Just because a book has HL attached to its Lexile, doesn’t mean it can or should only be read by struggling reading. It just means it will be appropriate for struggling readers. The content of the book can and likely is of interest and appeal to a particular audience which in this case is Middle School. And it can be used to illustrate both visually and in language a particular theme or idea that is being explored in the English class. Should it be paired with other texts? yes. Should additional work be given? Yes. But again, it being a graphic novel doesn’t make it not worthy of the class. Further, the PP didn’t specify a particular graphic novel, they made a generalization that because a graphic novel was included in the curriculum it couldn’t be on grade level. That generalization is wrong as there are lots of graphic novels that cover an array of topics and themes that are perfectly in grade level. That generalization would be like saying because a story is delivered in film format it can’t possibly have as much value as a book. |
If they can’t do the work in the previous level class, they shouldn’t be allowed in the next level up. Otherwise the next level up is dumbed down to accommodate those kids. |
| Do they expect students to read the texts at home online for homework? |
Google reading print vs. on screens |
You may enjoy both graphic novels and films, but these are not media that will develop the difficult human skills of reading comprehension, synthesis of written sources and writing. Those are the focus of English class, not just "telling a story." - English teacher |
| I just think they should read twice as many books as they do. Most of these books are super short and I know they are supposed to be just “anchor” texts but in reality the teachers are assigning one chapter per week to stretch the book out over the whole quarter. My kid was doing badly on the quizzes because he had read the book a month prior when it was assigned. |
You have made my point. This is a book appropriate for middle school and for struggling readers. It is not appropriate as the anchor text for an honors high school English class. |
I found this on the Churchill site. It's from 17-18 so a bit out of date but it does explain the difference between honors and grade level. The difference seems to be pacing and the amount of scaffolding required. https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/siteassets/schools/high-schools/r-w/churchillhs/uploadedfiles/departments/english/faqs20for209th20grade20english20on20level20and20honors2020171.pdf |
There is now no difference. Central office provides no requirements/guidance for what the honors class needs to have. |
Interesting. So if I gave someone a graphic novel and the images didn’t convey the text it wouldn’t be confusing? When we read we never create images in our minds of what is happening? Editorial cartoons or Political cartoons don’t require comprehension of the image, text, and potentially understanding of the time/environment of which they are written? Comprehension and synthesis is absent? There’s no possibility of comparing and contrasting the message and intent of a text with that of an image? Films aren’t visual interpretation of a text? |
Yes, they are a visual interpretation of a text, but we have a crisis where kids do not and cannot read actual text. Those are the priority. A one day video in order to compare it to a scene in Shakespeare? Yes. Graphic novels where kids can discern the story through pictures like a 1st grader? Umm... no. |
Unfortunately, that's no longer applicable. Starting last year, all MCPS high schools offer only honors for 9th and 10th graders. The only differentiation is whether it is honors English 9 ESL or honors English 9 for kids who are not in ESL. So, there is no differentiation anymore. There is also no tracking, so maybe your highly motivated 9th grader ends up with other highly motivated 9th graders. Or maybe they end up in a class full of kids who have never read a book and don't want to. I have to note that this is wildly unpopular with teachers themselves. They don't want to teach a single class that tries to meet the needs of such a wildly disparate group of kids. It's not even popular with administration, who keeps apologizing to parents for what they are being forced to put up with. This is a decision that came down from the central office, which was fought by the schools, and that Taylor could undo in a matter of weeks. It would be too late for this year's 9th and 10th graders, but the curriculum for a real honors English class exists and schools certainly have the ability to track kids into honors versus on level. All they need is the permission. |
Precisely. What is honors about it if everyone is in it? and I'm a parent who would very happy for my DD to be in non-honors since she has LD and but our school doesn't offer non-honors anything (except math). |
Looks like Northwood offers both on-level and honors for English 9, 10, and 11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1khF7F9cwOVyT7TkW-PQdg7KjL4PzF4cZ5lVPsEiTtCA/edit |
Yes, schools still list on-level but they don't actually offer it. Try to find a NHS kid in on-level English. |