Let's talk about the debate

[Anonymous]

Lindsey Graham lumps Cruz, Trump, and Sanders together as the three worst choices for President.

Of Sanders, Graham estimated that “we’ve never had a more liberal person running for president.” Trump is “the most unprepared person I’ve ever met to be commander in chief,” he said, while Cruz’s Senate tenure “makes it impossible for me to believe that he could bring this country together.” In short, he’s not excited by the prospect of either Trump, Cruz or Sanders being elected president. “If the past is any indication of the future in terms of these three people, I think America would be in trouble,” Graham said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/01/21/trump-or-cruz-graham-says-both-would-kill-the-gop/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lindsey Graham lumps Cruz, Trump, and Sanders together as the three worst choices for President.

Of Sanders, Graham estimated that “we’ve never had a more liberal person running for president.” Trump is “the most unprepared person I’ve ever met to be commander in chief,” he said, while Cruz’s Senate tenure “makes it impossible for me to believe that he could bring this country together.” In short, he’s not excited by the prospect of either Trump, Cruz or Sanders being elected president. “If the past is any indication of the future in terms of these three people, I think America would be in trouble,” Graham said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/01/21/trump-or-cruz-graham-says-both-would-kill-the-gop/

Given Lindsay Graham's record, I would not take anything he says seriously ........ and obviously even within his own state his support was negligible when he sought the nomination. So Republicans in SC did not think much of him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The latest CNN/ORC poll just released for Iowa shows Sanders leading 51% to 43% over Clinton.

Democrats, thank goodness, are realizing that Clinton is a fraud.

The polling is interesting in Iowa. Opposition to her there is driven by white men - the Berniebros. I read a fairly upsetting article on it.

Do you have a link for this assertion?

What I have read is that younger women support Sanders by a large margin. Older women support Clinton.

If you look at those who attend Sanders rallies a lot of the men and women are relatively young.

I went to a Clinton book signing a couple of summers ago - it was mostly old white women. Very few young women - and the book signing was next to a massive college campus that enrolls 40k+ students, in a city that is relatively young.

Young women are turned off by HRC.

[Anonymous]

After steadfastly refusing to hold more debates, DWS has obviously had a change of heart now that Hillary's numbers are sliding.

A last minute debate has been scheduled with CNN except that they are calling it a town hall meeting - as if that fools anyone - during prime time unlike the previous debates when the viewership would be lower.

Hilarious to see the DNC panicking to try and salvage Iowa for Hillary! Ah, well - the best laid plans can go wrong!!

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/01/hillary-clinton-debate-iowa-sanders

[Anonymous]

Hillary's vaunted support among Hispanics may not be that solid, after all!

http://www.rgj.com/story/news/politics/2016/01/20/three-spanish-language-publications-endorse-sanders/79075958/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hillary's vaunted support among Hispanics may not be that solid, after all!

http://www.rgj.com/story/news/politics/2016/01/20/three-spanish-language-publications-endorse-sanders/79075958/

LOL. You don't follow Ralston, do you? If you did, you would know the backstory here.