The opposite of NIMBYism isn't residents (renters as well as owners) having no say in their neighborhoods. The opposite of NIMBYism is those residents actually saying YES to real possibilities, not just always always always NO. |
|
If you think DC is nothing but chains you clearly don't get out much.
Except for upper NW and EOTR, practically every neighborhood is packed with excellent non-chain options for eating, drinking, and shopping. In fact, I'd say DC has never had a better variety of independent businesses than right now. There might have been more in total numbers pre-68, but I guarantee you they were all the same old corner store, bar, deli, diner, italian, etc. Now we've got every cuisine imaginable in every price range. We've got neighborhood bars, cocktail lounges, tiki bars, bier halls, dance clubs, whiskey bars, rum bars, gin bars, craft beer bars, breweries, distilleries, anything you could possibly want with no need to ever visit a chain if you don't want to. And if you really miss the grit and grime of pre-2000s DC, you can always join us over here in Ward 7 and 8 with barely a chain to be seen. You'll save a bundle on your mortgage too! |
|
I think COVID has a lot to do with what is going on. Kids are not in school, if they get up to no good, there is no real enforcement, even those who do get into the system are popped out right away due to covid in jails, etc.
|
|
Agreed. I miss the drugs, assaults, mismanagement, and 482 murders in 1991.
Good times! |
Sorry, but over time I have become a fan of NIMBYs. Of course they should say yes to possibilities, but often neighborhood needs ARE run roughshod over by short sighted developers. NIMBYs are usually the best equipped to stay informed + advocate. |
I agree. DC is actually a foodie city now, and there is a lot of locally sourced stuff. It is important to keep supporting those eateries and businesses - like call Sullivans and pay the couple bucks surcharge for a toy before automatically ordering from Amazon, if you want them to stay around. |
and yet they never do. |
Don't even bother. It's obvious that they don't actually support choice or development of any kind, it's just a fig leaf so they can feel better about pricing out everyone who didn't have the foresight to be born before 1970. |
| OP, I have 20 years on you, and trust me when I say that those times were not the heyday you think they were. |
DC is dramatically better than it was 30 years ago. Much much safer. Much much better governance & schools. Much much better food scene. The biggest change to me is how many vibrant neighborhoods the city has now compared to when I arrived. Downtown DC used to be an absolute ghost town on evenings and weekends - to see a hockey or basketball game you had to drive 30 minutes from downtown and there was no baseball team and a lot of restaurants didn't even stay open on weekends. Any neighborhoods west of 16th Street NW were sketchy and lacking basic neighborhood amenities and were shedding population until the early oughts. The area around Nats stadium was mostly abandoned warehouses (though Trax was fun) and the SW Waterfront had more surface parking lots than anything else. DC did used to have a bit of a bohemian vibe that it is now completely lacking - art house movie theaters, coffee shops (Food for Thought), some genuine dive bars and of course you really could get by in DC on very low income as housing was much much cheaper and of course gentrification is a real thing. The old 9:30 club was a funky place with lots of character and I guess it was cool that you couldn't see the stage from about a third of the place but the new club is a vastly superior place to see a show. But I'm also struck by how much hasn't changed - I lived in Columbia Heights and Mt Pleasant in the early 90's and both neighborhoods still have some of the same vibes they had 30 years ago and even some of the same businesses. I really don't think you'd find very many people, of any race, when given an actual choice between DC circa 1990 and DC today who would chose 1990. There were some things about 1990 that were better (mostly related to affordability) but on balance DC is just so much nicer of a place than it was 30 years ago. BTW the chain stores are an issue absolutely everywhere and compared to most places DC is blessed with diverse and interesting locally owned businesses. |
| Real Property taxes. The higher the home value the more the tax bill and therefore the more revenue into the coffers of the govt. Thus is why gentrification will always be valued by a city. Same goes with sales tax. The more expensive the food, goods and services the higher the sales tax revenue. It’s called economic progress, and it’s the way of life and success. There are always a few dying cities around, so if you like regression or stagnation, then move there. |
|
Generic corporate takeover of retail isn’t unique to DC - it is the American way. Maybe if we didn’t worship big business and created opportunities for small business we’d see more local & unique.
|
Excellent post. I think I will copy and paste it any time someone trots out the tired argument that pre-revitalized DC was a better place than the city today. |
|
Be honest though.
Come election time you'll gleefully trot to the ballot box and vote in the same dullards. |
Yes, it is so tired. I worship Mayor Williams for jumpstarting revitalization. The DC gay community also gets a lot of credit. |