FCPS comprehensive boundary review

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow, Dunne puts out a lot of information and seems to be engaging with his district a lot. Have barely heard from Lady. Her newsletters seem very infrequent.


Frequent and wordy newsletters aren't necessarily a great thing. Sizemore-Heizer puts out ones where she pats herself on the back for paragraphs on end or rambles on. Not very useful. McLaughlin used to have frequent and more pithy emails with things constituents might need to know (mostly, at least).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


“White Saviors”? Very telling. You do realize there are high SES minority families who will also be impacted right?



They are “white-adjacent” and therefore “white” for the purposes of demographic redistribution.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


That only works with extensive bussing which will never happen
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


That’s kind of tired trolling. No one expects that to happen and it would entail a patchwork quilt of boundaries full of attendance islands and requiring long commutes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


That’s kind of tired trolling. No one expects that to happen and it would entail a patchwork quilt of boundaries full of attendance islands and requiring long commutes.


It's how equity troll typically writes, so it's probably equity troll. Not sure why they feel the need to interject these comments on most threads.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


That only works with extensive bussing which will never happen


Children already ride buses 🚌 to school.

If you are saying that transit times would drastically increase trying to distribute family incomes EQUALLY, you are correct.
That would result in ridiculously gerrymandered boundaries.

We can make things less drastically imbalanced with boundaries that decrease transit times substantially for some children, increase it insignificantly for some, and keep it the same for many others.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


That only works with extensive bussing which will never happen


Children already ride buses 🚌 to school.

If you are saying that transit times would drastically increase trying to distribute family incomes EQUALLY, you are correct.
That would result in ridiculously gerrymandered boundaries.

We can make things less drastically imbalanced with boundaries that decrease transit times substantially for some children, increase it insignificantly for some, and keep it the same for many others.


That’s the one dimensional thinking that the school board is using.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


You’re living in a ridiculous fantasy world.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


That only works with extensive bussing which will never happen


Children already ride buses 🚌 to school.

If you are saying that transit times would drastically increase trying to distribute family incomes EQUALLY, you are correct.
That would result in ridiculously gerrymandered boundaries.

We can make things less drastically imbalanced with boundaries that decrease transit times substantially for some children, increase it insignificantly for some, and keep it the same for many others.



That's not how things work. West Potomac HS was formed by the merger of Fort Hunt HS and Groveton HS. In today's terms, Fort Hunt was like Langley and Groveton was like Annandale or Falls Church. The schools combined and, over time, West Potomac ended up looking a lot more like Groveton than Fort Hunt.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow, Dunne puts out a lot of information and seems to be engaging with his district a lot. Have barely heard from Lady. Her newsletters seem very infrequent.


In the Q&A with the consultant, Dunne appeared to be the only person on the board, including Reid, thst realizes what a bad idea this is and how terrible the execution is and will be.

I suspect he had intended to use the school board as a jumping off point for local or state office, and just realized in real time how this unwanted rezoning will tank his 5 year plan. He is trying to save his future political aspirations.

The rest of them think blue no matter who Ffx County will continue to blindly vote for them no matter what they do on rezoning.


That’s how blue voters operate.

They will watch their schools and neighborhoods decline and continue to vote blue.

The rich ones (including the politicians) can pay to mitigate the damage, whether it’s moving to a richer neighborhood whose residents take steps to protect it or putting their own children in private schools 🤷‍♀️.

As long as they can pat themselves on the back for making the “morally superior” voting choice, it’s all good.
Anonymous
This seems relevant. Once the school board pushes through these unpopular and unnecessary boundary changes, vouchers are going to become much more likely in our state.

https://abcnews.go.com/538/2024-election-big-impact-education-policy/story?id=114849832

The school board will win the battle and lose the war. I’m done with their nonsense and salivating over the prospect of vouchers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This seems relevant. Once the school board pushes through these unpopular and unnecessary boundary changes, vouchers are going to become much more likely in our state.

https://abcnews.go.com/538/2024-election-big-impact-education-policy/story?id=114849832

The school board will win the battle and lose the war. I’m done with their nonsense and salivating over the prospect of vouchers.


In practice the School Board acts for a relatively small group - mostly White middle and upper middle class parents who bought houses zoned for low-performing schools and want FCPS to give them a windfall to increase their housing equity.

They don’t realize that the short-term rush they’ll get from these changes will be outweighed by the accelerated decline in the county as a whole as a larger number of residents realize their desire for stability when it comes to school boundaries is ignored. This will translate into less support for FCPS, more support for vouchers, and more people with other options avoiding leaving or avoiding the county.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


You first.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I guess we should/could attend the current high school meeting and the high school our kids may attend.

Remember the kids are watching and those minority income kids want to see their ‘white saviors” excited about moving in the middle of high school!

How exactly does the school board believe berating people into feeling bad about wanting high performing schools for their kids will help the kids?


All children deserve high-performance schools.
The board can make that happen by starting from scratch and moving enough high-performing children to schools that need them.
In the end, all the schools and the children in them will be better off.


That only works with extensive bussing which will never happen


Children already ride buses 🚌 to school.

If you are saying that transit times would drastically increase trying to distribute family incomes EQUALLY, you are correct.
That would result in ridiculously gerrymandered boundaries.

We can make things less drastically imbalanced with boundaries that decrease transit times substantially for some children, increase it insignificantly for some, and keep it the same for many others.



That's not how things work. West Potomac HS was formed by the merger of Fort Hunt HS and Groveton HS. In today's terms, Fort Hunt was like Langley and Groveton was like Annandale or Falls Church. The schools combined and, over time, West Potomac ended up looking a lot more like Groveton than Fort Hunt.


We can’t keep the status quo. It’s untenable for the disparities to be so vast in the same system.
Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Go to: