes happen and we know other people are editing these pics

And has they done that you still would be upset. Claiming they lied and how classist of them to blame a subordinate and don't they have the final say?


Just admit you want them to divorce.

Agree. Kate took ownership and apologized. Seemed like a decent response to me. But posters are just itching for her to get dumped by William. William, who, whether he has cheated or not, is taking care of her now and shows no sign of leaving her.

Do you really think you are going to trick us into feeling bad for talkinga about this topic. Why would those of us talking about it care what you think?

Oh, by the way, someone else edited the pictures, someone else made Kate the fall guy for the editing. You are making up the scenario that people on DCUM are calling for her to get dumped. You don't know if he is caring for her or deciding not to leave her. You are speculating just like the rest of us. Also, the royal family doesn't care about you and doesn't care that you feel the strong need to defend their honor.

So the rest of us, let's keep talking!

Man. I’m gullible but even I can’t buy that Kate would do something so colossally stupid, or that a well-functioning PR team would let her take the fall for it.

That's what leads to all this rubbernecking. The PR or BRF or KP or BP or whatever is just terrible at this -- after centuries of it being their only job.

[Anonymous]

This is interesting

https://www.newsweek.com/kate-middleton-secrecy-public-support-poll-1878241

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ambulance could've been required if she protested going to treatment and fought William which would explain the bruises. Eating disorders are physical and mental and that could be why they're throwing her under the bus in those recent articles.

It was a convoy of cars not an ambulance. The video is available to be seen and was even posted upthread.

What difference does it make? Even dying people can be transported to the hospital in a regular car (my point is not that she was dying, who knows, point is that there are many ways to get to a hospital)

Words and facts matter. A convoy of cars was seen going from the royal property to the hospital.

No "ambulance" was called so talk of one being called is ridiculous. Someone was taken to a hospital on the 28th, there has been no statement re: who or for what purpose. That is all factual.

Well duh. And people here are trying to suss out who was in the “convoy of cars” and why.

Clear now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ambulance could've been required if she protested going to treatment and fought William which would explain the bruises. Eating disorders are physical and mental and that could be why they're throwing her under the bus in those recent articles.

It was a convoy of cars not an ambulance. The video is available to be seen and was even posted upthread.

It drove to a hospital

Yes but an ambulance is a particular type of vehicle that was NOT part of the convoy.

Words and facts matter.

you are seeking to cause chaos on this thread so people will stop talking about the matter and/or the thread will be locked.

..I'm stating my opinion. This is not the nother forum where we all have to agree that William is evil and spew all sorts of hatred at them.

You were wrong in what you posted deal with it.

I will be fine if this thread is locked?

Will you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

How would you know?

Her BMI and taped fingers suggest she may well might.

Princess Michael of Kent called her an "avowed anorexic" years ago before they scrubbed it, so it's kind of ridiculous to think this is just SO impossible when there's been a concerted effort to quell any mention of it even when there were calls coming from inside the house.

And PM of K is a loon!

DCUM has this weird assumption that anyone who's thin (not just CM) is starving themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

How would you know?

Her BMI and taped fingers suggest she may well might.

Princess Michael of Kent called her an "avowed anorexic" years ago before they scrubbed it, so it's kind of ridiculous to think this is just SO impossible when there's been a concerted effort to quell any mention of it even when there were calls coming from inside the house.

THAT one seems to be a drinker with a poor filter.

The idea that she may need to have been hospitalized in early pregnancy to manage the ED makes some sense too.

Oh yeah, agreed. She's also the POS who wore a pretty racist pin when meeting Meghan. I don't think she's necessarily high character, but I think she's so high on her own petard she just kinda calls things like she sees them and doesn't play the game at ALL so there's a ring of truth to what she says and PR covers for her fast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Drama with a highbrow spin

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/13/opinion/kate-middleton-scandal.html

LOVE the calling out of Celia Walden, aka Mrs Piers Morgan. So many of them are just awful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting

https://www.newsweek.com/kate-middleton-secrecy-public-support-poll-1878241

Probably a sample of 3 respondents from KP.

[Anonymous]

Who cares if she edited the photo? Everyone does.
Why does it have to mean anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ambulance could've been required if she protested going to treatment and fought William which would explain the bruises. Eating disorders are physical and mental and that could be why they're throwing her under the bus in those recent articles.

