Interesting statements from Google Employee Jen Gennai

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And before anyone brings up 'free market', a search engine should be neutral, i.e. people enter data and they get results. When a company starts manipulating results, they have crossed the line into opinion media and should be broken up/regulated. Warren is right in this regard.

+1

google is removing the video as much and quickly as possible as are other media platforms.

Too late. We saw it. We know. We already suspected, but now we are sure.

The removal itself is evidence of truth. Given Gennai admitted it? All they can do now is try damage control.

The BBC aired a debate last year in the UK between Google, Facebook and a privacy advocate. It was remarkable.

Is there a transcript or video? That would be interesting

preferably one without the multiple "likes" scattered throughout

[Anonymous]

They even said that even if a statement such as CEOs are predominantly men was factual, it doesn’t meet the criteria for their source of truth databases called ‘MLTruth’ so it would be ‘algorithmic unfairness ‘ and needs to be modified

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Setting aside the political distortions.

The fact that Jen Gennai holds the view that large centralized entity such as Google is objectively better than a collection of smaller entities when it comes to matters of problem solving due to difference in resources is revealing on just how twisted her view on reality is. As has been demonstrated time and time again throughout the history of the western world, it is multiplicity and competition that brings out the best solutions, not centralized/consolidated power/resources.

So then why is the anti-trust division of DOJ basically sitting on its hands under this Administration? The GOP doesn't believe in competition. Duh. That's why entities like Verizon and NewsCorp get bigger and bigger, charging customers ever higher prices for sh#ttier service.

PP here, not liking something doesn't mean it's up to the government to "fix" it. Did anti-trust actions against Microsoft give birth to the iPhone and Android?

You: "The government should fix anti-competitive behaviors among large mega-companies."

Also, you: "The government should break up Google because it's too big!"

Funny how hypocrisy works.

[Anonymous]

Wait. Now Net Neutrality is wanted?

[Anonymous]

Google basing search algorithms on who they want elected is the problem, not their size.

[Anonymous]

All linked documents here:

https://www.projectveritas.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/SS1DocDump.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Google basing search algorithms on who they want elected is the problem, not their size.

Their size gives them unprecedented power

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Google basing search algorithms on who they want elected is the problem, not their size.

Their size gives them unprecedented power

True, but when did they start tailoring their search algorithm to reflect their political choices?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Google basing search algorithms on who they want elected is the problem, not their size.

Their size gives them unprecedented power

True, but when did they start tailoring their search algorithm to reflect their political choices?

Seems like Gennai is saying after Trump won, they stepped up their efforts so he would not win again

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those that are screaming for free speech are basically hate speech advocates.

Sorry, I would rather deny hate speech because it simply festers into violence against "the other."

You are free to voice your opinion however the Supreme Court reaffirmed there is no "hate speech" exception in the First Amendment. "But G**gle is is private company" you'll say. When private companies meddle in elections with the manipulation of algos, search results etc., they might just find themselves on someone with standings' last nerve.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And before anyone brings up 'free market', a search engine should be neutral, i.e. people enter data and they get results. When a company starts manipulating results, they have crossed the line into opinion media and should be broken up/regulated. Warren is right in this regard.

You mean, Trump is right.

Google is trying to support Dems like Warren.

[Anonymous]

Ted Cruz grills Google exec:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=31&v=q1YENAvOveE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And before anyone brings up 'free market', a search engine should be neutral, i.e. people enter data and they get results. When a company starts manipulating results, they have crossed the line into opinion media and should be broken up/regulated. Warren is right in this regard.

You mean, Trump is right.

Google is trying to support Dems like Warren.

Warren feels Google needs to be broken up/regulated. Google doesn't agree. Jen Gennai says so. Look it up.

[Anonymous]

Project Veritas and you suckers are taking this seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Project Veritas and you suckers are taking this seriously?

I know right? They were wrong about A.C.O.R.N. and -

oh wait. Veritas was 100% right on the scam-that-was ACORN.

They have been truthful on every other secret recording they have made - including the now-jailed activist who planned to sabotage the inauguration.

Google is operating as an unlicensed political lobbying organization.