Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't think they need them. Mine uses it for Itrace and zearn. Maybe Zearn, but Itrace should be replaced with actual writing practice.
Why TF do kids need to do zearn anyway? Put it on paper! Then the information will actually stick! It's lazy, stupid, and the result of some schmo who is friends with a higher up at the public school system who managed to sell them on their stupid ineffective software.
Because it is easier to stick kids in front of computers than to provide actual instruction from a human being. And yep, "Edtech" is a huge business...follow the money. Always.
Yep and this is also a natural and necessary consequence of continually increasing class sizes and no differentiation. Teachers are struggling and this is an easy shortcut.
+1
I’m not a fan of screens in elementary school in the younger grades but understand why iPads and Chromebooks are used. My kids don’t use or own tablets at home. My kids’ teachers use Lexia and ST Math as a small group rotation so they can have time for some differentiation. Class sizes are too big.
Because tracking is no longer in practice, the skill levels in one class are too extreme.
What does this mean?
Kids of all ability levels are in one class. You might have ten kids reading on level, five kids severely above, and five way ahead who are bored to tears. iPad time lets teachers pull kids in small groups so they can all get some instruction at their level.
Wasn’t this always the case? Kids of lots of levels in one class? I remember attending public and the only thing that was different was that a classmate and I got harder spelling words.
Putting kids in different groups based on ability happens in middle school or maybe 5th grade.
Nope, I definitely recall my elementary school tracked from first grade. They were very open about it, we all knew which class was the "best" class, which class had what we probably called "the stupid kids" but looking back was kids struggling with LDs diagnosed or not, and which classes were the middle ones.
Even in college (and I can't for the life of me remember why this came up in a sociology class), I remember a professor saying "and I know you elementary education major are being taught how to track students."
Not tracking is a fairly new thing. Varied ability classrooms are recent, and I don't know how teachers are expected to meet the needs of every child when there is such a wide spread. My child's second grade classroom has kids who are way above grade level and kids who still can't read or do basic addition. I feel for these teachers, we're demanding they perform superhuman work with less than zero support. And it ultimately hurts all the kids.