Why is Dakota Johnson wasting her time with Chris Martin?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has been dating Chris Martin for years now and is in her mid thirties while he is pushing 50. He already has 2 kids is divorced. Why is she wasting her fertility on this old guy who already has kids?

I also find it strange how many beautiful wealthy actresses there are wasting what’s left of their fertility away. Dakota is rich, dating an even richer man, plenty old enough, and both have a lot of leisure time — why would she not be trying to have kids? It makes no sense. But she’s hardly alone in Hollywood. Childless actresses off the top of my head whose fertility window is closing or closed:

Brie Larson, Sofia Vergara, Margot Robbie (lies about her age), Aubrey Plaza, Emma Watson, all of the Olson sisters… on and on.

Sofia Vergara has an adult son from her first marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He split with her when she wouldn't marry him and have kids. then they got back together

not everyone has dreams of being a suburban housewife

Not everyone has dreams of marrying an old divorced guy.

He’s a genius rock star in the biggest band of the last 50 years? Handsome for his age. Filthy rich. And they’ve been shagging for years, so clearly the old divorced guy thing doesn’t bother her. Not having a baby or two by now is senseless.

Genius rock star?!
Biggest band last 50 years?!

We're drinking the hard stuff a wee bit early today aren't we?

[Anonymous]

I really find OPs obsession with youth and fertility disturbing. Focus on popping out your own babies and everyone else will focus on themselves - cool?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has been dating Chris Martin for years now and is in her mid thirties while he is pushing 50. He already has 2 kids is divorced. Why is she wasting her fertility on this old guy who already has kids?

Not everyone dreams of being a suburban cul-de-sac mommy. There is a big world out there OP.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has been dating Chris Martin for years now and is in her mid thirties while he is pushing 50. He already has 2 kids is divorced. Why is she wasting her fertility on this old guy who already has kids?

I also find it strange how many beautiful wealthy actresses there are wasting what’s left of their fertility away. Dakota is rich, dating an even richer man, plenty old enough, and both have a lot of leisure time — why would she not be trying to have kids? It makes no sense. But she’s hardly alone in Hollywood. Childless actresses off the top of my head whose fertility window is closing or closed:

Brie Larson, Sofia Vergara, Margot Robbie (lies about her age), Aubrey Plaza, Emma Watson, all of the Olson sisters… on and on.

Are you listening? Not everyone wants kids. Worry about your own fertility

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He split with her when she wouldn't marry him and have kids. then they got back together

not everyone has dreams of being a suburban housewife

Not everyone has dreams of marrying an old divorced guy.

He’s a genius rock star in the biggest band of the last 50 years? Handsome for his age. Filthy rich. And they’ve been shagging for years, so clearly the old divorced guy thing doesn’t bother her. Not having a baby or two by now is senseless.

Genius rock star?!
Biggest band last 50 years?!

We're drinking the hard stuff a wee bit early today aren't we?

I mean, Coldplay is objectively one of the most commercially successful bands of the last 30 years. They were a hit machine. "Biggest band of the last 50 years" might be an overstatement, but it's in the ballpark.

Also he's not THAT much older than her. He's 46 and she's 33. It's not like he could be her dad or something.

[Anonymous]

Maybe she really likes him. In interviews, she comes across as quite genuine.

Or maybe she likes Chris Martin because he has an estimated worth of $160 million. Yes, that is not a typo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has been dating Chris Martin for years now and is in her mid thirties while he is pushing 50. He already has 2 kids is divorced. Why is she wasting her fertility on this old guy who already has kids?

I also find it strange how many beautiful wealthy actresses there are wasting what’s left of their fertility away. Dakota is rich, dating an even richer man, plenty old enough, and both have a lot of leisure time — why would she not be trying to have kids? It makes no sense. But she’s hardly alone in Hollywood. Childless actresses off the top of my head whose fertility window is closing or closed:

Brie Larson, Sofia Vergara, Margot Robbie (lies about her age), Aubrey Plaza, Emma Watson, all of the Olson sisters… on and on.

Why is their attractiveness or celebrity a factor at all? They should procreate because they are beautiful?

Um, yes? Dire and sad when hideous people outbreed pretty people.

I hate to tell you, but fertility clinics are crawling with beautiful women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He split with her when she wouldn't marry him and have kids. then they got back together

not everyone has dreams of being a suburban housewife

Not everyone has dreams of marrying an old divorced guy.

He’s a genius rock star in the biggest band of the last 50 years? Handsome for his age. Filthy rich. And they’ve been shagging for years, so clearly the old divorced guy thing doesn’t bother her. Not having a baby or two by now is senseless.

