BOYS 2027 DMV Commitments BOYS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DC Express 2027:
1 Navy (Bullis) Defense
1 St. Joseph's (Bullis) LSM
1 Holy Cross (GP) Midfield
 
Next Level 2027:
1 Michigan (Deerfield) Defense
1 Cornell (GC) Midfield
1 Dartmouth (Landon) LSM
1 Penn (Bullis) Midfield 
1 Cornell (Landon) Defense 
1 Brown (STA) Defense
1 Delaware (Landon) LSM
1 Brown (GP) Attack
1 Bucknell (STC) Goalie
1 Georgetown (Landon) Attack
1 Johns Hokpkins (GP) Midfield
 
Madlax 2027:
1 AF (SJC) Defense
1 Army (HP-TX) FOGO
1 Penn State (Yorktown) Attack
1 Princeton (GP) Midfield
1 Delaware (GC) Defense 
1 Villanova (SJC) LSM
1 Michigan (Deerfield) Midfield
1 Penn State (SJC) Attack/Midfield
1 Ohio State (Taft) Attack
1 Bucknell (STC) Defense
1 Bucknell (SJC) Defense
1 Providence (GZ) SSDM
1 Colgate (GZ) Midfield
 
VLC 2027:
 
IAC:
Bullis - Navy (D), Penn (M), St. Joseph's (LSM)
GP - Princeton (M), Brown (A), Johns Hopkins (Midfield), Navy (A), Holy Cross (M)
Landon - Dartmouth (LSM), Cornell (D), Delaware (LSM), Georgetown (A)
STA - Brown (D)
 
WCAC:
SJC - AF (D), Navy (M), MD (FOGO), Villanova (LSM), Penn State (A/M), Bucknell (D)
DM - AF (G)
GC - Cornell (M), Delaware (D)
GZ - Providence (M), Colgate (M)
 
MAC:

Public:
Yorktown - Penn State (A)

Others:
Deerfield - Michigan (D), Michigan (M)
Highland Park HS - Army (FOGO)
Taft - Ohio State (A)
St. Christophers - Bucknell (D), Bucknell (G)

We all know VLC lost the 2027 class why list it? VLC will be strong 2030 to 2034

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone should listen to the IL recruiting podcast with York coach. He basically said recruiting process for D1 is heavily focused on the top showcases and top clubs. If you are not involved with those two things then getting recruited at D1 is challenging. The recruiting process is broken because getting into the top showcases is partially about who you know. Getting on to the top club teams is geography. Finding that “special” player not in those circles takes a lot of effort and coaches don’t have the time.

All of this talk sounds like FOMO. The truth is the system works because top coaches can spot talent. It is not 100% but neither is the NFL. Look at the local players from 2019-2024 who were highly recruited. They were also the top HS players. Coaches did not miss any player i can think of.

+1
I just took a peek at the UVA roster and they show 45 players, of which 9 (i.e., 20%) are from public school. the coaches will find the best players no matter where they come from.

Can you identify the 9? AI only says 3. Also, last year's roster had around 55 players so I don't think you have accurate information. There is an absolute bias for privates over publics and the reasons are many and systemic (super hot catchword).

Not the OP but you can pull up the roster with the touch of a few buttons and count them yourself, they list the high school with each player. And there are actually 10.
No idea what last year having a bigger roster has to do with anything, but they didn't have 55 (again, you can count them yourself) and 17 were from publics. But again, don't understand your point about why last year is disqualifying.

Typical dcum dbag. Dude, not everyone knows a public school from the private. No need for the snark when someone asks a question.

Nah, stfu. You said somebody was wrong when in actuality you were. Your source and backup was AI. You wanted someone else to do your homework and prove themselves after all of that nonsense. Take the L and move on.

More dbaggery.

You sound like you're 14. I swear 95% of the people on here think they know everything when they might know 5%. Then they feel entitled to have others prove their own b.s.. Next time, just look things that are easy up yourself. You'll sound smarter. You're welcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Plus the star rating process says right there on the website you can pay for a rating??!! Nothing smells about that at all.

In all fairness, it's paying for an evaluation - not a rating. Still a money grab, but not paying for a rating.

It’s a scam that prays on wealthy lax familes. No one who pays for a rating gets less than 3 stars

You don't get any stars when you pay. You get an evaluation. They are different things.

