It sounds like being a manger in a government agency. Which I'm pretty sure a number of people on this board can relate to. That's not a dig, just a comment that this is relatable. Hey, at least you get new workers every year, and don't have to endure the bad ones endlessly. |
Teaching is difficult because there is little flexibility when school is in session. That's absolutely true. The lack of flexibility requires teachers to have to miss their own kids' school events, which many of us can attend. I keep asking if there isn't some way to improve on that, whether through teaching as teams or having a floating backup at school, or some other way to give teachers a chance to take an occasional day off without too much stress. On the other hand, you don't know what other people have done to earn or keep flexible work arrangements. When my kids were in early elementary school, many of the moms who had been SAHMs were looking for jobs and were dissatisfied with what they could find. They would tell me how "lucky" I was to have a part-time job. I did consider myself to be fortunate to have that part-time position, but before getting that, I worked countless hours as a litigator, almost around the clock, in order to have time with my kids. Even that "part-time" job required more hours than I was paid for and often saw me up at 4:00 a.m. working to make up for the "flexibility" to be there for my kids during the day. You never know. But I agree that teachers have to work harder than they should and will tell anyone willing to listen that the busy administrative work that takes time away from actual teaching needs to go ASAP. |
Understood. It is unfortunate with teaching though that even if you have seniority, have been a high achiever, etc, you will never get to a place where you have "earned" this high amount of flexibility and reduced hours that many other working moms on DCUM speak of as if it's expected. And pretty much all of these other jobs pay (way) more than teaching. Now, I get that some of this should be known before becoming a teacher, which is why I always wanted to be a SAHM once I had kids. Some of it, however, was difficult to understand until I started working in the school system. |
| Because teachers are the least overworked employees out there. |
NP and I don’t feel overworked but what has started to bother me about the job is that seniority, experience, strong performance gets me nothing. That part of the job gets tiring especially when co workers who don’t have those qualities get the same schedule, courses, etc as me. |
+1,000 I mean the ESL teachers pull Small groups of 4 or less kids and get paid the same. Why am I putting up with parents and 23 kids + sped inclusion. Also why is that equitable for anyone- children or teachers |
Exactly. Paying good teachers well, firing bad fits, and acknowledging differences in performance helps everybody, and not having this hurts the best teachers while creating job security for the worst |
This comment has no credibility whatsoever unless you are a teacher or have been one. |
I teach ESL and I have 67 students. Yes I pull them in small groups, but that doesn't mean it is any easier than teaching 23. Your students are all one grade level. Mine are grade K-5 and they are all levels, and also many have IEPs. |
Theoretically I agree but in practice I have never seen any ideas for rating performance that I would consider fair. I was a special ed teacher. Test scores are meaningless for kids who are performing 4+ grade levels behind. 95% of the admin that did my performance evaluations had virtually zero sped experience (my evals were always fine but do I think that 15 min observation should determine pay/other perks?). |
| If test scores mattered teachers would avoid working at low SES schools. |
Special Ed teachers should be paid MORE. There is so much paperwork. And meetings. And paperwork. Did I mention the paperwork? |
+1 I'm gen ed ES, but the last I knew our ESL teacher had 90+ students. |
Certainly. I have just never seen any performance pay models that acknowledge any special ed situations, our students just seem to be included in these testing models. The paperwork was also frustrating because I was known for being on top of it, having well-written IEPs, etc, but I do not recall any admin including that in an evaluation (and really there were no specific sections that addressed it) but obviously it's a huge part of the job and if you make an error and someone notices, central office will be all over you. So there is zero upside to being a high performer on a huge, very stressful aspect of the job, in fact I usually had more responsibilities piled on me. This is in addition to the teaching that you are actually evaluated on. |
I don’t think there’s ever an entirely fair review process, but corporate America manages without testing through the use of reviews. 360 reviews in my experience was too much paperwork. I’d avocate looking into HR best practices for industries where results cannot be easily or quickly measured such as in environment, parts of engineering, innovation and going from there |