Or just get rid of super scoring. |
"A simple act of Congress." Are you in the DMV and writing that without sarcasm? That's amazing. |
|
ED is not going to help a merely good student get admitted to a very selective institution.
ED is exploitative and rewards universities who can persuade rich families to apply to their institution as a target, not a reach. The alternative is to create an academic meritocracy based on nationally-normed exams, which is what most countries do. In Europe and Canada and Latin America, it's going pretty well. In East Asia, they took it to extremes. Over decades, it led to the worst suicide risk in the word for Japanese teens, and the development of an entire industry of prep schools after normal school. In Korea, Kindergartners go to prep school after their regular school day. Legislation had to be passed so that prep schools would end at 11pm, because parents were being persuaded to enroll their kids in stuff that continued beyond that. There is no win-win in a society that prizes only the top outcomes above all else. It's the East Asian mindset that needs to change to accept a wide variety of educational experiences. I feel the USA and Europe are not in danger of going too far in that direction, because they do not have the demographic, economic and cultural pressures that Japan and Korea have. Please remember that it's only a small subset of US families that are willing participants in the race to the Ivies. Most families aren't thinking like this at all! - Japanese |
I agree with this as well. |
A “simple act of Congress” just taxed endowments, with huge budget implications. A “no ED requirement” is not an unfunded mandate; it costs nothing. As would limiting waitlists to — I don’t know — 1/4 the size of the previous years fall freshman class? |
At a couple of test prep centers in the DMV, on their walls are pennets of only ivy league schools. Should anyone coming in to test prep to help increase their ACT or SAT scores be targeting only Ivies? |
Wow. The biggest cheats at my kid’s schools are white. Both male and female. Kids who have no conscience and don’t think twice of copying someone’s answers, using a stolen test, or coordinating cheating schemes among friends. Just as counter point! |
+1000 |
If a kid is that awesome, they will do fine wherever they go to college. |
|
Greater transparency, i.e. what is the 50th/ 75th% SAT/ GPA of the non athlete admittees? What percent of the ED admits are legacy, what percent are recruited athletes how many are "dean's interest," i.e donors? It would be useful to know how many spots at the T20 privates are really "available" for unhooked applicants?
But in the end that info won't change that there are only a few spots. That scarcity is what makes this all so fraught and I don't see how any legislation can fix that |
The cheating is rampant at my kids’ Catholic schools. I was surprised by this; it was not the case at my Catholic school in the 90s. No idea what changed but even the top of the class cheats. It’s a bummer. |
This! Plenty of successful people didn’t graduate from top 100 schools, and plenty of others who graduated from top 10s are struggling. Life is what you make of it, whether you go to college or not. |
| This misery is self-imposed. If you have a high stats kid who seeks rigor (is not pushed by you) and you’re confident they won’t be stressed by playing the game, throw a hat in the ring. But even these kids should be mentally prepared for the fact admission is unlikely. They need to hear the message loud and clear that they are not defined by the name of the school they attend. Send the message early and often that your kids are loved not just for their achievements but because they are unique individuals who are kind, creative, hardworking, etc. Let them know you love them whether they end up at Harvard or community college. I have seen so many kids who struggle with the rejection. It feels like they’ve been set up for failure by parents and a community with unrealistic expectations, that sends the toxic message that the college they attend equates to their worth. |
The entire testing industry from students taking exams for GT identification, private school or magnet school admissions, or for college and grad school is such a racket. I wasn’t willing to invest the money, but many parents spends thousands of dollars prepping their kid. My kid took the ACT one time and spent a weekend looking over the practice exams provided. I wonder if schools knew he only took it once, but he was admitted to several top 20s. |
How would you know, Tiger Mom? |