Met Gala fashion, anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Janelle Monae, also got the assignment!

Love her, she is everything! Breathtakingly gorgeous!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Boring makeup boring hair boring dress.

It's the point. In recent weeks, she's had a series of high profile hit pieces criticizing her enjoyment of ill-gotten riches, and her penchant for cosmetic enhancements and sartorial get ups. This is her answer: I can be boring too. Except that the bosom will out and she couldn't resist the mermaid look.

I get what you're saying, but to me the antidote to those stories is to show up looking elegant and discreet. This look doesn't move her reputation forward at all.

Ha. This IS her version of elegant and discreet, PP. She is at heart a vulgar person, and her body is a little wide for the usual "slim elegance" looks. If she were to cover that bosom with a flowy top, she'd look fat. She's also very warm and kind-hearted in real life, BTW, so I don't want to be too mean. I don't mean vulgar in a moral sense, but in a visual sense. She just doesn't understand subtlety and restraint.

Do you know her in real life? She doesn't seem to understand philanthropy or giving back, which is a big indicator of being kind-hearted. She does seem sort of fun though

She sponsored the event but ok

Oh come on. She sponsored the event because she gets something out of that too. It's not like they just donated the money without strings.

You didn’t sponsor it. You could’ve gotten something out of it as well

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Absolutely gorgeous

No. I refuse to be gaslit. This looks like a very ugly, malnourished man. A skid row junkie, at that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

She looks like Jared Kushner in a wig.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

You seem to not like the waif look. I can almost guarantee you that this person has not had plastic surgery. Maybe they're on weight loss drugs, however. The two looks you dissed are my two favorites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

Ok, weirdo. You sound pleasant. Gracie Abrams is gorgeous, as is her gown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

You seem to not like the waif look. I can almost guarantee you that this person has not had plastic surgery. Maybe they're on weight loss drugs, however. The two looks you dissed are my two favorites.

+1
Gracie Abrams is just a very slender person, something that really annoys trolls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Absolutely gorgeous

No. I refuse to be gaslit. This looks like a very ugly, malnourished man. A skid row junkie, at that.

I don’t know who that is and my comment is only about her dress and her figure. The dress is gorgeous and looks great on her figure. Her face…. Eh.

[Anonymous]

As usual, I think the Kar/Jenners looked stunning!

Kris looked so. young.
Kim looked impeccable w/her blonde locks + tight dress.

But Kylie…..!!
She was the Queen.
Everything, her hairstyle, makeup and dress was beautiful to see….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kidman has finally lost the age battle with her face. No complaints, she had a great run.

She's lost nothing, she looks great.

+1

I agree.
She looks amazing and stunning for a woman with four kids, two divorces behind her and pushing the big 6-0!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe it's an attempt to reference the Madam X portrait, but it's not well done.

As a woman of a particular age > she has aged wonderfully imo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As usual, I think the Kar/Jenners looked stunning!

Kris looked so. young.
Kim looked impeccable w/her blonde locks + tight dress.

But Kylie…..!!
She was the Queen.
Everything, her hairstyle, makeup and dress was beautiful to see….

I thought Kendall looked fantastic and got the reference immediately.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe it's an attempt to reference the Madam X portrait, but it's not well done.

As a woman of a particular age > she has aged wonderfully imo.

Has she though??

Because also as a woman of a particular age, I think aging well means aging. Not staving off aging via surgical interventions (and not insignificantly so). If someone were to say she seems to be using her considerable resources to surgically defy aging, she has a great team, etc. - sure OK.

She’s certainly not alone in that of course. But it would be nice if people continue to remember what actual aging does look like. Not aging poorly, but just aging like a normal human doing what they reasonably can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Absolutely gorgeous

No. I refuse to be gaslit. This looks like a very ugly, malnourished man. A skid row junkie, at that.

Not her, dummy, the dress.