Too much like a wedding dress?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, it looks like a nightgown on all the review photos. I think a similar eyelet dress but with some darts in the front and maybe vertically on the back would be flattering, and still comfortable.

I am baffled by the modern trend of calling shapeless sacks dresses. I know it's easier and cheaper for the manufacturers, but why do women buy this stuff?

I love dresses like this, it’s all I wear - but I have a natural figure and don’t need to hide or accentuate anything

What does this mean? I’m a petite person and look like I was swallowed by fabric when I try to wear things like this. These dresses are just not attractive for a huge segment of the population.

Baffled by this trend PP here - I'm petite too. I'm reasonably thin, very tiny up top, and have normal sized hips (so pear shaped but not exactly curvy if that makes sense). I have a proportionately tiny torso even for my height and narrow shoulders.

I don't think there's a single body shape I've seen that look better in the shapeless dresses than they would in something appropriately fitted and designed for their shape. I have seen people who look fine in the straight/flaring out sacks, but well fitting is always better.

[Anonymous]

Stop listening to your DH's fashion advice. Full stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, it looks like a nightgown on all the review photos. I think a similar eyelet dress but with some darts in the front and maybe vertically on the back would be flattering, and still comfortable.

I am baffled by the modern trend of calling shapeless sacks dresses. I know it's easier and cheaper for the manufacturers, but why do women buy this stuff?

Because it doesn't look like a sack on them because they aren't frumpy and obese like you?