|
Good for Tulane for being direct and explaining why they are no longer taking students from a particular high school. It's very straightforward. And presumably the high school in question and the families that attend that school will no longer engage in such unethical behavior. That's much more fair and effective than the soft bans. A lot of competitive high schools suffer from soft bans due to unethical behavior by prior applicants. Your naviance data will tell you exactly which universities hate your school. Tulane is being straightforward, which is better all around. There are nearly 30,000 high schools in the US. The vast majority play by the rules. I don't think there's anything wrong with naming and shaming the high schools that engage in this kind of unethical behavior. These aren't permanent bans - just incentives to get their act together.
|
| There are independent college counselors actively advising kids not to pull EA applications if accepted ED. They specifically tell the families that your school college counselor will not be able to see whether you pull the apps. If you get into a better school in EA, claim you had a change in circumstances (divorce, loss of job, ill parent need to be closer to home) and pull out of ED. This is 100% happening. IYKYK |
So why not apply to the better school in ED? If you got in EA, you’d get in ED. Why apply ED to not your first choice? |
Why would college counselors send transcripts and other documents from the HS to any other college then the ED choice? |
I'm sure this is happening. ED comes out in December. You can apply to every EA and RA school by then. |
Oh, this will be allowed. The Service Academies do not offer ED or EA or SCEA. It's RD for everyone. Our DC went through the West Point application process - which a very long and demanding process. But also applied ED to a T20 private university. The ED admission came before the West Point decision. So DC followed the rules, and removed the West Point app, and attends the private university. However, there was an understanding that you can prioritize a Service Academy appointment over an ED acceptance. Absolutely no university is suing anyone for choosing West Point or Annapolis or the Air Force Academy. Especially if there is a change in financial circumstances - such as a divorce - which is very legitimate reason to defer from an ED commitment for any student. In the example above, nobody did anything wrong. |
| Bunch of boot lickers in this thread. Colleges take advantage of you all the time; might as well squeeze what you can out of them. |
When I get financial aid, I deserve it. When THEY get financial aid, it’s gaming the system. Imagine being such a sociopath that when a family member gets laid off, your first thought is “great, now they get a free ride on tuition.” |
Banning the school as a whole makes a lot more sense if the problem is the counselors, that means it’s an institutional problem with violating the ED agreement. |
AI says otherwise: Yes, a service academy will likely rescind an offer of admission if it discovers a student broke a binding Early Decision (ED) agreement with another college. This is considered a serious breach of ethics and integrity that service academies expect from candidates. |
What an inane take. “Colleges take advantage of you all the time” lol. |
Oh you’re a gem. |
I agree that it is unethical. The ED system is also unethical. |
UVA EA is the same deadline as other schools’ ED. So transcripts go to all. |
Because November 1 is also the EA deadline and it’s perfectly acceptable to apply ED to one schools and EA (or early rolling) to a bunch of others. Counselors sending transcripts to EA/rolling schools is the system working as intended. |