Jury refuses to indict Sandwich Man and other Trump cop misadventures

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

It very clearly was.

Not according to the jury.

Jury nullification in DC does not change facts and is part the reason the criminal justice system in DC is so hopelessly broken.

No reasonable person thinks this was an “assault”. GMAFB.

A first year law student could have gotten an assault verdict on these facts before an impartial jury. Like after only a few weeks of taking crim law.

Nope. No reasonable person thinks this was an “assault”.

It’s not what you think. It’s what the statute says.

It’s what the jury thinks.

“The legal standard is what an ordinary reasonable person under the same circumstances as the victim would have believed.”

Correct. Any reasonable person on a jury would find that an offensive touching occurred that satisfied a finding of assault. DC juries are not reasonable. They are made up of political activists and aspiring criminals.

As opposed to the administration and this DOJ, both made up of actual criminals and liars.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

It very clearly was.

Not according to the jury.

Jury nullification in DC does not change facts and is part the reason the criminal justice system in DC is so hopelessly broken.

No reasonable person thinks this was an “assault”. GMAFB.

A first year law student could have gotten an assault verdict on these facts before an impartial jury. Like after only a few weeks of taking crim law.

Nope. No reasonable person thinks this was an “assault”.

It’s not what you think. It’s what the statute says.

It’s what the jury thinks.

“The legal standard is what an ordinary reasonable person under the same circumstances as the victim would have believed.”

Correct. Any reasonable person on a jury would find that an offensive touching occurred that satisfied a finding of assault. DC juries are not reasonable. They are made up of political activists and aspiring criminals.

As opposed to the administration and this DOJ, both made up of actual criminals and liars.

+1

We don’t win this by looking the other way when cops get assaulted. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

It very clearly was.

Not according to the jury.

Jury nullification in DC does not change facts and is part the reason the criminal justice system in DC is so hopelessly broken.

No reasonable person thinks this was an “assault”. GMAFB.

A first year law student could have gotten an assault verdict on these facts before an impartial jury. Like after only a few weeks of taking crim law.

Nope. No reasonable person thinks this was an “assault”.

It’s not what you think. It’s what the statute says.

It’s what the jury thinks.

“The legal standard is what an ordinary reasonable person under the same circumstances as the victim would have believed.”

Correct. Any reasonable person on a jury would find that an offensive touching occurred that satisfied a finding of assault. DC juries are not reasonable. They are made up of political activists and aspiring criminals.

As opposed to the administration and this DOJ, both made up of actual criminals and liars.

+1

We don’t win this by looking the other way when cops get assaulted. Sorry.

We saw cops actually get assaulted at J6.

This wasn’t assault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

It very clearly was.

Not according to the jury.

Jury nullification in DC does not change facts and is part the reason the criminal justice system in DC is so hopelessly broken.

No reasonable person thinks this was an “assault”. GMAFB.

A first year law student could have gotten an assault verdict on these facts before an impartial jury. Like after only a few weeks of taking crim law.

Nope. No reasonable person thinks this was an “assault”.

It’s not what you think. It’s what the statute says.

It’s what the jury thinks.

“The legal standard is what an ordinary reasonable person under the same circumstances as the victim would have believed.”

Correct. Any reasonable person on a jury would find that an offensive touching occurred that satisfied a finding of assault. DC juries are not reasonable. They are made up of political activists and aspiring criminals.

As opposed to the administration and this DOJ, both made up of actual criminals and liars.

+1

We don’t win this by looking the other way when cops get assaulted. Sorry.

We saw cops actually get assaulted at J6.

This wasn’t assault.

That was battery, aggravated battery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

[Anonymous]

Is Subway Sandwich still unemployed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

What does that have to do with the sandwich guy assaulting a federal officer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

What does that have to do with the sandwich guy assaulting a federal officer?

Sandwich guy didn’t “assault” a federal officer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

What does that have to do with the sandwich guy assaulting a federal officer?

Sandwich guy didn’t “assault” a federal officer.

And the PP is pointing out the hypocrisy of Trump pardon thousands of people, many of whom DID assault federal officers and caused death and severe disability. That's well beyond a drunk guy tossing a sandwich at an office and making him "smell the onions and mustard."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

What does that have to do with the sandwich guy assaulting a federal officer?

Sandwich guy didn’t “assault” a federal officer.

Battery? Unlikely. Assault? 100% text book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

What does that have to do with the sandwich guy assaulting a federal officer?

Sandwich guy didn’t “assault” a federal officer.

Battery? Unlikely. Assault? 100% text book.

Most people don’t know the difference sadly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

What does that have to do with the sandwich guy assaulting a federal officer?

Sandwich guy didn’t “assault” a federal officer.

Battery? Unlikely. Assault? 100% text book.

Most people don’t know the difference sadly.

There is no difference as a matter of federal law. The USC collapses the common law offenses of assault and battery into the term assault.

https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/458

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

What does that have to do with the sandwich guy assaulting a federal officer?

Sandwich guy didn’t “assault” a federal officer.

Battery? Unlikely. Assault? 100% text book.

No. No one believes that sandwiches cause harm.

[Anonymous]

The only DC job easier than being a Democrat press secretary is being a DC criminal defense lawyer. It’s basically a no show job. Prosecutors have an impossible job between DC judges and juries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, if a stranger aggressively threw something at me I would want them prosecuted. If we’re being honest, I think most people would agree. Is that an unreasonable expectation?

Cool now do J6

+1

+2

I'd love to hear that.

Well we have great news! Over 1,600 people who were federally charged for J6 and over 1,000 plead guilty. Wish, granted!

I think you missed something …

+1. Maybe you failed to read that Trump pardoned all the January 6 domestic terrorists on the first day of his term. Some like Jared Wise were even hired at DOJ despite being on video encouraging rioters to kill the Capitol Police.

+2

PP?

So because Trump pardoned the J6 crowd, many who spent years in jail and were financially ruined, it’s now ok to assault federal police in a completely unrelated case? Not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. Both seem wrong to me.

It wasn't assault.

+1 However, I would like to hear an explanation of how Trump pardoned 1000+ people, many of whom carried deadly weapons and bludgeoned police officers and caused millions of dollars of destruction to the US Capitol. And Trump even hired some of the January 6 domestic terrorists like Jared Wise who is on video encouraging rioters to kill police officers---he's now paid by our tax dollars as Senior Adviser at the DOJ.

+1 million

What does that have to do with the sandwich guy assaulting a federal officer?

Sandwich guy didn’t “assault” a federal officer.

Battery? Unlikely. Assault? 100% text book.

No. No one believes that sandwiches cause harm.

Then why did he attempt to flee if he didn’t believe a crime was committed?