Find us someone - anyone - who paid for the evaluation and didn’t get a 3 star rating. Bottom line, you’re paying for the 3 star rating. If your kid is really good, he’ll get 4 or even 5. But once you’ve paid, all he has to do is stand upright and it’s a 3 star rating. Money talks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone should listen to the IL recruiting podcast with York coach. He basically said recruiting process for D1 is heavily focused on the top showcases and top clubs. If you are not involved with those two things then getting recruited at D1 is challenging. The recruiting process is broken because getting into the top showcases is partially about who you know. Getting on to the top club teams is geography. Finding that “special” player not in those circles takes a lot of effort and coaches don’t have the time.

All of this talk sounds like FOMO. The truth is the system works because top coaches can spot talent. It is not 100% but neither is the NFL. Look at the local players from 2019-2024 who were highly recruited. They were also the top HS players. Coaches did not miss any player i can think of.

+1
I just took a peek at the UVA roster and they show 45 players, of which 9 (i.e., 20%) are from public school. the coaches will find the best players no matter where they come from.

Can you identify the 9? AI only says 3. Also, last year's roster had around 55 players so I don't think you have accurate information. There is an absolute bias for privates over publics and the reasons are many and systemic (super hot catchword).

Not the OP but you can pull up the roster with the touch of a few buttons and count them yourself, they list the high school with each player. And there are actually 10.
No idea what last year having a bigger roster has to do with anything, but they didn't have 55 (again, you can count them yourself) and 17 were from publics. But again, don't understand your point about why last year is disqualifying.

Typical dcum dbag. Dude, not everyone knows a public school from the private. No need for the snark when someone asks a question.

Nah, stfu. You said somebody was wrong when in actuality you were. Your source and backup was AI. You wanted someone else to do your homework and prove themselves after all of that nonsense. Take the L and move on.

More dbaggery.

You sound like you're 14. I swear 95% of the people on here think they know everything when they might know 5%. Then they feel entitled to have others prove their own b.s.. Next time, just look things that are easy up yourself. You'll sound smarter. You're welcome.

Keep digging loser

[Anonymous]

We all know VLC lost the 2027 class why list it?

VLC didn't have a 2027 in 8th grade, maybe, but they re-formed. It's not a great team but there are some good players playing well on their high school squads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:IAC is fraying. If one of their teams jumps ship for MAC or WCAC then maybe IAC will try to expand by picking up Heights.

My crystal ball shows the following:

Prep goes independent. (Hoyas want nothing to do with the WCAC)

St Stephen's joins the MAC

EHS is already a member of the VISAA so they are fine.

Landon, STA and Bullis join the MIAA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone should listen to the IL recruiting podcast with York coach. He basically said recruiting process for D1 is heavily focused on the top showcases and top clubs. If you are not involved with those two things then getting recruited at D1 is challenging. The recruiting process is broken because getting into the top showcases is partially about who you know. Getting on to the top club teams is geography. Finding that “special” player not in those circles takes a lot of effort and coaches don’t have the time.

All of this talk sounds like FOMO. The truth is the system works because top coaches can spot talent. It is not 100% but neither is the NFL. Look at the local players from 2019-2024 who were highly recruited. They were also the top HS players. Coaches did not miss any player i can think of.

+1
I just took a peek at the UVA roster and they show 45 players, of which 9 (i.e., 20%) are from public school. the coaches will find the best players no matter where they come from.

Can you identify the 9? AI only says 3. Also, last year's roster had around 55 players so I don't think you have accurate information. There is an absolute bias for privates over publics and the reasons are many and systemic (super hot catchword).

Not the OP but you can pull up the roster with the touch of a few buttons and count them yourself, they list the high school with each player. And there are actually 10.
No idea what last year having a bigger roster has to do with anything, but they didn't have 55 (again, you can count them yourself) and 17 were from publics. But again, don't understand your point about why last year is disqualifying.

Typical dcum dbag. Dude, not everyone knows a public school from the private. No need for the snark when someone asks a question.

Nah, stfu. You said somebody was wrong when in actuality you were. Your source and backup was AI. You wanted someone else to do your homework and prove themselves after all of that nonsense. Take the L and move on.

More dbaggery.

You sound like you're 14. I swear 95% of the people on here think they know everything when they might know 5%. Then they feel entitled to have others prove their own b.s.. Next time, just look things that are easy up yourself. You'll sound smarter. You're welcome.

