Good News! Trump's Argentinian Project Magically Approved

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The report noted that there is no substantive indication that Trump’s conversation with Macri had anything to do with the project getting a green light

Nothing there.

Trump is building real projects with steel and concrete employing thousands of workers. When the project is done, we have a building to show for. Tell me what do we have to show for the millions of dollars that Qatar gave to Clinton Foundation? Anything to show for the millions of dollars of paid speeches?

lol... in Argentina. Very good of him. And do you think they are using American steel or Chinese ones? Considering he wants to pull out of NAFTA and TPP, more than likely, those global projects will be using all Chinese made steel.

Wait minute, isn't that Clinton's dream of "a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders"?

Why are you talking about Hillary after Trump lost but won the presidency? Talk about him without Hillary in the same sentence. Because he is the swamp now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a Trump supporter in any way.

That said, if you didn't object to the Clinton's money making through political connections, including while Hillary was SoS, just as objectionable then you are partisan hypocrites.

In a binary two party system, even assuming you are right and Hillary is corrupt, its a choice between trump who is corrupt a million times more and also being a sexist, racist, incompetent moron. By any yard stick Hillary is better off but the press created a false equivalence as if they both are equally worse. They are not. TRUMP WILL BE CHASED BY SCANDALS and will end his presidency in disgrace.

There is no degree of sin. Either one is corrupt or they aren't. Either one is a thief, or they aren't.

Bottom line for me, I found them both more than lacking in qualities I want in the WH so I cast my vote for someone I knew wouldn't get in there. And fwiw, imo, the press had little to do with it. Unless you want to believe, as some do, they stood Trump up early as a serious choice for Hillary to knock his sorry ass down in the general. And there might be some validity in that thought by those that believe it given her 'dinner' with the press group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The report noted that there is no substantive indication that Trump’s conversation with Macri had anything to do with the project getting a green light

Nothing there.

Trump is building real projects with steel and concrete employing thousands of workers. When the project is done, we have a building to show for. Tell me what do we have to show for the millions of dollars that Qatar gave to Clinton Foundation? Anything to show for the millions of dollars of paid speeches?

Yes, millions of AIDS patients were able to get AIDS medications that keep them alive.

http://www.politifact.com/global-news/statements/2016/jun/15/hillary-clinton/clinton-clinton-foundation-helped-9-million-lower-/

np

Isn't there anything else you people can point to? For all the money, why is that the one thing, which was collaborative, you point to?

The CF is a mixed bag and most supporters can't acknowledge things such as their selling memberships and giving a lot away to those who they personally took money from.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the Clinton Foundation.

Are you an idiot? Clinton is not the one who is POTUS. So are you fine with Trump corruption? As long as your guy is corrupt it is acceptable, right? You are not even getting any share of it? Are you? Heck, screw your sorry life, right? Its all about fucking the dems. As long as the dems are fucked you don't care if you are fucked even more. Welcome to trumpland.

You moron ..... the Clinton Foundation received tens of millions in contributions because Hillary was SoS.

The people giving the money were not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. Hillary did not get paid $250K for a 45 min speech because she had any particularly profound thoughts to impart.

I did not vote for Trump but to get on your high horse about Trump's ethics when we had Hillary as our nominee with her dubious ethics is a joke.

The joke is on you. Anything you claim is not subject to indictment until proven. BUT YOU HAVE TRUMP as the president now. Any talk of Hillary won't sell. Stop bringing Hillary in everytime trump is mentioned. Start talking about the king of the swamp and his corruption. Trump is the public person, Hillary is a private citizen. Get that through your thick, poorly educated self. Apply the same scrutiny you applied to Hillary as PUBLIC OFFICIAL to TRUMP the PUBLIC OFFICIAL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The report noted that there is no substantive indication that Trump’s conversation with Macri had anything to do with the project getting a green light

Nothing there.

Trump is building real projects with steel and concrete employing thousands of workers. When the project is done, we have a building to show for. Tell me what do we have to show for the millions of dollars that Qatar gave to Clinton Foundation? Anything to show for the millions of dollars of paid speeches?

We'll have a building? Are you a co-owner, you moron? It's Cheeto's personal business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a Trump supporter in any way.

That said, if you didn't object to the Clinton's money making through political connections, including while Hillary was SoS, just as objectionable then you are partisan hypocrites.

The CF was not her personal business. Unlike Trump, she didn't use the Foundation's money to pay her legal fees.

Seriously? Did I mention the CF? You don't think their political connections and her position entered into his personal income?

Not like his will for years and years.

They are all getting their pockets lined. My prediction is that the Obamas will pull in between 100 to 150 million over the next few years.

And that reminds me, Obama book sales while running and after he won election...substantial. "Five days before being sworn in as President in 2009, Obama secured a $500,000 advance for an abridged version of Dreams from My Father for middle-school-aged children"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The report noted that there is no substantive indication that Trump’s conversation with Macri had anything to do with the project getting a green light

Nothing there.

Trump is building real projects with steel and concrete employing thousands of workers. When the project is done, we have a building to show for. Tell me what do we have to show for the millions of dollars that Qatar gave to Clinton Foundation? Anything to show for the millions of dollars of paid speeches?

Yes, millions of AIDS patients were able to get AIDS medications that keep them alive.

http://www.politifact.com/global-news/statements/2016/jun/15/hillary-clinton/clinton-clinton-foundation-helped-9-million-lower-/

np

Isn't there anything else you people can point to? For all the money, why is that the one thing, which was collaborative, you point to?

The CF is a mixed bag and most supporters can't acknowledge things such as their selling memberships and giving a lot away to those who they personally took money from.

The election is over and trump is somehow the president elect now. You can't get away pointing to Hillary's alleged corruption and hiding Trump's ongoing corruption.

This won't be the first thing you hear about play for pay from the king of swamp. Even you can't bring Hillary everytime Trump's corruption is exposed because you will realize, hopefully, that are the conned idiot. Trump will laugh his way to the bank while you his voter won't get that promised manufacturing job or suffer from loss of healthcare coverage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the Clinton Foundation.

Are you an idiot? Clinton is not the one who is POTUS. So are you fine with Trump corruption? As long as your guy is corrupt it is acceptable, right? You are not even getting any share of it? Are you? Heck, screw your sorry life, right? Its all about fucking the dems. As long as the dems are fucked you don't care if you are fucked even more. Welcome to trumpland.

You moron ..... the Clinton Foundation received tens of millions in contributions because Hillary was SoS.

The people giving the money were not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. Hillary did not get paid $250K for a 45 min speech because she had any particularly profound thoughts to impart.

I did not vote for Trump but to get on your high horse about Trump's ethics when we had Hillary as our nominee with her dubious ethics is a joke.

And the Clinton Foundation put that money to a worthy cause - lowering the cost of AIDS medications for millions of patients around the world.

It also gives money to help prevent deforestation and runs and funds many other worthy programs.

http://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2016/6/23/what-the-heck-does-the-clinton-foundation-actually-do.html

I assume you also have a problem with the money Bush, Giuliani, Romney, Reagan, and yes TRUMP HIMSELF have made giving speeches, too, right? In fact, according to this Forbes list, Trump is #1 in cashing in on speakers fees: $1.5 MILLION per speech at the Learning Annex:

http://www.forbes.com/2008/03/18/trump-reagan-blair-biz-media-cx_lh_0318speeches_slide_2.html?thisspeed=20000

I have problems with anyone in public office or having left public office then cashing in through lobbying or other influence peddling. I don't care what their political ideology.

The Clintons are grifters and they have made tens of millions of dollars using the Foundation and don't tell me all that went to charitable purposes. I don't approve of Trump by any means but when he was making money giving speeches he had not come out of holding some public office.

Why do you guys have a problem with just acknowledging that the Clintons are just corrupt no matter how they choose to disguise it? As a liberal, for me the crying shame is that we actually nominated a piece of crap like Hillary to run for president and as a result we now have to live with Trump as president. Hillary was probably the only Democrat of any prominence that he could have beat and we made sure that we nominated her!

So enough with your sanctimonious b-s ....... Trump lacks ethics and the Clintons are just as bad if not worse.

[Anonymous]

There is a huge difference between the two. The Clinton Foundation income mostly, if not entirely, went to help other people in USA and all over the world. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that some of that money went to their personal coffees. Fact remains that MOST of the money went to help others

Trump's financial gains are going entirely to him and his family. Not helping another solitary human being, not even his most strident supporters.

[Anonymous]

Coffers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a Trump supporter in any way.

That said, if you didn't object to the Clinton's money making through political connections, including while Hillary was SoS, just as objectionable then you are partisan hypocrites.

The CF was not her personal business. Unlike Trump, she didn't use the Foundation's money to pay her legal fees.

Seriously? Did I mention the CF? You don't think their political connections and her position entered into his personal income?

Not like his will for years and years.

They are all getting their pockets lined. My prediction is that the Obamas will pull in between 100 to 150 million over the next few years.

And that reminds me, Obama book sales while running and after he won election...substantial. "Five days before being sworn in as President in 2009, Obama secured a $500,000 advance for an abridged version of Dreams from My Father for middle-school-aged children"

The topic is about TRUMP'S Corruption. Why are you so angry when OBAMA as PRIVATE CITIZEN makes money in a legal manner. Aren't you for trump the PRIVATE CITIZEN who made billions?

Trump is the president and will you apply the same scrutiny to him as you do for Hillary or Obama? If you don't then you are the conned idiot who got the man to become president so he makes billions while you defend his corruption.

[Anonymous]

Drain the swamp?! Wow by the end of Trump's first year the swamp's going to be looking quaint!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the Clinton Foundation.

Are you an idiot? Clinton is not the one who is POTUS. So are you fine with Trump corruption? As long as your guy is corrupt it is acceptable, right? You are not even getting any share of it? Are you? Heck, screw your sorry life, right? Its all about fucking the dems. As long as the dems are fucked you don't care if you are fucked even more. Welcome to trumpland.

You moron ..... the Clinton Foundation received tens of millions in contributions because Hillary was SoS.

The people giving the money were not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. Hillary did not get paid $250K for a 45 min speech because she had any particularly profound thoughts to impart.

I did not vote for Trump but to get on your high horse about Trump's ethics when we had Hillary as our nominee with her dubious ethics is a joke.

And the Clinton Foundation put that money to a worthy cause - lowering the cost of AIDS medications for millions of patients around the world.

It also gives money to help prevent deforestation and runs and funds many other worthy programs.

http://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2016/6/23/what-the-heck-does-the-clinton-foundation-actually-do.html

I assume you also have a problem with the money Bush, Giuliani, Romney, Reagan, and yes TRUMP HIMSELF have made giving speeches, too, right? In fact, according to this Forbes list, Trump is #1 in cashing in on speakers fees: $1.5 MILLION per speech at the Learning Annex:

http://www.forbes.com/2008/03/18/trump-reagan-blair-biz-media-cx_lh_0318speeches_slide_2.html?thisspeed=20000

I have problems with anyone in public office or having left public office then cashing in through lobbying or other influence peddling. I don't care what their political ideology.

The Clintons are grifters and they have made tens of millions of dollars using the Foundation and don't tell me all that went to charitable purposes. I don't approve of Trump by any means but when he was making money giving speeches he had not come out of holding some public office.

Why do you guys have a problem with just acknowledging that the Clintons are just corrupt no matter how they choose to disguise it? As a liberal, for me the crying shame is that we actually nominated a piece of crap like Hillary to run for president and as a result we now have to live with Trump as president. Hillary was probably the only Democrat of any prominence that he could have beat and we made sure that we nominated her!

So enough with your sanctimonious b-s ....... Trump lacks ethics and the Clintons are just as bad if not worse.

Not PP. You are the idiot pushing Trump's corruption under the rug while talking about tangential things. Didn't you get the MEMO, Trump is the swamp and the likes of you can't point finger at the dems anymore. Look at yourself and vote him out if he doesn't meet the standards you expected from Hillary or Obama. otherwise you are the S in BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a Trump supporter in any way.

That said, if you didn't object to the Clinton's money making through political connections, including while Hillary was SoS, just as objectionable then you are partisan hypocrites.

In a binary two party system, even assuming you are right and Hillary is corrupt, its a choice between trump who is corrupt a million times more and also being a sexist, racist, incompetent moron. By any yard stick Hillary is better off but the press created a false equivalence as if they both are equally worse. They are not. TRUMP WILL BE CHASED BY SCANDALS and will end his presidency in disgrace.

There is no degree of sin. Either one is corrupt or they aren't. Either one is a thief, or they aren't.

Bottom line for me, I found them both more than lacking in qualities I want in the WH so I cast my vote for someone I knew wouldn't get in there. And fwiw, imo, the press had little to do with it. Unless you want to believe, as some do, they stood Trump up early as a serious choice for Hillary to knock his sorry ass down in the general. And there might be some validity in that thought by those that believe it given her 'dinner' with the press group.

Bravo! You achieved your goal! Now you can sleep in peace while the country is swindled by the new owner of the swamp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any Trump supporter care to comment?

Why? It'll just be about Hillary.

Or the person who kept posting yesterday that whatever is good for Trump is good for the nation. In this case I don't know that anyone in the US cares particularly, but there will likely be other issues or decisions where what is good for Trump is not necessarily good for the nation ... but we all know which way Trump will choose on those matters.