40,000 on Zoom Call

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know someone who was on this call. They said it was weird.

Like they were celebrating as if she had already won the Presidency.

I think they are celebrating that:

1. Biden stepped down and now we have an alternative
2. a women of color may become the next POTUS

They will pander to Black Americans instead of talking about her being half Indian. Yeah, she's better than Biden, but she has zero charisma, is a lightweight, and has poor communication skills.

I was just on a zoom call last night for Asian American women for Harris. The zoom call got maxed out so they started streaming it to YouTube. I learned that she has been a long-time supporter and organizer/member of organizations for Indian Americans during her career. The energy on the call last night was electric. Every speaker, about half of whom have worked with her for a long time in various capacities, emphasized both her Black and Indian heritage. And of course, donations continued to pour in during the call.

So much for your assumptions.

Not sure why you would waste your time on a political zoom call, but your call has nothing to do with how the media portrays her. It was the same thing with Obama. They are pandering to simpletons in order to get votes.

Why wouldn't I want to join a call to learn how my demographic is helping promote the candidate that I'm most interested voting in? It wasn't a waste of time for me or my friends who logged on. These "simpletons" are a highly accomplished, highly educated segment of society. I'm just pointing out that Harris' campaign is NOT just pandering to Black Americans, and that she has a long history of honoring both aspects of her heritage. In terms of the rest of your crazy comment, well I guess the election in the end will tell us what worked and what didn't.

Ignore Ms. “Pandering Simpleton.” She’s upset that Kamala Harris excites multiple different groups in the electorate. Black Americans, Indian Americans, college educated Americans (and the people who value that but couldn’t get there), empathetic Americans.

NP. To me, it's weird to primarily identify as a "demographic". And it's doubly weird with certain demographics, it's essential to identify as your demographic, but with others, it's a threat to democracy to identify as your demographic. So it's okay to have a group called "black women for Harris" but "white men for Trump" would be a hate group. It doesn't make sense.

Perhaps you should learn a little US history if that doesn’t make sense to you. There is a group for white, Christian men that advocates for their demographic being favored. That group isn’t explicitly “for Trump,” but he is the chosen candidate for most of them. They are a hate group and considered domestic terrorists due to their tactics, such as lynching, cross burning and fire bombing churches. No one wants to start a “white men for Trump” group for fear of being associated with the organization I just described. Meanwhile, “Black women for Harris” is basically a politically active sorority that will GOTV and raise money. A group called “Middle class men for Trump” would be fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know someone who was on this call. They said it was weird.

Like they were celebrating as if she had already won the Presidency.

I think they are celebrating that:

1. Biden stepped down and now we have an alternative
2. a women of color may become the next POTUS

They will pander to Black Americans instead of talking about her being half Indian. Yeah, she's better than Biden, but she has zero charisma, is a lightweight, and has poor communication skills.

I was just on a zoom call last night for Asian American women for Harris. The zoom call got maxed out so they started streaming it to YouTube. I learned that she has been a long-time supporter and organizer/member of organizations for Indian Americans during her career. The energy on the call last night was electric. Every speaker, about half of whom have worked with her for a long time in various capacities, emphasized both her Black and Indian heritage. And of course, donations continued to pour in during the call.

So much for your assumptions.

Not sure why you would waste your time on a political zoom call, but your call has nothing to do with how the media portrays her. It was the same thing with Obama. They are pandering to simpletons in order to get votes.

Why wouldn't I want to join a call to learn how my demographic is helping promote the candidate that I'm most interested voting in? It wasn't a waste of time for me or my friends who logged on. These "simpletons" are a highly accomplished, highly educated segment of society. I'm just pointing out that Harris' campaign is NOT just pandering to Black Americans, and that she has a long history of honoring both aspects of her heritage. In terms of the rest of your crazy comment, well I guess the election in the end will tell us what worked and what didn't.

Ignore Ms. “Pandering Simpleton.” She’s upset that Kamala Harris excites multiple different groups in the electorate. Black Americans, Indian Americans, college educated Americans (and the people who value that but couldn’t get there), empathetic Americans.

NP. To me, it's weird to primarily identify as a "demographic". And it's doubly weird with certain demographics, it's essential to identify as your demographic, but with others, it's a threat to democracy to identify as your demographic. So it's okay to have a group called "black women for Harris" but "white men for Trump" would be a hate group. It doesn't make sense.

Because you are deliberately ignorant.

[Anonymous]

I’m on a zoom supporting Harris tonight (Thurs. 7/25) at 8:30PM. It’s entitled “Answer The Call” and may already be at max, but keep trying to register if you’re interested. https://www.answerthecall2024.com/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0QeuUXj2Pr65sAsB23qXroveXC93hOwmS-hziRdnVxvu6yipoNosV1q4I_aem_2yVmUiy4D567LhBKM27KPA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know someone who was on this call. They said it was weird.

Like they were celebrating as if she had already won the Presidency.

I think they are celebrating that:

1. Biden stepped down and now we have an alternative
2. a women of color may become the next POTUS

They will pander to Black Americans instead of talking about her being half Indian. Yeah, she's better than Biden, but she has zero charisma, is a lightweight, and has poor communication skills.

I was just on a zoom call last night for Asian American women for Harris. The zoom call got maxed out so they started streaming it to YouTube. I learned that she has been a long-time supporter and organizer/member of organizations for Indian Americans during her career. The energy on the call last night was electric. Every speaker, about half of whom have worked with her for a long time in various capacities, emphasized both her Black and Indian heritage. And of course, donations continued to pour in during the call.

So much for your assumptions.

Not sure why you would waste your time on a political zoom call, but your call has nothing to do with how the media portrays her. It was the same thing with Obama. They are pandering to simpletons in order to get votes.

Why wouldn't I want to join a call to learn how my demographic is helping promote the candidate that I'm most interested voting in? It wasn't a waste of time for me or my friends who logged on. These "simpletons" are a highly accomplished, highly educated segment of society. I'm just pointing out that Harris' campaign is NOT just pandering to Black Americans, and that she has a long history of honoring both aspects of her heritage. In terms of the rest of your crazy comment, well I guess the election in the end will tell us what worked and what didn't.

Ignore Ms. “Pandering Simpleton.” She’s upset that Kamala Harris excites multiple different groups in the electorate. Black Americans, Indian Americans, college educated Americans (and the people who value that but couldn’t get there), empathetic Americans.

NP. To me, it's weird to primarily identify as a "demographic". And it's doubly weird with certain demographics, it's essential to identify as your demographic, but with others, it's a threat to democracy to identify as your demographic. So it's okay to have a group called "black women for Harris" but "white men for Trump" would be a hate group. It doesn't make sense.

It sounds like you just want to whine about minorities but ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know someone who was on this call. They said it was weird.

Like they were celebrating as if she had already won the Presidency.

I think they are celebrating that:

1. Biden stepped down and now we have an alternative
2. a women of color may become the next POTUS

They will pander to Black Americans instead of talking about her being half Indian. Yeah, she's better than Biden, but she has zero charisma, is a lightweight, and has poor communication skills.

I was just on a zoom call last night for Asian American women for Harris. The zoom call got maxed out so they started streaming it to YouTube. I learned that she has been a long-time supporter and organizer/member of organizations for Indian Americans during her career. The energy on the call last night was electric. Every speaker, about half of whom have worked with her for a long time in various capacities, emphasized both her Black and Indian heritage. And of course, donations continued to pour in during the call.

So much for your assumptions.

Not sure why you would waste your time on a political zoom call, but your call has nothing to do with how the media portrays her. It was the same thing with Obama. They are pandering to simpletons in order to get votes.

Why wouldn't I want to join a call to learn how my demographic is helping promote the candidate that I'm most interested voting in? It wasn't a waste of time for me or my friends who logged on. These "simpletons" are a highly accomplished, highly educated segment of society. I'm just pointing out that Harris' campaign is NOT just pandering to Black Americans, and that she has a long history of honoring both aspects of her heritage. In terms of the rest of your crazy comment, well I guess the election in the end will tell us what worked and what didn't.

Ignore Ms. “Pandering Simpleton.” She’s upset that Kamala Harris excites multiple different groups in the electorate. Black Americans, Indian Americans, college educated Americans (and the people who value that but couldn’t get there), empathetic Americans.

NP. To me, it's weird to primarily identify as a "demographic". And it's doubly weird with certain demographics, it's essential to identify as your demographic, but with others, it's a threat to democracy to identify as your demographic. So it's okay to have a group called "black women for Harris" but "white men for Trump" would be a hate group. It doesn't make sense.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

The White Dudes for Harris call raised almost $4 million for Harris which pissed off Elon “Free Speech” Musk so much that he suspended its Twitter account.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The White Dudes for Harris call raised almost $4 million for Harris which pissed off Elon “Free Speech” Musk so much that he suspended its Twitter account.

Loved seeing Jeff - Big Lebowski - Bridges on the call! Musk is such a whiny little weirdo.