Anyone following the viral Harvard University *Extension School* controversy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

No, you want her to get a pass because of her race. Have some integrity and stop setting the bar so low. That is racist.

You are a racist piece of shit and you don’t know the history. Since the moment she was appointed she faced those “she got it because DEI/low bar” comments. It’s the same nasty, racist comments that insinuate some students who are admitted don’t deserve to be there because some cram school Asian kid with a 1600 SAT but no personality or anything to offer the cohort got rejected. It’s beyond disgusting.

But Gay was under fire for getting the role over other “more qualified” candidates long before the testimony. And that was 100% about her race.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

No, you want her to get a pass because of her race. Have some integrity and stop setting the bar so low. That is racist.

You are a racist piece of shit and you don’t know the history. Since the moment she was appointed she faced those “she got it because DEI/low bar” comments. It’s the same nasty, racist comments that insinuate some students who are admitted don’t deserve to be there because some cram school Asian kid with a 1600 SAT but no personality or anything to offer the cohort got rejected. It’s beyond disgusting.

But Gay was under fire for getting the role over other “more qualified” candidates long before the testimony. And that was 100% about her race.

Oh won’t someone think of the poor struggling Asian kids who were denied their elite university birthright

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

No, you want her to get a pass because of her race. Have some integrity and stop setting the bar so low. That is racist.

You are a racist piece of shit and you don’t know the history. Since the moment she was appointed she faced those “she got it because DEI/low bar” comments. It’s the same nasty, racist comments that insinuate some students who are admitted don’t deserve to be there because some cram school Asian kid with a 1600 SAT but no personality or anything to offer the cohort got rejected. It’s beyond disgusting.

But Gay was under fire for getting the role over other “more qualified” candidates long before the testimony. And that was 100% about her race.

Because she wasn't qualified for the job. Sorry that stings. But, that's been resolved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

No, you want her to get a pass because of her race. Have some integrity and stop setting the bar so low. That is racist.

You are a racist piece of shit and you don’t know the history. Since the moment she was appointed she faced those “she got it because DEI/low bar” comments. It’s the same nasty, racist comments that insinuate some students who are admitted don’t deserve to be there because some cram school Asian kid with a 1600 SAT but no personality or anything to offer the cohort got rejected. It’s beyond disgusting.

But Gay was under fire for getting the role over other “more qualified” candidates long before the testimony. And that was 100% about her race.

Oh won’t someone think of the poor struggling Asian kids who were denied their elite university birthright

I guess I feel about as much sadness for cheats and liars who plagiarize to get jobs they don't deserve as you feel for hardworking kids who got rejected from a school they worked hard to get in to. Life isn't always fair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

At some level you’re correct. It does have something to do with her race, and honestly gender. If she hadn’t been a black woman there’s a 0% chance she’s even in this position. So ultimately, you’re probably correct, just not for the reasons you assume.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Harvard got some splash back on this. The HES Professor who mocked HES grads for thinking they have a Harvard degree has now been asked to “clarify:”

https://x.com/Jenniferhochsc2/status/1745912823689973880?s=20

I was asked to clarify, and am glad to do so: HES courses are Harvard U courses (often the same as in FAS, as for my courses). HES bachelor’s and master’s degrees are Harvard U degrees. HES is a school in Harvard U analogous to other schools. HES students are Harvard U students

She’s still posting non-apology apologies:

https://x.com/jenniferhochsc2/status/1746099757766824374?s=61&t=0L5nhzrbcJwFfJRjPVpsvA

On this maelstrom, mainly to HES students/staff: I regret that you got dragged into a dispute with nothing to do with you, that caused distress.I endorse and admire HES’s promotion of an inclusive, engaged, ambitious student body. I'm sorry my writing seemed to suggest otherwise.

Presumably Harvard is making her post these. I bet they were approved by legal counsel. Congratulations to Rufo.

It’s just the absurdity of it. When exactly did she realize that in her zeal to mean tweet Rufo she was actually sh*tting all over the students and institution that pay her salary? It’s all very Michael Scott. Reason 4765 why academics should stay far away from Twitter…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Harvard got some splash back on this. The HES Professor who mocked HES grads for thinking they have a Harvard degree has now been asked to “clarify:”

https://x.com/Jenniferhochsc2/status/1745912823689973880?s=20

I was asked to clarify, and am glad to do so: HES courses are Harvard U courses (often the same as in FAS, as for my courses). HES bachelor’s and master’s degrees are Harvard U degrees. HES is a school in Harvard U analogous to other schools. HES students are Harvard U students

Hilarious. What a clown.

Yes, at this point I think many of us are aware that Harvard is no longer deserving of the prestige it used to have. Very clownish.

Like I’ve said for the entire thread. HES is Harvard. An ALM from Harvard is truthfully and correctly described as a masters degree from Harvard.

So out in the open then: that more than anything, what it takes is money.

Lol, the delusion with this poster. That’s some sort of weird narrative. Harvard’s prestige is perfectly fine. It’s Rufo and Ackman who have been humbled. And Stefanik’s time is coming.

Exactly what is delusional? HES is just pay to play. It’s basically open admissions. And now Harvard is forced to say they’re getting a degree with the same status as all the kids who won the lottery to the regular college.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

No, you want her to get a pass because of her race. Have some integrity and stop setting the bar so low. That is racist.

You are a racist piece of shit and you don’t know the history. Since the moment she was appointed she faced those “she got it because DEI/low bar” comments. It’s the same nasty, racist comments that insinuate some students who are admitted don’t deserve to be there because some cram school Asian kid with a 1600 SAT but no personality or anything to offer the cohort got rejected. It’s beyond disgusting.

But Gay was under fire for getting the role over other “more qualified” candidates long before the testimony. And that was 100% about her race.

Yes, that was amazing. Talk about a lack of self-awareness. I suppose that’s typical for racists like the PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

No, you want her to get a pass because of her race. Have some integrity and stop setting the bar so low. That is racist.

You are a racist piece of shit and you don’t know the history. Since the moment she was appointed she faced those “she got it because DEI/low bar” comments. It’s the same nasty, racist comments that insinuate some students who are admitted don’t deserve to be there because some cram school Asian kid with a 1600 SAT but no personality or anything to offer the cohort got rejected. It’s beyond disgusting.

But Gay was under fire for getting the role over other “more qualified” candidates long before the testimony. And that was 100% about her race.

Because she wasn't qualified for the job. Sorry that stings. But, that's been resolved.

Oh she was more than qualified. She got lynched.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

No, you want her to get a pass because of her race. Have some integrity and stop setting the bar so low. That is racist.

You are a racist piece of shit and you don’t know the history. Since the moment she was appointed she faced those “she got it because DEI/low bar” comments. It’s the same nasty, racist comments that insinuate some students who are admitted don’t deserve to be there because some cram school Asian kid with a 1600 SAT but no personality or anything to offer the cohort got rejected. It’s beyond disgusting.

But Gay was under fire for getting the role over other “more qualified” candidates long before the testimony. And that was 100% about her race.

Because she wasn't qualified for the job. Sorry that stings. But, that's been resolved.

Oh she was more than qualified. She got lynched.

😳😳😳😳

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

At some level you’re correct. It does have something to do with her race, and honestly gender. If she hadn’t been a black woman there’s a 0% chance she’s even in this position. So ultimately, you’re probably correct, just not for the reasons you assume.

So you agree a black woman would never be considered, let alone chosen as Harvard president absent a commitment to inclusivity and equity and diversity? That’s why these programs are good — correct historical sins and ensure other perspectives get an opportunity. The only people who object to this are racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

At some level you’re correct. It does have something to do with her race, and honestly gender. If she hadn’t been a black woman there’s a 0% chance she’s even in this position. So ultimately, you’re probably correct, just not for the reasons you assume.

So you agree a black woman would never be considered, let alone chosen as Harvard president absent a commitment to inclusivity and equity and diversity? That’s why these programs are good — correct historical sins and ensure other perspectives get an opportunity. The only people who object to this are racist.

No, I’m speaking exclusively about “this” black woman. Unlike most on the left, I try to treat everyone as an individual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Harvard got some splash back on this. The HES Professor who mocked HES grads for thinking they have a Harvard degree has now been asked to “clarify:”

https://x.com/Jenniferhochsc2/status/1745912823689973880?s=20

I was asked to clarify, and am glad to do so: HES courses are Harvard U courses (often the same as in FAS, as for my courses). HES bachelor’s and master’s degrees are Harvard U degrees. HES is a school in Harvard U analogous to other schools. HES students are Harvard U students

Hilarious. What a clown.

Yes, at this point I think many of us are aware that Harvard is no longer deserving of the prestige it used to have. Very clownish.

Like I’ve said for the entire thread. HES is Harvard. An ALM from Harvard is truthfully and correctly described as a masters degree from Harvard.

So out in the open then: that more than anything, what it takes is money.

Lol, the delusion with this poster. That’s some sort of weird narrative. Harvard’s prestige is perfectly fine. It’s Rufo and Ackman who have been humbled. And Stefanik’s time is coming.

Exactly what is delusional? HES is just pay to play. It’s basically open admissions. And now Harvard is forced to say they’re getting a degree with the same status as all the kids who won the lottery to the regular college.

I should have just gone to HES. 40k and a Harvard degree complete w graduation pictures. It's an awesome deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?? Gay is thankfully out and it has NOTHING to do with her race. You really need to stop it already.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire thing was motivated by grievances over DEI.

There’s no defending her. Even she knows this and resigned.

I was disputing the assertion this had nothing to do with her race.

It had everything to do with her race. The entire campaign and people harping on her since before the testimony. It had always been about her race. It’s ugly and racist.

No, you want her to get a pass because of her race. Have some integrity and stop setting the bar so low. That is racist.

You are a racist piece of shit and you don’t know the history. Since the moment she was appointed she faced those “she got it because DEI/low bar” comments. It’s the same nasty, racist comments that insinuate some students who are admitted don’t deserve to be there because some cram school Asian kid with a 1600 SAT but no personality or anything to offer the cohort got rejected. It’s beyond disgusting.

But Gay was under fire for getting the role over other “more qualified” candidates long before the testimony. And that was 100% about her race.

Too funny

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Harvard got some splash back on this. The HES Professor who mocked HES grads for thinking they have a Harvard degree has now been asked to “clarify:”

https://x.com/Jenniferhochsc2/status/1745912823689973880?s=20

I was asked to clarify, and am glad to do so: HES courses are Harvard U courses (often the same as in FAS, as for my courses). HES bachelor’s and master’s degrees are Harvard U degrees. HES is a school in Harvard U analogous to other schools. HES students are Harvard U students

Hilarious. What a clown.

Yes, at this point I think many of us are aware that Harvard is no longer deserving of the prestige it used to have. Very clownish.

Like I’ve said for the entire thread. HES is Harvard. An ALM from Harvard is truthfully and correctly described as a masters degree from Harvard.

So out in the open then: that more than anything, what it takes is money.

Lol, the delusion with this poster. That’s some sort of weird narrative. Harvard’s prestige is perfectly fine. It’s Rufo and Ackman who have been humbled. And Stefanik’s time is coming.

Exactly what is delusional? HES is just pay to play. It’s basically open admissions. And now Harvard is forced to say they’re getting a degree with the same status as all the kids who won the lottery to the regular college.

Harvard was saying that long before this controversy. That’s what it was selling. Harvard got greedy, in other words, and now has to face the consequences.