Keep digging loser

???? There's no digging.
Here's you:
"Can you identify the 9? AI only says 3. Also, last year's roster had around 55 players so I don't think you have accurate information. There is an absolute bias for privates over publics and the reasons are many and systemic (super hot catchword). "

- He had pretty accurate information
- You were too lazy to do anything beyond "AI" and then said he was wrong.
- I corrected.you.
- You admitted you don't even know publics from privates in a subsequent post.
- You talk behind a keyboard in a manner you wouldn't dare to, face to face.

Find another hobby.

[Anonymous]

NL to Villanova (SJC)

[Anonymous]

DC Express 2027:
1 Navy (Bullis) Defense
1 St. Joseph's (Bullis) LSM
1 Holy Cross (GP) Midfield
 
Next Level 2027:
1 Michigan (Deerfield) Defense
1 Cornell (GC) Midfield
1 Dartmouth (Landon) LSM
1 Penn (Bullis) Midfield 
1 Cornell (Landon) Defense 
1 Brown (STA) Defense
1 Delaware (Landon) LSM
1 Brown (GP) Attack
1 Bucknell (STC) Goalie
1 Georgetown (Landon) Attack
1 Johns Hokpkins (GP) Midfield
1 Villanova (SJC) Attack

 
Madlax 2027:
1 AF (SJC) Defense
1 Army (HP-TX) FOGO
1 Penn State (Yorktown) Attack
1 Princeton (GP) Midfield
1 Delaware (GC) Defense 
1 Villanova (SJC) LSM
1 Michigan (Deerfield) Midfield
1 Penn State (SJC) Attack/Midfield
1 Ohio State (Taft) Attack
1 Bucknell (STC) Defense
1 Bucknell (SJC) Defense
1 Providence (GZ) SSDM
1 Colgate (GZ) Midfield
 
VLC 2027:
 
IAC:
Bullis - Navy (D), Penn (M), St. Joseph's (LSM)
GP - Princeton (M), Brown (A), Johns Hopkins (Midfield), Navy (A), Holy Cross (M)
Landon - Dartmouth (LSM), Cornell (D), Delaware (LSM), Georgetown (A)
STA - Brown (D)
 
WCAC:
SJC - AF (D), Navy (M), MD (FOGO), Villanova (LSM), Penn State (A/M), Bucknell (D), Villanova (A)
DM - AF (G)
GC - Cornell (M), Delaware (D)
GZ - Providence (M), Colgate (M)
 
MAC:

Public:
Yorktown - Penn State (A)

Others:
Deerfield - Michigan (D), Michigan (M)
Highland Park HS - Army (FOGO)
Taft - Ohio State (A)
St. Christophers - Bucknell (D), Bucknell (G)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone should listen to the IL recruiting podcast with York coach. He basically said recruiting process for D1 is heavily focused on the top showcases and top clubs. If you are not involved with those two things then getting recruited at D1 is challenging. The recruiting process is broken because getting into the top showcases is partially about who you know. Getting on to the top club teams is geography. Finding that “special” player not in those circles takes a lot of effort and coaches don’t have the time.

All of this talk sounds like FOMO. The truth is the system works because top coaches can spot talent. It is not 100% but neither is the NFL. Look at the local players from 2019-2024 who were highly recruited. They were also the top HS players. Coaches did not miss any player i can think of.

+1
I just took a peek at the UVA roster and they show 45 players, of which 9 (i.e., 20%) are from public school. the coaches will find the best players no matter where they come from.

Can you identify the 9? AI only says 3. Also, last year's roster had around 55 players so I don't think you have accurate information. There is an absolute bias for privates over publics and the reasons are many and systemic (super hot catchword).

Not the OP but you can pull up the roster with the touch of a few buttons and count them yourself, they list the high school with each player. And there are actually 10.
No idea what last year having a bigger roster has to do with anything, but they didn't have 55 (again, you can count them yourself) and 17 were from publics. But again, don't understand your point about why last year is disqualifying.

Typical dcum dbag. Dude, not everyone knows a public school from the private. No need for the snark when someone asks a question.

Nah, stfu. You said somebody was wrong when in actuality you were. Your source and backup was AI. You wanted someone else to do your homework and prove themselves after all of that nonsense. Take the L and move on.

