Does anyone else think that Kate Middleton's wedding dress was a little dull?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought the hat fit well with Beatrice's eccentric personality. She and her sister may not be cookie cutter doll-like like Kate and Pippa but I think they are quite lovely girls nonetheless.

They seem like they would be a lot of fun in real life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All of you commenting on the hat are wrong. She actually had nothing to do with the design. Phillip Treacy did the whole thing, only knowing what her dress was like. Thats what he does...create things. he has come out to defend the hat as well.

I think it was ugly, but she had nothing to do with it.

Beatrice selected the hat. Actually, I really didn't imagine that Beatrice made the hat herself any more than I would weirdly think anyone at that wedding made their own outfits. The fact is, designers make these accessories and people select them sometimes based on how eccentric the design is. She could easily have refused to wear it if she did not like it or picked it because she found it amusing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of you commenting on the hat are wrong. She actually had nothing to do with the design. Phillip Treacy did the whole thing, only knowing what her dress was like. Thats what he does...create things. he has come out to defend the hat as well.

I think it was ugly, but she had nothing to do with it.

Beatrice selected the hat. Actually, I really didn't imagine that Beatrice made the hat herself any more than I would weirdly think anyone at that wedding made their own outfits. The fact is, designers make these accessories and people select them sometimes based on how eccentric the design is. She could easily have refused to wear it if she did not like it or picked it because she found it amusing.

Wrong! He made it for her without her input. Read up on the stories onine.

[Anonymous]

speaking of fergie's girls - did anyone else hear that they are no longer going to be protected 24-7? Apparently, they will now only get a detail at special events. I would be interested to see who else in line to the throne does not get 24-7 protection.

Yes, Fergie made her own bed on this one, honestly. Would you invite someone who was caught on tape trying to sell the family secrets to an event like that? Actually, can someone explain how she got so poor in the first place? I'm sure there are articles out there explaining it, but I haven't had time to look it up. Don't get me wrong - I always liked Fergie, but her latest scandal is pretty nasty, no matter how lousy that family has been to her in the past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:speaking of fergie's girls - did anyone else hear that they are no longer going to be protected 24-7? Apparently, they will now only get a detail at special events. I would be interested to see who else in line to the throne does not get 24-7 protection.

Yes, Fergie made her own bed on this one, honestly. Would you invite someone who was caught on tape trying to sell the family secrets to an event like that? Actually, can someone explain how she got so poor in the first place? I'm sure there are articles out there explaining it, but I haven't had time to look it up. Don't get me wrong - I always liked Fergie, but her latest scandal is pretty nasty, no matter how lousy that family has been to her in the past.

She had initially contracted on for Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew and then when the Royal Family found out they said they would completely disown her (not sure who actually still has contact with her) but I assume her children were furious.

[Anonymous]

http://tv.yahoo.com/blog/sarah-ferguson-tells-oprah-royal-wedding-snub-was-so-difficult--2938

[Anonymous]

Don't know if anyone's mentioned it yet but Fergies girls are fugly, just like the rest of the clan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don't know if anyone's mentioned it yet but Fergies girls are fugly, just like the rest of the clan.

And you've got a fugly soul. Or the soul of a teenage troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of you commenting on the hat are wrong. She actually had nothing to do with the design. Phillip Treacy did the whole thing, only knowing what her dress was like. Thats what he does...create things. he has come out to defend the hat as well.

I think it was ugly, but she had nothing to do with it.

Beatrice selected the hat. Actually, I really didn't imagine that Beatrice made the hat herself any more than I would weirdly think anyone at that wedding made their own outfits. The fact is, designers make these accessories and people select them sometimes based on how eccentric the design is. She could easily have refused to wear it if she did not like it or picked it because she found it amusing.

Wrong! He made it for her without her input. Read up on the stories onine.

Lol. You're absurd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't know if anyone's mentioned it yet but Fergies girls are fugly, just like the rest of the clan.

And you've got a fugly soul. Or the soul of a teenage troll.

Honestly, you must be having a very bad day. We all have our insecurities, but calling anyone's children ugly is beneath contempt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of you commenting on the hat are wrong. She actually had nothing to do with the design. Phillip Treacy did the whole thing, only knowing what her dress was like. Thats what he does...create things. he has come out to defend the hat as well.

I think it was ugly, but she had nothing to do with it.

Beatrice selected the hat. Actually, I really didn't imagine that Beatrice made the hat herself any more than I would weirdly think anyone at that wedding made their own outfits. The fact is, designers make these accessories and people select them sometimes based on how eccentric the design is. She could easily have refused to wear it if she did not like it or picked it because she found it amusing.

Wrong! He made it for her without her input. Read up on the stories onine.

Lol, still laughing at your absurdity. I never said she had input on making the hat. She simply agreed to wear it. I don't need to read some dirtrag blog online to figure that out.

[Anonymous]

Am I the only one who thinks Fergie and Andrew are still getting the groove on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't know if anyone's mentioned it yet but Fergies girls are fugly, just like the rest of the clan.

And you've got a fugly soul. Or the soul of a teenage troll.

Honestly, you must be having a very bad day. We all have our insecurities, but calling anyone's children ugly is beneath contempt.

You do know they are adult women?

[Anonymous]

Kate's dress was ok and her veil was ok, but neither suitable for a future queen. This girl had a choice of half a dozen or more stunning tiaras. She needed to wear one of them. Her dress and veil were both suitable for a country bride marrying the local milkman in the village church - this was a future king marrying a future queen. Simple is nice but its not for a royal wedding. The tiara was a non starter, almost apologetic, as if the wearer was uncomfortable with making a statement in diamonds. Also, the veil for that dress and in that cathedral should have had a cathedral length and should have trailed over the dress in layers. The veil and hair style lacked height at the back. The bouquet was too small and again needed to make a bigger statement. At a wedding where the groom is more ornate than the bride it is a shame nobody advised her - or perhaps someone did - Camilla!

[Anonymous]

Philip Treacy hats are ghastly - he is designing hats for weirdos and making them look even more strange than they did before they started wearing his ugly creations. His hats have the effect of making women look like farting peacocks - one expects them at any moment to start strutting around a barnyard.