Wealthy donors pull funding from from Harvard and U Penn for failure to denounce “antisemitism”

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These students are not being cancelled for being against war or having a different political opinion. They are being cancelled for celebrating or justifying the deaths, rapes and kidnaps of women and children.

Firms who disagree with their viewpoint have the right not to hire them. These students are also hypocritical and should go work for firms that align with their views. It’s a win win.


I don't think that's the issue. You can choose not to hire a student without issuing press statements, doxxing them, spending millions on smear campaigns. The firms don't go through these steps when they decide not to hire other applicants, what they are doing is discriminatory and illegal in many states.

These firms are using their money and platform to suffocate those they disagree with them. They can do that in their companies, not at US colleges.


This. It's the PR mechanism that is illegal and discriminatory. Plus, the framing of it is complete slander as the statements have been misconstrued and falsified in many ways.

It is part of the greater fascism at play. Support Israel or else.....

We see you. And we will not support apartheid. Good thing I'm self employed because failure to support apartheid is now a fireable offense.


It's neither illegal nor discriminatory.

It's not slander.

It's also not the law firms (as was pointed out earlier).

It's DEFINITELY not fascism.

And it's not the "failure to support 'apartheid'" that's the issue.


It's totally discriminatory if the employer does not extend a similar level of scrutiny to ALL applicants.

Also illegal in many states. NY Labor Law Section 201-d of the New York Labor Law (NYLL) - "protects conduct that occurs when an employee is "off of the employer's premises and without use of the employer's equipment or other property" and where the employee is not "suffered, permitted or expected to be engaged in work" or "actually engaged in work."


Have you read the definitions and the exceptions?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These students are not being cancelled for being against war or having a different political opinion. They are being cancelled for celebrating or justifying the deaths, rapes and kidnaps of women and children.

Firms who disagree with their viewpoint have the right not to hire them. These students are also hypocritical and should go work for firms that align with their views. It’s a win win.


I don't think that's the issue. You can choose not to hire a student without issuing press statements, doxxing them, spending millions on smear campaigns. The firms don't go through these steps when they decide not to hire other applicants, what they are doing is discriminatory and illegal in many states.

These firms are using their money and platform to suffocate those they disagree with them. They can do that in their companies, not at US colleges.


This. It's the PR mechanism that is illegal and discriminatory. Plus, the framing of it is complete slander as the statements have been misconstrued and falsified in many ways.

It is part of the greater fascism at play. Support Israel or else.....

We see you. And we will not support apartheid. Good thing I'm self employed because failure to support apartheid is now a fireable offense.


It's neither illegal nor discriminatory.

It's not slander.

It's also not the law firms (as was pointed out earlier).

It's DEFINITELY not fascism.

And it's not the "failure to support 'apartheid'" that's the issue.


It's totally discriminatory if the employer does not extend a similar level of scrutiny to ALL applicants.

Also illegal in many states. NY Labor Law Section 201-d of the New York Labor Law (NYLL) - "protects conduct that occurs when an employee is "off of the employer's premises and without use of the employer's equipment or other property" and where the employee is not "suffered, permitted or expected to be engaged in work" or "actually engaged in work."


It appears that statute would not apply in these cases:

This statute prohibits discrimination on the basis of an employee’s “political activities outside of working hours, off of the employer’s premises and without the use of the employer’s equipment or other property.”[1] N.Y. Lab. Law § 201-d(1)(a). Importantly, New York’s Labor Law defines “political activities” as running for public office, campaigning for a candidate for public office, or participating in political fundraising activities.
Anonymous
People like this are teaching our youth. I hope donors to the School of the Art Institute of Chicago take action.....



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Citibank employee said "No wonder Hitler wanted to get rid of all of them" on social media.

Citibank really had no choice. You can't have an employee fostering that level of hatred in the workplace.


Why are so many women saying such antisemitic things?


You mean like the women of Hamas?

Like…what are you talking about? It’s men and women and, nowadays, the non-binary! ….welcome to antisemitism. It’s everyone!
Anonymous
Harvard finds itself in an ideological bind. Following Hamas’s horrific terror attack against Israel, the Harvard College Palestine Solidarity Committee issued a statement, co-signed by 33 other student groups, blaming the Jewish state for the murder, rape, and mutilation of its own citizens by Hamas. "Today’s events did not occur in a vacuum," the statement read. "The apartheid regime is the only one to blame."

