Meghan Markle thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been many threads on here about individual women. One that was all about Melania and her body and how she dresses and other Trump related women. Others about Hilaria, Jolie, Paltrow, Aniston, and various other influencers and celebs etc.

And whoever posted that MM thread to start with wanted it to be all about her body. The first comment was - she looks amazing - because she is skinnier than she was before. It was a critique of her body from post 1.

Liar. Here's the OP in total: "She looks amazing! What kind of diet and exercise routine does she have?"

OP said nothing about her being skinnier than ever before. In fact that OP specifically asks about exercise, so that OP apparently thinks she looks fit and well-muscled, not "skinny." I've lost even more respect for you, if that's possible.

You can see in pictures that she is thinner than she was. So yes, that is what was amazing. She doesn't have any noticeable increase in muscle mass. The comment was about critiquing her body.

OP didn't provide pictures. She provided that single sentence. Again, OP didn't start a thread to critique Meghan's body. You lot sure piled on about it, though.

She looks amazing is a critique. She is scrutinizing her body and her perspective is that what she sees is amazing,other people see it differently. And I didn't pile on. I didn't even post in that thread.

You're silly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been many threads on here about individual women. One that was all about Melania and her body and how she dresses and other Trump related women. Others about Hilaria, Jolie, Paltrow, Aniston, and various other influencers and celebs etc.

And whoever posted that MM thread to start with wanted it to be all about her body. The first comment was - she looks amazing - because she is skinnier than she was before. It was a critique of her body from post 1.

Liar. Here's the OP in total: "She looks amazing! What kind of diet and exercise routine does she have?"

OP said nothing about her being skinnier than ever before. In fact that OP specifically asks about exercise, so that OP apparently thinks she looks fit and well-muscled, not "skinny." I've lost even more respect for you, if that's possible.

You can see in pictures that she is thinner than she was. So yes, that is what was amazing. She doesn't have any noticeable increase in muscle mass. The comment was about critiquing her body.

OP didn't provide pictures. She provided that single sentence. Again, OP didn't start a thread to critique Meghan's body. You lot sure piled on about it, though.

She looks amazing is a critique. She is scrutinizing her body and her perspective is that what she sees is amazing,other people see it differently. And I didn't pile on. I didn't even post in that thread.

You're silly.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are taking this waaaay too personally. Ever seen the Jen Hatmaker thread? It is at 870 pages!!! Perhaps your outrage should be directed there?

Relax about Meghan Markle and her thread. I promise you, she doesn't read the thread and wouldn't care. You are expending needless emotional energy on this.

I’m not the one spending my days reading Meghan hate subreddits and then rushing over to a mom’s website to regurgitate the bile….

I think you are responding to me? I didn’t read the thread nor do I follow her. I don’t care about the monarchy or the Kardashians, for that matter. But you need to get help with your extreme parasocial relationship.

The person with the parasocial relationship is the poster in that thread who says she spends an hour every evening before dinner scrolling through hate posts about Meghan so she can repost them on DCUM.

If you can't recognize bullying even when the bully admits it, you're beyond help. Carry on.

Here is a cookie. I'm keeping the thread alive so you can keep responding ad nauseum about bullying, Meghan Markle, other people are the ones that are insane...not me...blah blah blah blah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are taking this waaaay too personally. Ever seen the Jen Hatmaker thread? It is at 870 pages!!! Perhaps your outrage should be directed there?

Relax about Meghan Markle and her thread. I promise you, she doesn't read the thread and wouldn't care. You are expending needless emotional energy on this.

I’m not the one spending my days reading Meghan hate subreddits and then rushing over to a mom’s website to regurgitate the bile….

I think you are responding to me? I didn’t read the thread nor do I follow her. I don’t care about the monarchy or the Kardashians, for that matter. But you need to get help with your extreme parasocial relationship.

The person with the parasocial relationship is the poster in that thread who says she spends an hour every evening before dinner scrolling through hate posts about Meghan so she can repost them on DCUM.

If you can't recognize bullying even when the bully admits it, you're beyond help. Carry on.

Here is a cookie. I'm keeping the thread alive so you can keep responding ad nauseum about bullying, Meghan Markle, other people are the ones that are insane...not me...blah blah blah blah.

Troll admits to trolling. On your fourth glass of wine after spending your dinner "relaxing on your porch" and scrolling through hate socials to find things to post about Meghan on a mom's chat site. Maybe question your life choices and ask yourself how you got to such a very sad place.

[Anonymous]

This is such an odd discussion. I thought it would be a bit more classy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been many threads on here about individual women. One that was all about Melania and her body and how she dresses and other Trump related women. Others about Hilaria, Jolie, Paltrow, Aniston, and various other influencers and celebs etc.

And whoever posted that MM thread to start with wanted it to be all about her body. The first comment was - she looks amazing - because she is skinnier than she was before. It was a critique of her body from post 1.

Liar. Here's the OP in total: "She looks amazing! What kind of diet and exercise routine does she have?"

OP said nothing about her being skinnier than ever before. In fact that OP specifically asks about exercise, so that OP apparently thinks she looks fit and well-muscled, not "skinny." I've lost even more respect for you, if that's possible.

You can see in pictures that she is thinner than she was. So yes, that is what was amazing. She doesn't have any noticeable increase in muscle mass. The comment was about critiquing her body.

OP didn't provide pictures. She provided that single sentence. Again, OP didn't start a thread to critique Meghan's body. You lot sure piled on about it, though.

She looks amazing is a critique. She is scrutinizing her body and her perspective is that what she sees is amazing,other people see it differently. And I didn't pile on. I didn't even post in that thread.

Every time a negative critique gets posted in the beauty thread, there are tons of comments staying that anyone who objects should start their own thread why that person looks great (Usha comes to mind). Well that’s exactly what OP did. If you want to say Megan is terrible, go post on one of the many other threads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is such an odd discussion. I thought it would be a bit more classy.

LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like we should all care about misogynoir. But you do you.

Unless it's Republican women.

MAGA women have been subject to a years-long racist hate campaign? Well knock me over with a stick.

We have all seen the racism directed towards Winsome Sears ever since she entered politics.

The OP of this thread sounds like Meghan’s PR team.

Why do you keep repeating the nonsense about Meghan's PR time on the original thread and here? Surprise, some people actually like or admire Meghan as a businesswoman or fashion icon. Sit with that for a while and try to learn to live with it.

Also, as I posted on the other thread when you said the same thing, Meghan's PR team is in defense mode. It's William and Kate’s pr team who are notorious for controlling the royal rota (basically, the British press pack) by threatening to withhold access, and for spreading hate about Meghan whenever they need a deflection from things like Andrew’s latest scandal. Also, the Waleses deploy thousands of comments and upvote bots daily (Google “New York Times A Royal Instagram Mystery” for a quantitative analysis of the Waleses' social media). You're the tool here.

I’m not in the other thread. Have them check the IPs.

I don’t care about the BRF but I do care about speech. Wealthy public figures don’t get to silence free speech because people say mean comments they don’t like. I don’t care if it’s King Charles or Megan Markle. Go ahead and make a new thread trashing Charles or William.

Well then, you should care about Charles and William silencing the press from reporting unflattering things in return for granting or withholding accces to themselves. Here's a recent instance: https://www.thedailybeast.com/desperate-royals-tried-to-censor-leaked-kings-funeral-plans/?utm_medium=socialflow&via=twitter_page&utm_campaign=owned_social&utm_source=twitter_owned_tdb

[Anonymous]

Jeff already shut down the thread but I will say the last time there was a MM thread, someone admitted that they post DCUM threads about her in a forum called Tattle Life so those people can come over and spam the thread with anti-MM shit. Because of this, I just stop reading MM threads. I like her (I bought a bottle of her new champagne today) but there's no point in defending her to people like that.

MM haters are wild. I don't particularly care for Kate Middleton but I can admit that she's a beautiful woman who seems to be a good mom. I would never claim she's fat, ugly, her children aren't real, she bullied her husband into being with her, she's holding him at gunpoint, she's faked two pregnancies, she's a George Soros plant, or any number of other things I've seen MM haters claim.

[Anonymous]

MM's PR team has a bead on DCUM and they (if not HER) uses it to generate and control a certain online narrative. I've believed this for a long time.

When interest in her wains, or MM needs an ego boost, they shadow puppet as a third party defender. Or an anonymous "supporter."
To generate hits and to create an artificial
Groundswell of imaginary support for whatever it IS that she is doing.

This is why people hate her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MM's PR team has a bead on DCUM and they (if not HER) uses it to generate and control a certain online narrative. I've believed this for a long time.

When interest in her wains, or MM needs an ego boost, they shadow puppet as a third party defender. Or an anonymous "supporter."
To generate hits and to create an artificial
Groundswell of imaginary support for whatever it IS that she is doing.

This is why people hate her.

So, to recap. You think a celebrity's PR team is using a parenting forum in DC (when said celebrity lives across the country) to control the narrative? Not a national forum, not celebrity gossip outlets/media....but a parenting forum for Washingtonians?

Um. Okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are taking this waaaay too personally. Ever seen the Jen Hatmaker thread? It is at 870 pages!!! Perhaps your outrage should be directed there?

Relax about Meghan Markle and her thread. I promise you, she doesn't read the thread and wouldn't care. You are expending needless emotional energy on this.

I’m not the one spending my days reading Meghan hate subreddits and then rushing over to a mom’s website to regurgitate the bile….

You just described the whole Blake Lively thread.

Not that OP but I also think the anti-Lively posters take it too far and need to examine why they have such strong feelings about a celebrity. Both threads have terrible people in them, but the Markle ones always go way beyond.

A man's life has been ruined because of Blake Lively's accusations. Meghan Markle has done nothing wrong. I hate when white feminists group these two together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MM's PR team has a bead on DCUM and they (if not HER) uses it to generate and control a certain online narrative. I've believed this for a long time.

When interest in her wains, or MM needs an ego boost, they shadow puppet as a third party defender. Or an anonymous "supporter."
To generate hits and to create an artificial
Groundswell of imaginary support for whatever it IS that she is doing.

This is why people hate her.

So, to recap. You think a celebrity's PR team is using a parenting forum in DC (when said celebrity lives across the country) to control the narrative? Not a national forum, not celebrity gossip outlets/media....but a parenting forum for Washingtonians?

Um. Okay.

💯. It's so weird that pp keeps posting that any comments favorable to Meghan must be from her PR team. As if nobody with eyes saw what the BRF did to the Sussexes. Or understands the palace-royal rota collusion to trash the Sussexes in order to deflect from the remaining royals. (Here, scroll to the bottom for recent WhatsApp screenshots where Charles' comms guy threatened the rota with loss of access if they published something the palace didn't want published: https://www.thedailybeast.com/desperate-royals-tried-to-censor-leaked-kings-funeral-plans/?utm_medium=socialflow&via=twitter_page&utm_campaign=owned_social&utm_source=twitter_owned_tdb. Tom Sykes, who leaked the screenshots, was kicked out of the rota for this.)

Who wouldn't be sympathetic to Meghan after understanding this industrial-level smearing campaign against her? There are special Meghan hate subs on Reddit. They don't let anyone post positive things about her. The whole thing is disgusting. But as another pp says, it's not worth engaging with those people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are taking this waaaay too personally. Ever seen the Jen Hatmaker thread? It is at 870 pages!!! Perhaps your outrage should be directed there?

Relax about Meghan Markle and her thread. I promise you, she doesn't read the thread and wouldn't care. You are expending needless emotional energy on this.

I’m not the one spending my days reading Meghan hate subreddits and then rushing over to a mom’s website to regurgitate the bile….

You just described the whole Blake Lively thread.

Not that OP but I also think the anti-Lively posters take it too far and need to examine why they have such strong feelings about a celebrity. Both threads have terrible people in them, but the Markle ones always go way beyond.

A man's life has been ruined because of Blake Lively's accusations. Meghan Markle has done nothing wrong. I hate when white feminists group these two together.

Sure, we should never come forward with harassment and retaliation claims because the guy who did it will get his life ruined. /s

[Anonymous]

Look, we are allowed to think badly of her based on her behavior and choices. Influencers often draw bad press because they are attention-seeking and narcissistic. It goes with the territory. She doesn’t have to be in everyone’s face all the time, but she is.
You can’t control how people think or the opinions they form. It’s fruitless. She obviously can handle negative attention.