It was a convoy of cars not an ambulance. The video is available to be seen and was even posted upthread.

What difference does it make? Even dying people can be transported to the hospital in a regular car (my point is not that she was dying, who knows, point is that there are many ways to get to a hospital)

Words and facts matter. A convoy of cars was seen going from the royal property to the hospital.

No "ambulance" was called so talk of one being called is ridiculous. Someone was taken to a hospital on the 28th, there has been no statement re: who or for what purpose. That is all factual.

Well duh. And people here are trying to suss out who was in the “convoy of cars” and why.

Clear now?

There is NO WAY to "suss" it out without a statement being released. "People here" don't have x ray vision into the cars. Do you fancy yourself Superwoman? What a bunch of low information posters on this site these days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM Nostradamus, I like your posts. What say you about the rehab/ED theory?

I'm still here - Reading. Reviewing my sources. Processing.

My views are that - like many celebrity women - she probably has an ED in the form of restrictive diet/picky eater, aka Softgirl 'rexia. But I'm not convinced its bulimia, feeding tube-required anorexia, or that it's the source of her needed surgery. It's a theory, but at the end of the day its idle speculation from the terminally-online peanut gallery.

And if it was ED + rehab, I think KP and William would be taking a different posture when it comes to communications strategy. He'd be out front a bit more with the kids, IMHO. And they wouldn't have put out the comically bad Photoshop'd picture.

The fact that the kids are cloistered leads me to believe marriage troubles are at the heart of the matter. And she's not cooperating with KP and William.

This works for me. The ED explains the pre-Christmas extreme skinniness.

To me at least, the fantasists’ picture of Kate not wanting to be seen with more weight also explains the awful photoshop job, whether Kate did it herself or KP had to do it because she wasn’t cooperating on a new picture.

But it doesn’t explain KP throwing her under the bus, or William’s apparent lack of sympathy. For those questions you need another explanation, and marital discord answers them.

Do we know whether Will is visiting her at Anmer Hall?

Open to other explanations (well not from the tween that thinks she’s funny).

Where are people getting that Will is throwing her under the bus or being unsympathetic, without first assuming marriage issues? If you look at it objectively, Will's weird behavior, not bringing her up as much etc could just be a sign of distress, assuming she is mentally unstable at the moment.

To me the biggest thing is making Catherine take the fall for the stupid photoshop incident. That's bananas. They could have said "a staffer made an unfortunate error" instead of making her look ridiculous. But William also didn't visit her and reports of their marriage difficulties are not new, at all. And come on, marriages are always hard. Divorce is common.

agreed about them blaming it on her. The BBC gave them a way out by saying it was an overzealous staffer. Mistakes happen and we know other people are editing these pics

And has they done that you still would be upset. Claiming they lied and how classist of them to blame a subordinate and don't they have the final say?


Just admit you want them to divorce.

Agree. Kate took ownership and apologized. Seemed like a decent response to me. But posters are just itching for her to get dumped by William. William, who, whether he has cheated or not, is taking care of her now and shows no sign of leaving her.

I’m the PP who was talking about the photo. I don’t want them to get divorced; I honestly very much like the fairy tale aspect of their relationship and I think that she has been a godsend for the royal family . But looking at all the circumstances right now, taken together things look bad for her.

The only thing you know is that she is out of commission for a few months for a health issue. Yes, that is not good.

Everything else is horse manure.

What they shared at the start. But some sociopaths needed more and this the twisted fantasies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is interesting

https://www.newsweek.com/kate-middleton-secrecy-public-support-poll-1878241

The survey question asked about the princess’ health, and whether enough or too little info had been released on that. The survey didn’t ask about photogate or where’s Will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

How would you know?

Her BMI and taped fingers suggest she may well might.

Princess Michael of Kent called her an "avowed anorexic" years ago before they scrubbed it, so it's kind of ridiculous to think this is just SO impossible when there's been a concerted effort to quell any mention of it even when there were calls coming from inside the house.

And PM of K is a loon!

DCUM has this weird assumption that anyone who's thin (not just CM) is starving themselves.

I'm a size 0 who doesn't diet and I have no problem believing Catherine starves herself.