This is true for me. I have an only and I find every milestone and achievement and development so rewarding, whether it's learning to read or hearing she had terrific manners at a friend's house. I see the appeal of more kids (I love this one dearly, why not have more kids to love). But I also recognize that with multiple kids, my relationship withy DD would change, and I like our dynamic a lot. There's something very pleasant about her being my only daughter and me being her only mother. I know my DH feels similarly. I also don't find parenting overwhelming. To me, one is just right. |
It's relaxing for me to hang out with my kids, actually. Not snark, |
Same. Youngest of six and none of us had large families. My parents were great people but it was a lot. I was raised a lot by my siblings and that got tiresome. They all knew what was best for me, etc. Important emotional things fell through the cracks. We had plenty of money and wanted for nothing, including education but there just was not enough parenting to go around, my mom was a SAHM too. It’s not the same to get nurturing from siblings. You want your parents more. |
Well NFP doesn’t really work so so much for “discerning.” |
It’s kind of pathetic to look for ROI in your children. Is that all your life is about? Intensely investing in your kids and looking forward to bragging about them when they perform well? |
That’s just not true. I am in a group of higher order multiples, so many of us had 3 plus a sibling in that time frame and a couple had quadruplets. They are well cared for children. |
There is so much wrong with what you’ve just written. What you’ve described isn’t a healthy dynamic either. |
[youtube] Lots of parents fulfillment and joy out of seeing their intensive time investment in 1 or 2 children pay off. When they win awards for academics or special skills and get admitted to selective schools or camps, you feel great about all the time you spent together helping them hone those talents and achieve those elite goals.
I know there can be high-achievers from large families, usually the oldest child, but you just can't spend as much time with your golden child when you have 4-5 ankle biters needing this and that
|
|
I’m pretty sure tim and his wife had all their kids early…they didn’t keep going for an infinite number. Six isn’t sixteen. |
I go to a conservative Catholic Church with many families that have 5-10 kids. The moms are … way better than you think and are for the most part wonderful. They do not keep an eagle eye on their kids at all times, but did your mom? This kind of “attention” leads to really anxious and entitled kids. The hardcore catholic moms don’t do screens, that’s for sure.
What matters more than raw number is birth spacing. After the first kid or two, it’s important to slow down so that everybody has a chance to be the baby for a few years. I know a family (not at the church, actually — a doctor and a part time lawyer) that is expecting number 5; the oldest might not be seven yet. That looks rough on everybody to me. |
Next kid in line, a boy, also helps all the time. Helped his younger brother with math homework the other night then played in the backyard with the toddler while I made dinner. Also A student and an athlete. We just somehow manage to inculcate helpful attitudes and achievement despite having five horribly neglected kids! |
I realize that attitudes about raising accomplished kids are just a product of neoliberalism and the society in which we live, but this attitude is worth questioning.
My oldest has special needs and his younger siblings have given me so much needed perspective. My children are not products on which I expect a return. They are beings with souls. Not even religious but the conservatives have a point. But I can’t support forcing anyone to have a kid, so it ends there for me. |
No, and low contact is the result of it. The existence of my younger sibling(and the typical unfair treatment associated with it) is a huge reason. |
Sarcasm doesn’t work when you’re just telling the truth. |