Nah, I think I'll opt out of the 2 choices that are below grade level in MP1 so they have to do the at-grade level book for English 9. |
Just because it hasn't happened to your child, doesn't mean it doesn't happen at other schools. Talk to the teacher about what? If we want the textbooks or novels we buy them. I bought two textbooks so far this year. |
You want MCPS to....violate copyright by photocopying and distributing to thousands of people full books? Get the book out of the library or take the time. You opt out people really are entitled. |
|
The CKLA units and stories seem fine to me.
Some of the approved supplemental books and readings really are not particularly well chosen. Others seem ok. I am surprised by the number of subjects / units with no standard textbook. That seems like a recipe for a inconsistent instruction and an academic mess. |
| I cannot find any Shakespeare. Where is it and which books? |
They often read Romeo & Juliet and Julius Caesar. Probably not during the first marking period, which is all they've posted so far. |
100%. I don’t plan to put any time into creating alternative assignments. I’m sure AI can plan independent work to accompany some Kipling or Little House on the Prairie. I feel bad for the kids who are stuck with these parents, but I can only do so much. |
I will bet this will be litigated as well and then MCPS will create a standard that the lessons for the alternative need to be as robust as those for the opted-out title. That will require central office to create a plan for multiple books or to just get rid of the controversial books. |
where do the kids go for their alternative work? |
Most libraries only have 1 copy, and 30-35 students in a classroom. No, I expect them to buy books for ever class for every child. |
No, they don't read that, they get movies. Or, that's what happens at our school. |
The goal of the groups is for no one to read the controversial books. |
+1 Also, they are defining "controversial" in the Trumpian sense, meaning absolutely no discussion of slavery, inequality/privilege of any kind, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity, that otherwise paints US History as "racist, sexist, or otherwise discriminatory." All readings much be laudatory and "patriotic." The problem is that no book is ever going to fit the bill. Grapes of Wrath involves systemic inequality (and has nudity and other verboten topics.). Catch-22 satirizes the US military. Huck Finn humanizes enslaved people and discusses systemic inequality. The ultimate goal, I think, is not to read at all. |
That’s a different thing than parents demanding to have the books “emailed” to them in advance of the material. Put the work in and stop being so precious. |
I’m amused by the thought of the opt out people having to read kids chapter books to know whether to get offended. |