How much did you sleep around in college?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


Why are you so angry ? Men who screw around are doing it with women who screw around. They are free to do whatever they want. That doesn’t mean that women who engage in this sexual behaviors are typical, or if that’s safe and joyful experiences for them. Likely not.
Also saying female libido if the same as male is pure ignorance. How often do you wake up aroused with morning wood? Men do every day since age 14. And they’ll find a relief themselves or with loose women. Most women wouldn’t even think about sex relief in the morning.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


Why are you so angry ? Men who screw around are doing it with women who screw around. They are free to do whatever they want. That doesn’t mean that women who engage in this sexual behaviors are typical, or if that’s safe and joyful experiences for them. Likely not.
Also saying female libido if the same as male is pure ignorance. How often do you wake up aroused with morning wood? Men do every day since age 14. And they’ll find a relief themselves or with loose women. Most women wouldn’t even think about sex relief in the morning.


I’m so done with your ignorance. You just came back with more horseshit that men need to screw and women who do are loose. Morning wood has nothing to with arousal by the way. You know as much about men’s biology as you do about women’s. You’re just too ignorant and I refuse to engage with you any further. You’re an embarrassment to all women.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


Why are you so angry ? Men who screw around are doing it with women who screw around. They are free to do whatever they want. That doesn’t mean that women who engage in this sexual behaviors are typical, or if that’s safe and joyful experiences for them. Likely not.
Also saying female libido if the same as male is pure ignorance. How often do you wake up aroused with morning wood? Men do every day since age 14. And they’ll find a relief themselves or with loose women. Most women wouldn’t even think about sex relief in the morning.


I’m so done with your ignorance. You just came back with more horseshit that men need to screw and women who do are loose. Morning wood has nothing to with arousal by the way. You know as much about men’s biology as you do about women’s. You’re just too ignorant and I refuse to engage with you any further. You’re an embarrassment to all women.


You should be ashamed of your highly immoral pseudo feminist posts . Didn’t respond to any of the links posted on difference between men and women which are real. Women are also at much higher risk of catching STDs even with protection. There is a pandemic of HPV, herpes and throat STDs . These are just the facts and I don’t know how any “liberated” sexually woman is going to sleep with over 70 men and still be safe to herself and others
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


Why are you so angry ? Men who screw around are doing it with women who screw around. They are free to do whatever they want. That doesn’t mean that women who engage in this sexual behaviors are typical, or if that’s safe and joyful experiences for them. Likely not.
Also saying female libido if the same as male is pure ignorance. How often do you wake up aroused with morning wood? Men do every day since age 14. And they’ll find a relief themselves or with loose women. Most women wouldn’t even think about sex relief in the morning.


I’m so done with your ignorance. You just came back with more horseshit that men need to screw and women who do are loose. Morning wood has nothing to with arousal by the way. You know as much about men’s biology as you do about women’s. You’re just too ignorant and I refuse to engage with you any further. You’re an embarrassment to all women.


You should be ashamed of your highly immoral pseudo feminist posts . Didn’t respond to any of the links posted on difference between men and women which are real. Women are also at much higher risk of catching STDs even with protection. There is a pandemic of HPV, herpes and throat STDs . These are just the facts and I don’t know how any “liberated” sexually woman is going to sleep with over 70 men and still be safe to herself and others


You should be ashamed of how stupid you are. No one buying your double standard science. Go away frigid grandma.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


NP here.
Your ignorance is unbelievable. Perhaps your feminist beliefs are clouding your judgment. Men and women are fundamentally different and always will be.

Women face far greater consequences if they screw around compared to men.
A girl realizes early on that an unplanned pregnancy can completely change her life. The boy can just walk away from it. She cannot.

Screwing around poses more risks for women, and they have learned to steer clear of it.

If you are telling your daughters that it's acceptable to screw around, you are a monster.
Anonymous
Man, this thread could’ve been so cool…a bunch of middle aged women’s talking about screwing in college. Instead it got hijacked, oh well.
Anonymous
Not enough.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


NP here.
Your ignorance is unbelievable. Perhaps your feminist beliefs are clouding your judgment. Men and women are fundamentally different and always will be.

Women face far greater consequences if they screw around compared to men.
A girl realizes early on that an unplanned pregnancy can completely change her life. The boy can just walk away from it. She cannot.

Screwing around poses more risks for women, and they have learned to steer clear of it.

If you are telling your daughters that it's acceptable to screw around, you are a monster.


Sure. Most of it is stigma that assh0les like you keep perpetuating. You excuse men screwing around with your made up science about morning wood and hormones, but women apparently have no hormones or sexual desires of their own.

This whole thing got started when posters, as predicted, kept calling women who have had many partners whores and gross.

If you want to talk about STDs talk about it for both men and women. If you want to talk about men not taking responsibly for pregnancies they create, I’m willing to have that conversation. What I refuse to do is perpetuate the nonsense that women are not sexual beings, call them whores, loose, gross because we DARE behave in the same way that men do.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


Most people are not screwing around in college and their 20s with tons of different people as much as you keep falsely claiming. It’s a small subculture of loose women and feral males.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


Why are you so angry ? Men who screw around are doing it with women who screw around. They are free to do whatever they want. That doesn’t mean that women who engage in this sexual behaviors are typical, or if that’s safe and joyful experiences for them. Likely not.
Also saying female libido if the same as male is pure ignorance. How often do you wake up aroused with morning wood? Men do every day since age 14. And they’ll find a relief themselves or with loose women. Most women wouldn’t even think about sex relief in the morning.


I’m so done with your ignorance. You just came back with more horseshit that men need to screw and women who do are loose. Morning wood has nothing to with arousal by the way. You know as much about men’s biology as you do about women’s. You’re just too ignorant and I refuse to engage with you any further. You’re an embarrassment to all women.


lol

Holy moly u r dense.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Man, this thread could’ve been so cool…a bunch of middle aged women’s talking about screwing in college. Instead it got hijacked, oh well.


It’s all one Troll playing both sides every 30 mins. Lame.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Man, this thread could’ve been so cool…a bunch of middle aged women’s talking about screwing in college. Instead it got hijacked, oh well.


It’s all one Troll playing both sides every 30 mins. Lame.


If that’s what you need to tell yourself. I’m very much a woman talking to both men and women.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.


It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.


So I don’t sleep with you.


Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.


By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.


I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?


I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”


To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.


No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values


agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.


What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life


Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.


But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex


Please post a study that confirms this horseshit than men have sold you and you bought.


You are the one writing BS here encouraging women to engage in behaviors not natural and even potentially dangerous to their sexual and mental health.
The male libido is stronger due to testosterone

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552705/




You are one of the dumbest and most dishonest people I have ever encountered on here. You are spreading this idiocy that there is some kind of a differnt standard for men because of tostesterone. Men can screw around because they can’t possibly control themselves, but if a woman has the same urges she is a whore. How ignorant!!! If it’s ok for men to screw around the same is true for women. Women don’t need a reason or special permission to be sexual and to enjoy sex. You are the one setting women behind with this ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.


NP here.
Your ignorance is unbelievable. Perhaps your feminist beliefs are clouding your judgment. Men and women are fundamentally different and always will be.

Women face far greater consequences if they screw around compared to men.
A girl realizes early on that an unplanned pregnancy can completely change her life. The boy can just walk away from it. She cannot.

Screwing around poses more risks for women, and they have learned to steer clear of it.

If you are telling your daughters that it's acceptable to screw around, you are a monster.


Sure. Most of it is stigma that assh0les like you keep perpetuating. You excuse men screwing around with your made up science about morning wood and hormones, but women apparently have no hormones or sexual desires of their own.

This whole thing got started when posters, as predicted, kept calling women who have had many partners whores and gross.

If you want to talk about STDs talk about it for both men and women. If you want to talk about men not taking responsibly for pregnancies they create, I’m willing to have that conversation. What I refuse to do is perpetuate the nonsense that women are not sexual beings, call them whores, loose, gross because we DARE behave in the same way that men do.


Most men don’t behave that way either. I have a son in college so know firsthand. There is no double standard: I consider men who sleep around deviant and lacking self control. They are walking STD banks for me, to be avoided. I don’t know who are these women on this board who were split roasted in college. I suppose a lot of “subculture” people from SES very different of mine or US averages are posting here.
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: