Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
I think they can do it a few more times. I mean if "obstruction of congress" is impeachable, then they can pass an article of impeachment every time the executive doesn't go along with the legislature. Heck, every time he vetos a bill will be an impeachable offense. |
You mean every time he instructs people not to comply with subpoenas. Right. |
Haha. The third president in the history of the country to be impeached -- that's not winning. Nancy is not the loser today. |
|
Interesting articles around the past few days. Lots of people working multiple jobs. About half the jobs in America are low wage jobs.
So yeah, the economy is great if you need a job. Less so if you need a good one. None of this is Trump related. This is about the Republican war on unions and worship of the so called free market. But Trump hasn’t done much about it either....save cutting taxes for corporations. But hey! Dollar stores are in expansion mode! Awesome! |
With the low bar for impeachment established by Nancy, this is going to be like an achievement award for future presidents. Democrats are the destroyer of institutions - they throw hissy fits and abuse the mechanisms of our government for their own political purpose. When something doesn't go their way, it's no longer that their policy is bad, but the mechanism that's bad. Can't get Demoratic agenda through in the Senate? Employ the nuclear option - institution destroyed. Can't pass anything through Congress? Executive overreach - institution destroyed. Don't like the election results? Abolish the electoral college - institution destroyed. |
You sound ridiculous, posting nonsense like that. |
In other words, whether or not Trump is in office the market can do just fine. So why are you sticking with a con man with no moral core who daily embarrasses this nation and degrades the office of the presidency and acts like a petulant bully you'd not want your own child to emulate? |
Word salad. |
This a weird statement. Somehow unemployment at 3.5% with low wages is worse than much higher unemployment with $0 wages. And somehow the reduction in people returning to the workforce is worse than not returning. Millions of people have returned to the workforce who had quit looking and fell off unemployment rolls. |
Low bar? You thought having consensual sex with a woman who wasn't his wife was a good reason to impeach? If yes, how do you feel about having a president who was banging porn stars and violated campaign finance laws trying to cover it up? |
You might want to look up how Soros got so wealthy |
What’s his field? |
The low bar was established by Newt. Impeaching a president for lying about a blowjob that was not material to conduct of the state moved the needle. At least in this case, we are talking about the sanctity of our election and conspiracy against the people of the United States - ie not a low bar. |
From where? LOL. |
Never heard that. I’m a ‘con’ |