The reaction was swift. The media, the public, and prominent political figures condemned the students for rationalizing atrocities against innocent people, including women, children, and the elderly. Harvard’s administration, long accustomed to toeing the radical line, hesitated for days before releasing a generic statement of condemnation and writing that "no student group—not even 30 student groups—speaks for Harvard University or its leadership."

Meantime, former Harvard president Lawrence Summers expressed surprise, wondering on social media why the university could not "find anything approaching the moral clarity of Harvard statements after George Floyd’s death or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine."

It is hard to believe that Summers is being sincere. As anyone in Harvard’s orbit would know—especially a long-time professor and former university president—the politics of decolonization, critical race theory, and anti-Israel agitation has been a staple of public life on that campus for decades. And it is not a cause driven solely by misguided students: administrators, department leaders, and prominent faculty have all developed it, institutionalized it, or at least publicly deferred to the radicals who did.

One needs only to browse the current Harvard course catalog to see how deeply the rhetoric of "decolonization" has been embedded. One course, "Global Rebellion: Race, Solidarity, and Decolonization," draws on critical ethnic studies, a subfield of critical race theory, and promises to promote "Black, Asian, Latinx, and Indigenous radicalism"—that is, left-wing ethnopolitics for everyone except whites and Jews. The goal, according to the course description, is to "discuss how BIPOC communities forged cross-racial, internationalist solidarities to rebel against global white supremacy."

Another course, "Colonialism and its Postcolonial/Decolonial Afterlives," features readings of Lenin and Frantz Fanon, the latter of whom argued that "violence is a cleansing force" that "frees the native from his inferiority complex" and "restores his self-respect."

Five Harvard faculty also issued a statement linking the work of "Palestinian liberation" to the work of decolonizing Harvard, arguing for "a more robust commitment to teaching about Palestine, to incorporating work by Palestinians into our syllabi, to inviting Palestinian scholars and community members to speak at university events, and to supporting campus activism for Palestinian liberation."

Montalvo and his fellow travelers make clear that "Decolonization is Not a Metaphor," as the title of a scholarly paper asserts. As Palestinian militants decolonize Israel, the logic goes, domestic academics should decolonize institutions such as Harvard.

As we have seen since October 7, the outcome of "decolonization" is barbarism. For Hamas, it means murdering women, children, and the elderly, executing innocent people on the street, and mutilating infants in their homes.

For the radical academics, the process is less brutal but barbaric all the same: it means destroying our best institutions, obliterating academic standards, and elevating witchcraft, voodoo, and pseudo-science into positions of prestige. The philosopher Leo Strauss once defined nihilism as opposition to civilization as such—and this is precisely what the decolonizing academics have done, acting out their vengeful fantasies to "abolish" Harvard, once a crowning symbol of Western civilization.

Americans need to understand that the massacre in Gaza is not only a foreign outrage. The same ethno-radicals who cheer Hamas’s destruction of civilization abroad also want to commit civilizational suicide here at home.






Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:if universities had stayed politically neutral then you’d be right. but they dug themselves this hole by deciding that the university shoild take sides instead of being an institution that creates a space for all sides.


I agree. I’m so disappointed that an institution like Harvard who knows the true history of they bother to understand it can't see past dollar signs. Instead they are gaslighting and trying to blacklist the truth. Every American has the right to free speech whether you agree or disagree.


This is not a free speech issue. If a donor doesn't like the content of speech affiliated with a university, they are free to place their funds elsewhere.


No that is not what they are doing. They are using the conservative play book of attacking individuals to silence them. This is exactly what Trump and the conservative do every day.


LOL. It wasn't conservatives that came up with TERF or Karen to silence women.
It wasn't conservatives that call everyone a MAGA, Nazi, Bot, troll for everyone opinion they disagree with.
Progressives cannot stand the idea that their monster has turned on them.


Independent voter, and I agree with pretty much all of this.


Progressives maybe, but not Dems. The real dems - like Joe Biden (and me) - are sane.

Unfortunately, the real republicans are just MAGA and insane. That’s why normal republicans are now dems.