More dbaggery.

You sound like you're 14. I swear 95% of the people on here think they know everything when they might know 5%. Then they feel entitled to have others prove their own b.s.. Next time, just look things that are easy up yourself. You'll sound smarter. You're welcome.

Keep digging loser

???? There's no digging.
Here's you:
"Can you identify the 9? AI only says 3. Also, last year's roster had around 55 players so I don't think you have accurate information. There is an absolute bias for privates over publics and the reasons are many and systemic (super hot catchword). "

- He had pretty accurate information
- You were too lazy to do anything beyond "AI" and then said he was wrong.
- I corrected.you.
- You admitted you don't even know publics from privates in a subsequent post.
- You talk behind a keyboard in a manner you wouldn't dare to, face to face.

Find another hobby.

Like most things on DCUM, the initial post and response are a mix on incorrect, out of context and inaccurate.
10 players currently on the UVA mens roster attended a public HS.
Of those 10, 2 are transfers (Bryant and Colgate), so really 8 recruited public school players.
Digging a little deeper, one player each from Garden City, Manhasset, Ridgefield, Chatam, and Rumson-Fair Haven, all could be considered NYC suburbs and very affluent
Throw in the regional players from TX (Dallas) and AL (Mobile) and you have 7/8 recruited public school players.
Most meaningful to the DCUM crowd, is only one VA public school player (Riverside). UVA has never spent much time recruiting the VA publics, would be nice to see an increase in that area.

[Anonymous]

SJC college is killing it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SJC college is killing it!

They just don’t kill it on the field!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone should listen to the IL recruiting podcast with York coach. He basically said recruiting process for D1 is heavily focused on the top showcases and top clubs. If you are not involved with those two things then getting recruited at D1 is challenging. The recruiting process is broken because getting into the top showcases is partially about who you know. Getting on to the top club teams is geography. Finding that “special” player not in those circles takes a lot of effort and coaches don’t have the time.

All of this talk sounds like FOMO. The truth is the system works because top coaches can spot talent. It is not 100% but neither is the NFL. Look at the local players from 2019-2024 who were highly recruited. They were also the top HS players. Coaches did not miss any player i can think of.

+1
I just took a peek at the UVA roster and they show 45 players, of which 9 (i.e., 20%) are from public school. the coaches will find the best players no matter where they come from.

Can you identify the 9? AI only says 3. Also, last year's roster had around 55 players so I don't think you have accurate information. There is an absolute bias for privates over publics and the reasons are many and systemic (super hot catchword).

Not the OP but you can pull up the roster with the touch of a few buttons and count them yourself, they list the high school with each player. And there are actually 10.
No idea what last year having a bigger roster has to do with anything, but they didn't have 55 (again, you can count them yourself) and 17 were from publics. But again, don't understand your point about why last year is disqualifying.

Typical dcum dbag. Dude, not everyone knows a public school from the private. No need for the snark when someone asks a question.

Nah, stfu. You said somebody was wrong when in actuality you were. Your source and backup was AI. You wanted someone else to do your homework and prove themselves after all of that nonsense. Take the L and move on.

More dbaggery.

You sound like you're 14. I swear 95% of the people on here think they know everything when they might know 5%. Then they feel entitled to have others prove their own b.s.. Next time, just look things that are easy up yourself. You'll sound smarter. You're welcome.

Keep digging loser

???? There's no digging.
Here's you:
"Can you identify the 9? AI only says 3. Also, last year's roster had around 55 players so I don't think you have accurate information. There is an absolute bias for privates over publics and the reasons are many and systemic (super hot catchword). "

- He had pretty accurate information
- You were too lazy to do anything beyond "AI" and then said he was wrong.
- I corrected.you.
- You admitted you don't even know publics from privates in a subsequent post.
- You talk behind a keyboard in a manner you wouldn't dare to, face to face.

Find another hobby.

You are such a clown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SJC college is killing it!

Every new commitment SJC gets makes the ryken alumni story ten years from now that much better

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC college is killing it!

Every new commitment SJC gets makes the ryken alumni story ten years from now that much better

I guess your goal is to either be the next Al Bundy with great HS stories or it can be to get your kid into the best possible university for their future. Speaks is clearly crushing the latter and it’s obviously hurting you each time it occurs.