trust me, we WISH it was https://mynorthwest.com/3950467/jason-rantz-seattle-english-high-school-students-white-supremacy-reading-writing/ |
guess you also missed this - to be fair it was a few years ago, which is almost a lifetime https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rational-thinking-hard-work-are-white-values-1518333 |
Don’t forget this gem https://mynorthwest.com/2604518/rantz-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-bankrolls-math-is-racist-lunacy/ |
silly rabbit, don't you know that the best way to help people of color do better and earn more money is to make sure they hate math? |
I'm so jealous of the people who think examples like these are made up
I wish I could get back to that place but I know too much |
Citing a conservative talk radio host's op-ed as "evidence," lollllll at you. |
is the Smithsonian mainstream enough for you? |
and.... here's some more for you just trying to help you become more culturally competent https://www.slowboring.com/p/tema-okun |
More op-eds. Yawn. |
To clarify a few things: I am the PP who doesn’t like a lot of DEI programming because a lot of it is anti-labor and seems designed to prevent class-based solidarity. I also agree with the posts that observe that OP and a lot of private school DEI defenders are utter hypocrites who are uninterested in doing anything actually hard to change inequity. I suspect they would bitterly fight any private school union efforts.
What I am not at all opposed to is teaching children the accurate violent history of slavery, men’s violence against women, or teaching children about diverse authors, etc. But that has to come with willingness to teach critical thinking and be willing to accept dissent, and I see little evidence that is happening now. What badly done DEI does is suppress dissent, particularly dissent that strays out of a narrowly tailored corporatist framework. I hate the self-congratulatory delusion that comes with private school DEI, where proponents like OP are all pretending that these schools are remotely egalitarian to begin with. Let’s be honest: no DEI proponent who sends their child to a $50k/year private school (or who moves to “good” school districts) is actually truly interested in the implementation of equity. Of course they aren’t: that would mean giving up actual privilege rather than, like OP, just blathering endlessly about privilege. So I’m against a lot of it, because I think a lot of the formal programs are really just hypocritical grifts meant to make its proponents be able to excuse their own sharp-fingered opportunity hoarding. I would prefer honesty and debate over dishonest grift. |
Same old "lIbErAlS cAn'T hAvE mOnEy oR aTtEnD pRiVaTe ScHoOlS" trope. |
I bet the middle 50% of the political spectrum feels about like this |
Well, their hypocrisy is of course fair game. |
So no evidence of this happening in a DC area private school (the topic of this thread)? |
I don't like your facts so I'm changing the scope of the thread to some very small corner because I can't refute the claims! |