Antisemitism is part MAGA, no doubt. It’s not part of main stream dems though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:if universities had stayed politically neutral then you’d be right. but they dug themselves this hole by deciding that the university shoild take sides instead of being an institution that creates a space for all sides.


I agree. I’m so disappointed that an institution like Harvard who knows the true history of they bother to understand it can't see past dollar signs. Instead they are gaslighting and trying to blacklist the truth. Every American has the right to free speech whether you agree or disagree.


This is not a free speech issue. If a donor doesn't like the content of speech affiliated with a university, they are free to place their funds elsewhere.


No that is not what they are doing. They are using the conservative play book of attacking individuals to silence them. This is exactly what Trump and the conservative do every day.


LOL. It wasn't conservatives that came up with TERF or Karen to silence women.
It wasn't conservatives that call everyone a MAGA, Nazi, Bot, troll for everyone opinion they disagree with.
Progressives cannot stand the idea that their monster has turned on them.


Independent voter, and I agree with pretty much all of this.


Progressives maybe, but not Dems. The real dems - like Joe Biden (and me) - are sane.

Unfortunately, the real republicans are just MAGA and insane. That’s why normal republicans are now dems.

Antisemitism is part MAGA, no doubt. It’s not part of main stream dems though.


I think the guy wearing the camp auschwitz shirt on Jan 6 was clearly being ironic. That's why none of his very much not antisemitic fellow protestors didn't seem to mind
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harvard finds itself in an ideological bind. Following Hamas’s horrific terror attack against Israel, the Harvard College Palestine Solidarity Committee issued a statement, co-signed by 33 other student groups, blaming the Jewish state for the murder, rape, and mutilation of its own citizens by Hamas. "Today’s events did not occur in a vacuum," the statement read. "The apartheid regime is the only one to blame."

The reaction was swift. The media, the public, and prominent political figures condemned the students for rationalizing atrocities against innocent people, including women, children, and the elderly. Harvard’s administration, long accustomed to toeing the radical line, hesitated for days before releasing a generic statement of condemnation and writing that "no student group—not even 30 student groups—speaks for Harvard University or its leadership."

Meantime, former Harvard president Lawrence Summers expressed surprise, wondering on social media why the university could not "find anything approaching the moral clarity of Harvard statements after George Floyd’s death or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine."

It is hard to believe that Summers is being sincere. As anyone in Harvard’s orbit would know—especially a long-time professor and former university president—the politics of decolonization, critical race theory, and anti-Israel agitation has been a staple of public life on that campus for decades. And it is not a cause driven solely by misguided students: administrators, department leaders, and prominent faculty have all developed it, institutionalized it, or at least publicly deferred to the radicals who did.

One needs only to browse the current Harvard course catalog to see how deeply the rhetoric of "decolonization" has been embedded. One course, "Global Rebellion: Race, Solidarity, and Decolonization," draws on critical ethnic studies, a subfield of critical race theory, and promises to promote "Black, Asian, Latinx, and Indigenous radicalism"—that is, left-wing ethnopolitics for everyone except whites and Jews. The goal, according to the course description, is to "discuss how BIPOC communities forged cross-racial, internationalist solidarities to rebel against global white supremacy."

Another course, "Colonialism and its Postcolonial/Decolonial Afterlives," features readings of Lenin and Frantz Fanon, the latter of whom argued that "violence is a cleansing force" that "frees the native from his inferiority complex" and "restores his self-respect."

Five Harvard faculty also issued a statement linking the work of "Palestinian liberation" to the work of decolonizing Harvard, arguing for "a more robust commitment to teaching about Palestine, to incorporating work by Palestinians into our syllabi, to inviting Palestinian scholars and community members to speak at university events, and to supporting campus activism for Palestinian liberation."

Montalvo and his fellow travelers make clear that "Decolonization is Not a Metaphor," as the title of a scholarly paper asserts. As Palestinian militants decolonize Israel, the logic goes, domestic academics should decolonize institutions such as Harvard.

As we have seen since October 7, the outcome of "decolonization" is barbarism. For Hamas, it means murdering women, children, and the elderly, executing innocent people on the street, and mutilating infants in their homes.

