JK Rowling's gender policing finally caught up to her

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So many ppl threatened by those different than themselves. It’s sad. Maybe they need therapy.

It’s sad that people cannot simply acknowledge and accept that there is occasionally scientific reality and fact that goes against their personal feelings and beliefs.

There are two sexes among Homo sapiens: male and female. Sex in humans is determined by the presence of XX or XY chromosomes. That’s it. That’s all that matters. Not anatomy, not opinion, not hairstyle, not feelings, not clothing, not surgery, not hormone therapy, not gender reassignment, nothing EXCEPT chromosomes dictate sex.


It’s really frustrating and frankly - weird - like Trumpian weird - that so many people who profess to trust the science in other areas (climate, pandemic safety, vaccines, etc) so stubbornly deny the science when it comes to this subject. Then it all goes back to personal feelings.

It’s disappointing. Many of you are so much less intelligent than you think you are. It’s sad.

Takes one to know one!

You’re certain there’s just “XX” and “XY.” That would be news to those with XXY and XYY conditions and others like it. But you’re so intelligent.

How many times does it need to be explained that XXY and XYY occur when something goes wrong with the process?
It is not one of the two expected outcomes for an offspring.

It’s pretty rich that you accuse others of lack of intelligence when you can’t grasp this simple concept.

Do you think "Science" is some god sitting around on a golden throne with expectations and plans? That's interpretation, and it is done by humans. Science talks about what IS. What "SHOULD BE" is a matter of interpretation, and it would be pretty squishy for a scientist to suggest otherwise.

Incorrect. The current accepted science is that a male and a female mate to produce either male or female offspring. Anything other than that is an unexpected error. A deviation from the ideal.

That is what science is. This is our current belief. This has been our belief for literally centuries. There is no body of evidence that proves otherwise. If there someday is, the scientific consensus will change.

Darwin’s theory of evolution is the current accepted explanation for evolution. Until someone comes along and shows otherwise, his theory is what scientists believe to be true.

Scientists estimate The concept of distinct male and female started 120,000 to 200,000 years ago.

[Anonymous]

I was my understanding that the boxer person has xy chromosomes and suffers from a genetic disorder or syndrome. They were raised as female due to genital presentation at birth. They do have high testosterone levels. There is a difference between hate speech and facts. Not sure what jk rowling or musk tweeted, but stating facts, however "offensive" is not hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was my understanding that the boxer person has xy chromosomes and suffers from a genetic disorder or syndrome. They were raised as female due to genital presentation at birth. They do have high testosterone levels. There is a difference between hate speech and facts. Not sure what jk rowling or musk tweeted, but stating facts, however "offensive" is not hate.

They assumed she's trans. She's not. Also we don't know her chromosomes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was my understanding that the boxer person has xy chromosomes and suffers from a genetic disorder or syndrome. They were raised as female due to genital presentation at birth. They do have high testosterone levels. There is a difference between hate speech and facts. Not sure what jk rowling or musk tweeted, but stating facts, however "offensive" is not hate.

They assumed she's trans. She's not. Also we don't know her chromosomes.

So why is she allowed to compete with women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was my understanding that the boxer person has xy chromosomes and suffers from a genetic disorder or syndrome. They were raised as female due to genital presentation at birth. They do have high testosterone levels. There is a difference between hate speech and facts. Not sure what jk rowling or musk tweeted, but stating facts, however "offensive" is not hate.

None of these things you “understand “ are actually facts. Hence your confusion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was my understanding that the boxer person has xy chromosomes and suffers from a genetic disorder or syndrome. They were raised as female due to genital presentation at birth. They do have high testosterone levels. There is a difference between hate speech and facts. Not sure what jk rowling or musk tweeted, but stating facts, however "offensive" is not hate.

They assumed she's trans. She's not. Also we don't know her chromosomes.

So why is she allowed to compete with women?

Because her birth certificate says female. And her passport. And her government. And her family. And Imane’s own words.

Am I supposed to believe an Islamic government that bans homosexuality and transgenders is sending a man as woman to the Olympics? That really defies all logic.

Occam’s razor folks. She’s a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was my understanding that the boxer person has xy chromosomes and suffers from a genetic disorder or syndrome. They were raised as female due to genital presentation at birth. They do have high testosterone levels. There is a difference between hate speech and facts. Not sure what jk rowling or musk tweeted, but stating facts, however "offensive" is not hate.

They assumed she's trans. She's not. Also we don't know her chromosomes.

So why is she allowed to compete with women?

Because her birth certificate says female. And her passport. And her government. And her family. And Imane’s own words.

Am I supposed to believe an Islamic government that bans homosexuality and transgenders is sending a man as woman to the Olympics? That really defies all logic.

Occam’s razor folks. She’s a woman.

Do you think an Islamic society that bans homosexuality and transgenders would allow a baby without a male appendage to be called a boy? It really defies all logic.

[Anonymous]

Why isn't katie ledecky attacked in the same manner?