Genius rock star?!
Biggest band last 50 years?!

We're drinking the hard stuff a wee bit early today aren't we?

He is a genius, yes. 50 years was maybe a stretch, more like 30 years. Over 100 million albums sold, but I bet his songs make more than almost any modern band off residuals and royalties from commercial ads, TV shows and movies. It doesn’t get bigger than Chris Martin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has been dating Chris Martin for years now and is in her mid thirties while he is pushing 50. He already has 2 kids is divorced. Why is she wasting her fertility on this old guy who already has kids?

I also find it strange how many beautiful wealthy actresses there are wasting what’s left of their fertility away. Dakota is rich, dating an even richer man, plenty old enough, and both have a lot of leisure time — why would she not be trying to have kids? It makes no sense. But she’s hardly alone in Hollywood. Childless actresses off the top of my head whose fertility window is closing or closed:

Brie Larson, Sofia Vergara, Margot Robbie (lies about her age), Aubrey Plaza, Emma Watson, all of the Olson sisters… on and on.

Why is their attractiveness or celebrity a factor at all? They should procreate because they are beautiful?

Um, yes? Dire and sad when hideous people outbreed pretty people.

I hate to tell you, but fertility clinics are crawling with beautiful women.

Yes, which is sad. They should have been making babies 10 or 15 years earlier. Naturally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she really likes him. In interviews, she comes across as quite genuine.

Or maybe she likes Chris Martin because he has an estimated worth of $160 million. Yes, that is not a typo.

idk who owns the Coldplay catalog but it’s gotta be worth a billion plus dollars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has been dating Chris Martin for years now and is in her mid thirties while he is pushing 50. He already has 2 kids is divorced. Why is she wasting her fertility on this old guy who already has kids?

I also find it strange how many beautiful wealthy actresses there are wasting what’s left of their fertility away. Dakota is rich, dating an even richer man, plenty old enough, and both have a lot of leisure time — why would she not be trying to have kids? It makes no sense. But she’s hardly alone in Hollywood. Childless actresses off the top of my head whose fertility window is closing or closed:

Brie Larson, Sofia Vergara, Margot Robbie (lies about her age), Aubrey Plaza, Emma Watson, all of the Olson sisters… on and on.

Why is their attractiveness or celebrity a factor at all? They should procreate because they are beautiful?

Um, yes? Dire and sad when hideous people outbreed pretty people.

I hate to tell you, but fertility clinics are crawling with beautiful women.

Yes, which is sad. They should have been making babies 10 or 15 years earlier. Naturally.

They should do whatever TF they want to do with their bodies. Sit down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she really likes him. In interviews, she comes across as quite genuine.

Or maybe she likes Chris Martin because he has an estimated worth of $160 million. Yes, that is not a typo.

idk who owns the Coldplay catalog but it’s gotta be worth a billion plus dollars.

I was trying to figure out if PP was saying that $160 million was a lot - or a little bit - of money.

[Anonymous]

Perhaps she really likes the BTS Wootteo plushie that he takes to every show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has been dating Chris Martin for years now and is in her mid thirties while he is pushing 50. He already has 2 kids is divorced. Why is she wasting her fertility on this old guy who already has kids?

I also find it strange how many beautiful wealthy actresses there are wasting what’s left of their fertility away. Dakota is rich, dating an even richer man, plenty old enough, and both have a lot of leisure time — why would she not be trying to have kids? It makes no sense. But she’s hardly alone in Hollywood. Childless actresses off the top of my head whose fertility window is closing or closed:

Brie Larson, Sofia Vergara, Margot Robbie (lies about her age), Aubrey Plaza, Emma Watson, all of the Olson sisters… on and on.

Makes perfect sense to me why the Olsen sisters don’t have kids. They seem deeply impacted by the way they grew up. I get the feeling they’ve never been in a place where they didn’t feel ambiguous about the stability of their lives and how they could raise a child whose childhood wasn’t messed up like theirs.

There is one relentless poster on this thread and others who gets angry when people speculate why mid-late thirties female actresses don’t seem to be pursuing parenthood. The answer is because celebrity or not, women don’t have forever to make the decision like a man does, which said poster does not seem to understand. It’s fine if someone doesn’t want to have kids, but it’s a fair question to ask about women of a certain age who need to at least preserve their fertility - ideally with a partner- even if they do want kids down the road. Said poster also makes it seem like it’s impossible for an established, thirty something woman to maintain her Hollywood career while having kids, which is just so inaccurate- see Reese Witherspoon, cate blanchett, Kate winslet, Nicole Kidman, and countless others.