For the radical academics, the process is less brutal but barbaric all the same: it means destroying our best institutions, obliterating academic standards, and elevating witchcraft, voodoo, and pseudo-science into positions of prestige. The philosopher Leo Strauss once defined nihilism as opposition to civilization as such—and this is precisely what the decolonizing academics have done, acting out their vengeful fantasies to "abolish" Harvard, once a crowning symbol of Western civilization.

Americans need to understand that the massacre in Gaza is not only a foreign outrage. The same ethno-radicals who cheer Hamas’s destruction of civilization abroad also want to commit civilizational suicide here at home.








Thank you for this post. Hopefully Harvard gets Bud lighted. The takeover of our colleges by Hamas is sick. There were Hamas speakers at the Penn writers symposium.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:People like this are teaching our youth. I hope donors to the School of the Art Institute of Chicago take action.....





The Art Institute of Chicago is the same organization that fired all of the white volunteer docents. If you were white you could no longer volunteer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:if universities had stayed politically neutral then you’d be right. but they dug themselves this hole by deciding that the university shoild take sides instead of being an institution that creates a space for all sides.


I agree. I’m so disappointed that an institution like Harvard who knows the true history of they bother to understand it can't see past dollar signs. Instead they are gaslighting and trying to blacklist the truth. Every American has the right to free speech whether you agree or disagree.


This is not a free speech issue. If a donor doesn't like the content of speech affiliated with a university, they are free to place their funds elsewhere.


No that is not what they are doing. They are using the conservative play book of attacking individuals to silence them. This is exactly what Trump and the conservative do every day.


LOL. It wasn't conservatives that came up with TERF or Karen to silence women.
It wasn't conservatives that call everyone a MAGA, Nazi, Bot, troll for everyone opinion they disagree with.
Progressives cannot stand the idea that their monster has turned on them.


Independent voter, and I agree with pretty much all of this.


Then you're a moron. It was Conservatives who started all this BS of attacking something they disagree with. Freedom Fries? Colin Kaepernick? Just to name a few. Those are just the "kind" examples.


That's all you got? Freedom fries and lousy QB? Women have had to go into hiding for daring to say men can't be women. Have had rape and death threats.
I'll own freedom fries all day compared to rape threats from your side when women have the audacity to state human sex is binary.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These students are not being cancelled for being against war or having a different political opinion. They are being cancelled for celebrating or justifying the deaths, rapes and kidnaps of women and children.

Firms who disagree with their viewpoint have the right not to hire them. These students are also hypocritical and should go work for firms that align with their views. It’s a win win.


I don't think that's the issue. You can choose not to hire a student without issuing press statements, doxxing them, spending millions on smear campaigns. The firms don't go through these steps when they decide not to hire other applicants, what they are doing is discriminatory and illegal in many states.

These firms are using their money and platform to suffocate those they disagree with them. They can do that in their companies, not at US colleges.


This. It's the PR mechanism that is illegal and discriminatory. Plus, the framing of it is complete slander as the statements have been misconstrued and falsified in many ways.

It is part of the greater fascism at play. Support Israel or else.....

We see you. And we will not support apartheid. Good thing I'm self employed because failure to support apartheid is now a fireable offense.


It's neither illegal nor discriminatory.

It's not slander.

It's also not the law firms (as was pointed out earlier).

It's DEFINITELY not fascism.

And it's not the "failure to support 'apartheid'" that's the issue.


It's totally discriminatory if the employer does not extend a similar level of scrutiny to ALL applicants.

Also illegal in many states. NY Labor Law Section 201-d of the New York Labor Law (NYLL) - "protects conduct that occurs when an employee is "off of the employer's premises and without use of the employer's equipment or other property" and where the employee is not "suffered, permitted or expected to be engaged in work" or "actually engaged in work."


I never remember you posting these laws when democrats where gleefully stating they would never hire anyone the believed to be republican. Did you suddenly find this law out? Have you seen the error of your ways?
Or maybe you are realizing that people have long memories of abuse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Citibank employee said "No wonder Hitler wanted to get rid of all of them" on social media.

Citibank really had no choice. You can't have an employee fostering that level of hatred in the workplace.


Why are so many women saying such antisemitic things?


You mean like the women of Hamas?

Like…what are you talking about? It’s men and women and, nowadays, the non-binary! ….welcome to antisemitism. It’s everyone!


I suppose.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Citibank employee said "No wonder Hitler wanted to get rid of all of them" on social media.

