Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.


Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.

I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.



Show me the money


They’ll just demand and get more money to waste.


They just got rejected for their full budget so I don’t see them spending more on busing for “demographics.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.


Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.

I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.



Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.


Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?


If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is as racist as you and will only move somewhere where the schools are white I mean good (which is what you are basically saying). If the neighborhood is good and your kid can excel at school there is no issue. There is an issue however with your “white” priviledge. You are living in a predominently white nice neighborhood because of segregation and oppression. If you can’t get that them I am sorry…


This is why Trump won.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.


Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.

I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.



Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.


Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?


If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.


This is dated but has farms rates by schools.
https://www.creativemoco.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/MCPS-FARMS-Rates-2017-2018-1.pdf
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is as racist as you and will only move somewhere where the schools are white I mean good (which is what you are basically saying). If the neighborhood is good and your kid can excel at school there is no issue. There is an issue however with your “white” priviledge. You are living in a predominently white nice neighborhood because of segregation and oppression. If you can’t get that them I am sorry…


This is why Trump won.


And he will win again bc of people like MoCo progressives.

Sincerely,
-Democrat who wants to win

PS - Mahmoud v Taylor
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.


Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.

I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.



Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.


Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?


If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.


There are no Title I high schools in MCPS.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/dtecps/title1/schools/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.


Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.

I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.



Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.


Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?


If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.


There are no Title I high schools in MCPS.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/dtecps/title1/schools/


Thank you. I wonder why the percentages don’t apply to the high schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yeah I think if the primary goal was utilization then option 2 is the only answer. Or some other solution for options 1 and 4 that lets kids in overcrowded schools choose to go to underutilized schools (without providing busing).


Is 2 the utilization option? I think they will go for that with some tweaks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is as racist as you and will only move somewhere where the schools are white I mean good (which is what you are basically saying). If the neighborhood is good and your kid can excel at school there is no issue. There is an issue however with your “white” priviledge. You are living in a predominently white nice neighborhood because of segregation and oppression. If you can’t get that them I am sorry…


This is why Trump won.



Agreed and it is so depressing because he is doing so much damage.

Also WJ isn’t all white not that you care about facts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.


Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.

I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.



Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.


Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?


If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.


There are no Title I high schools in MCPS.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/dtecps/title1/schools/


Thank you. I wonder why the percentages don’t apply to the high schools.


So some folks are falsely stating that segregation is in low income kids' best interest because they get more funding that way, except they don't. DCUM, never change.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is as racist as you and will only move somewhere where the schools are white I mean good (which is what you are basically saying). If the neighborhood is good and your kid can excel at school there is no issue. There is an issue however with your “white” priviledge. You are living in a predominently white nice neighborhood because of segregation and oppression. If you can’t get that them I am sorry…


This is why Trump won.


Trump is trying to help low income families. Yes, even brown families.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
You purchased an asset that can go up and down in value. Grow up and stop trying to influence school policies so you can benefit from a property value that is rooted in segregation.

This!


Title I and Focus schools
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.


Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.

I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.



Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.


Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?


If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.


There are no Title I high schools in MCPS.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/dtecps/title1/schools/


Thank you. I wonder why the percentages don’t apply to the high schools.


So some folks are falsely stating that segregation is in low income kids' best interest because they get more funding that way, except they don't. DCUM, never change.


Well this is overall false. Schools losing title 1 status do lose funding and title I status is based on high farms rates. Why McPS doesn’t allocate any farms money to high schools despite high farms rates is…well no one seems to know.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why are you talking about property values again??! Please just STOP! This is about children and schools..


I don't have kids in school and planning to downsize. Losing 100-200K is huge for me. I suspect that will happen with 30% FARMS.
40-50% FARMS will actually result in a bigger drop and I won't have any equity left for retirement.



Your house is not a good retirement plan. It’s not going to impact things.


Its a big chunk of my net worth and I was going to downsize soon. It was surely a big part of my retiurement plan.


You purchased an asset that can go up and down in value. Grow up and stop trying to influence school policies so you can benefit from a property value that is rooted in segregation.


I don't think anyone should criticize seniors for taking action which will help them. It not segregation right now. You can be black, brown, white, yellow or whatever and you can buy wherever you want.
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: