Les Miserables

[Anonymous]

sucked. It was like a SNL parady of a crappy musical.

I also though Lincoln sucked. Boring and non-historical.

Am I the only one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:sucked. It was like a SNL parady of a crappy musical.

I also though Lincoln sucked. Boring and non-historical.

Am I the only one?

I loved it.

[Anonymous]

Loved it & so did my 12 yr old ds

[Anonymous]

Saw Les Mis and loved it! thought it was well done and the singing was good. I'm sure it's going to win a lot of awards due to all the A list actors and actresses.

[Anonymous]

I loved it bc it was les Miz and it was epic. The scenery and cinematography were great and they did a nice job filling in some of the plot holes from the show. Unfortunately Russell Crowe just doesn't have the voice to carry Javert and Hugh Jackman was so nasal and just not a believeable Jean Valjean. Obviously those two are at the heart of the whole thing so that was a big letdown. I feel like they sacrificed better voices to get big name actors, which I guess they may have had to do to make money. I did, however, think Anne Hathaway was better than I expected, as was Amanda Seyfried and the girl who played Eponine. Gavroche was awesome. And I loved the appearance of Colm Wilkinson (original Jean Valjean, or at least the guy who is on the soundtrack) as the bishop. Plus Jonathan Groff as Enjolras was perfect-- I love him!

[Anonymous]

loved les mis and liked lincoln very mucb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I loved it bc it was les Miz and it was epic. The scenery and cinematography were great and they did a nice job filling in some of the plot holes from the show. Unfortunately Russell Crowe just doesn't have the voice to carry Javert and Hugh Jackman was so nasal and just not a believeable Jean Valjean. Obviously those two are at the heart of the whole thing so that was a big letdown. I feel like they sacrificed better voices to get big name actors, which I guess they may have had to do to make money. I did, however, think Anne Hathaway was better than I expected, as was Amanda Seyfried and the girl who played Eponine. Gavroche was awesome. And I loved the appearance of Colm Wilkinson (original Jean Valjean, or at least the guy who is on the soundtrack) as the bishop. Plus Jonathan Groff as Enjolras was perfect-- I love him!

Whoops that wasn't Jonathan Groff, it was the guy from Next to Normal--Aaron Tveit. I loved Next to Normal and Spring Awakening at the same time and was thrown off by the period dress . He was great though.

[Anonymous]

Anyone planning on just NEVER seeing this movie?

I clicked to see if there was any info on here that would sway me, but nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone planning on just NEVER seeing this movie?

I clicked to see if there was any info on here that would sway me, but nope.

Most of the PPs said good or great things about it. What exactly were you looking to hear?

[Anonymous]

I adored it! They did give up some of the musical talent in favor of visual drama, no doubt about it. I disagree with PP's comments on Hugh Jackman, though. I thought Hugh Jackman and Anne Hathaway were amazing. I was blown away by Anne Hathaway's Fantine! Russell Crowe did a great job acting as Javert but yeah - the singing was clearly not up to par. That said, I was surprised he sang that well . . . but he was clearly outshined in that department.

I thought Marius was totally miscast! His voice was horrid, he sounded like a nasal goat. They absolutely should have found someone, anyone, else for that part.

I thought the Thenardier's were fabulous! Sasha Baren Cohen and Helena Bohnam Carter stole the show.

[Anonymous]

I hated it also OP. And while Lincoln was a better movie I found it irritating too.

[Anonymous]

It was a treat to watch Daniel Day Lewis' acting in Lincoln. That said, the moments where everyone broke out into speeches seemed pretty contrived. And what was with the 1/2 hour of adds for really violent video games, at the SS Majestic, before this thoughtful movie on history and war and peace even started?

[Anonymous]

Can't wait to see Les Mis as everyone who has seen it said it was great. I saw Lincoln and was underwhelmed. I just expected Lincoln's voice to be deeper so the entire movie, it bothered me. It was also way too long!

[Anonymous]

It is on record that Lincoln reslly had an even higher pitched voice than Daniel Day-Lewis used in the movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I loved it bc it was les Miz and it was epic. The scenery and cinematography were great and they did a nice job filling in some of the plot holes from the show. Unfortunately Russell Crowe just doesn't have the voice to carry Javert and Hugh Jackman was so nasal and just not a believeable Jean Valjean. Obviously those two are at the heart of the whole thing so that was a big letdown. I feel like they sacrificed better voices to get big name actors, which I guess they may have had to do to make money. I did, however, think Anne Hathaway was better than I expected, as was Amanda Seyfried and the girl who played Eponine. Gavroche was awesome. And I loved the appearance of Colm Wilkinson (original Jean Valjean, or at least the guy who is on the soundtrack) as the bishop. Plus Jonathan Groff as Enjolras was perfect-- I love him!

She should be good -- played Eponine in the West End.