Citibank really had no choice. You can't have an employee fostering that level of hatred in the workplace.


Why are so many women saying such antisemitic things?


You are finally seeing who the real Nazis are....................And it isn't conservative women.

Own this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harvard finds itself in an ideological bind. Following Hamas’s horrific terror attack against Israel, the Harvard College Palestine Solidarity Committee issued a statement, co-signed by 33 other student groups, blaming the Jewish state for the murder, rape, and mutilation of its own citizens by Hamas. "Today’s events did not occur in a vacuum," the statement read. "The apartheid regime is the only one to blame."

The reaction was swift. The media, the public, and prominent political figures condemned the students for rationalizing atrocities against innocent people, including women, children, and the elderly. Harvard’s administration, long accustomed to toeing the radical line, hesitated for days before releasing a generic statement of condemnation and writing that "no student group—not even 30 student groups—speaks for Harvard University or its leadership."

Meantime, former Harvard president Lawrence Summers expressed surprise, wondering on social media why the university could not "find anything approaching the moral clarity of Harvard statements after George Floyd’s death or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine."

It is hard to believe that Summers is being sincere. As anyone in Harvard’s orbit would know—especially a long-time professor and former university president—the politics of decolonization, critical race theory, and anti-Israel agitation has been a staple of public life on that campus for decades. And it is not a cause driven solely by misguided students: administrators, department leaders, and prominent faculty have all developed it, institutionalized it, or at least publicly deferred to the radicals who did.

One needs only to browse the current Harvard course catalog to see how deeply the rhetoric of "decolonization" has been embedded. One course, "Global Rebellion: Race, Solidarity, and Decolonization," draws on critical ethnic studies, a subfield of critical race theory, and promises to promote "Black, Asian, Latinx, and Indigenous radicalism"—that is, left-wing ethnopolitics for everyone except whites and Jews. The goal, according to the course description, is to "discuss how BIPOC communities forged cross-racial, internationalist solidarities to rebel against global white supremacy."

Another course, "Colonialism and its Postcolonial/Decolonial Afterlives," features readings of Lenin and Frantz Fanon, the latter of whom argued that "violence is a cleansing force" that "frees the native from his inferiority complex" and "restores his self-respect."

Five Harvard faculty also issued a statement linking the work of "Palestinian liberation" to the work of decolonizing Harvard, arguing for "a more robust commitment to teaching about Palestine, to incorporating work by Palestinians into our syllabi, to inviting Palestinian scholars and community members to speak at university events, and to supporting campus activism for Palestinian liberation."

Montalvo and his fellow travelers make clear that "Decolonization is Not a Metaphor," as the title of a scholarly paper asserts. As Palestinian militants decolonize Israel, the logic goes, domestic academics should decolonize institutions such as Harvard.

As we have seen since October 7, the outcome of "decolonization" is barbarism. For Hamas, it means murdering women, children, and the elderly, executing innocent people on the street, and mutilating infants in their homes.

For the radical academics, the process is less brutal but barbaric all the same: it means destroying our best institutions, obliterating academic standards, and elevating witchcraft, voodoo, and pseudo-science into positions of prestige. The philosopher Leo Strauss once defined nihilism as opposition to civilization as such—and this is precisely what the decolonizing academics have done, acting out their vengeful fantasies to "abolish" Harvard, once a crowning symbol of Western civilization.

Americans need to understand that the massacre in Gaza is not only a foreign outrage. The same ethno-radicals who cheer Hamas’s destruction of civilization abroad also want to commit civilizational suicide here at home.








Harvard undergrad has perhaps two or three remaining moderate Republican professors. The Palestine-Israel dynamic gives the suburban freedom fighter students who are steeped in decolonization courses a real life chance, right now, to see how theory becomes action. So thr students becomw very excited. Why this leads to cheering on Hamas, a right wing fundamentalist group, is beyond me. Unless the students are just phonies.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Citibank employee said "No wonder Hitler wanted to get rid of all of them" on social media.

Citibank really had no choice. You can't have an employee fostering that level of hatred in the workplace.


Why are so many women saying such antisemitic things?


You are finally seeing who the real Nazis are....................And it isn't conservative women.

Own this.


I’ve known it for 40 years.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: