I agree with pp. I listened to both arguments. The justices were very skeptical of CO's claim and reasoning and actions to this point. I predict 9-0. In favor of Trump. It is the only appropriate ruling. |
I agree. They need to actually work, for once, and produce a reasoned set of applications. Otherwise it's not fair to anyone. |
Love how Roberts said “insurrection is in the eye of the beholder”
Deranged Jack Smith just crapped his pants |
Yes that was a shot across Deranged bow. All his deranged effort going forward is a waste of time. |
No. They will make sure the language is such that it only applies to trump. |
I also predict 9-0 decision rather quickly. |
If a state Supreme Court can’t interpret the 14th amendment then who can? The ballots are certified by each state. The elections are certified by each state. There isn’t a federal government action until Jan. 6 after the election when the state certifications are presented to Congress. If SCOTUS refuses to interpret the 14th Amendment before the election, we could see Members of Congress object to counting any electoral votes for Trump on the grounds that he is not eligible for office. This time it would be a legitimate question. Majorities of the House and Senate already voted that way. |
Possibly. Possibly not. I don't think the primary election calendar is driving their calendar. And, CO has Trump on the primary ballot at this time. Good thing, because based on oral arguments, it appears SCOTUS will rule in Trump's favor.
https://www.9news.com/article/news/politics/e...37-a35b-fb45f64fc4a2 |