So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?
I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.
They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.
Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.
How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.
The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.
Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.
You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.
You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?
You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?
Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.
*lusting
More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.
Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)
The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.
So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.
For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.
Both seem extremely unlikely but you are entitled to your dreams.
There's definitely a higher chance Parliament will investigate Andrew and his Epstein connections, including Trump, than there is of the current US Congress investigating the orange dumpster fire. Already a parliamentary subcommittee has asked for info on Andrew's lease. Keir Starmer has expressed support for an investigation into all Crown Estate leases. And several in parliament have expressed support for a full investigation into the real issue, which is Andrew's pedo activities. Fingers crossed.
Merrick Garland sat on the Epstein files and given how much his DOJ hated Trump and threw everything plus the kitchen sink at him, that somehow no one leaked incriminating info about Trump and Epstein would be very weird, frankly, implausible. Meanwhile Trump was campaigning on releasing the files and he talked openly about it for a long time. It would be amazing bluster from him if he was genuinely involved in a bad way.
It is interesting that both parties, despite hating each other, somehow can't or wouldn't reveal the files. The concept of the files has grown into something much bigger than they may really be. These talks about investigating the files in Parliament is clearly a form of distraction from Labour's many other problems, including total abysmal approval ratings. In other words, I read nothing meaningful in these promises and expect nothing will happen.
It’s very clear the current US administration and Congress won’t release anything or investigate anything—nobody here has said anything different. Although the comment about “amazing bluster” from Trump is lol.
Who cares about Parliament’s motives if they get it done.
Come back when Labour takes it up. Lib Dems aren’t going to get anything done.
Some MPs have called for an investigation. All Andrew has to say is that he saw Trump on Epstein Isle with young women and it's all over for Trump. Don't even see how Trump could finish out his term after that. C'mon, Brits, get it done!
Why would he want to do that? More likely, he would say he doesn't remember.
Why would Andrew want to protect Trump? He has no reason to protect Trump. Andrew might care about the monarchy enough to protect any members from damaging info on what they knew about him and when. But also, Andrew does have all the dirt on the BRF, and there’s lots of speculation in Britain that this is why Charles and William are going so easy on him: they also don’t want an impoverished Andrew writing Spare II or spilling to investigators.
So in any British investigation you could totally see Andrew feeding the investigators something about Epstein’s overseas/US clients while holding back on the BRF.
Speculation among who?
The BRF stripped Andrew of all his titles, including titles due to him by right of birth, kicked him out of his fancy house, publicly humiliated him in front of the entire country. And you're claiming they went easy on him?
So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?
I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.
They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.
Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.
How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.
The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.
Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.
You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.
You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?
You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?
Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.
*lusting
More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.
Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)
The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.
So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.
For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.
Both seem extremely unlikely but you are entitled to your dreams.
There's definitely a higher chance Parliament will investigate Andrew and his Epstein connections, including Trump, than there is of the current US Congress investigating the orange dumpster fire. Already a parliamentary subcommittee has asked for info on Andrew's lease. Keir Starmer has expressed support for an investigation into all Crown Estate leases. And several in parliament have expressed support for a full investigation into the real issue, which is Andrew's pedo activities. Fingers crossed.
Merrick Garland sat on the Epstein files and given how much his DOJ hated Trump and threw everything plus the kitchen sink at him, that somehow no one leaked incriminating info about Trump and Epstein would be very weird, frankly, implausible. Meanwhile Trump was campaigning on releasing the files and he talked openly about it for a long time. It would be amazing bluster from him if he was genuinely involved in a bad way.
It is interesting that both parties, despite hating each other, somehow can't or wouldn't reveal the files. The concept of the files has grown into something much bigger than they may really be. These talks about investigating the files in Parliament is clearly a form of distraction from Labour's many other problems, including total abysmal approval ratings. In other words, I read nothing meaningful in these promises and expect nothing will happen.
It’s very clear the current US administration and Congress won’t release anything or investigate anything—nobody here has said anything different. Although the comment about “amazing bluster” from Trump is lol.
Who cares about Parliament’s motives if they get it done.
Come back when Labour takes it up. Lib Dems aren’t going to get anything done.
Some MPs have called for an investigation. All Andrew has to say is that he saw Trump on Epstein Isle with young women and it's all over for Trump. Don't even see how Trump could finish out his term after that. C'mon, Brits, get it done!
LOL! Trump has sex with a porn star, raped a woman and 34 felony counts and stupid republicans voted for him…AGAIN!
Yes republicans are the party of pedos
It’s disgusting
Both parties have their fair share. Bill Clinton was on the Lolita Express more than any other politician.
.
Since we haven’t seen the files you don’t know if that’s true about Clinton. Wouldn’t be surprised if Trump was number one since they seemed to such good friends.
So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?
I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.
They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.
Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.
How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.
The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.
Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.
You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.
You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?
You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?
Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.
*lusting
More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.
Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)
The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.
So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.
For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.
Both seem extremely unlikely but you are entitled to your dreams.
There's definitely a higher chance Parliament will investigate Andrew and his Epstein connections, including Trump, than there is of the current US Congress investigating the orange dumpster fire. Already a parliamentary subcommittee has asked for info on Andrew's lease. Keir Starmer has expressed support for an investigation into all Crown Estate leases. And several in parliament have expressed support for a full investigation into the real issue, which is Andrew's pedo activities. Fingers crossed.
Merrick Garland sat on the Epstein files and given how much his DOJ hated Trump and threw everything plus the kitchen sink at him, that somehow no one leaked incriminating info about Trump and Epstein would be very weird, frankly, implausible. Meanwhile Trump was campaigning on releasing the files and he talked openly about it for a long time. It would be amazing bluster from him if he was genuinely involved in a bad way.
It is interesting that both parties, despite hating each other, somehow can't or wouldn't reveal the files. The concept of the files has grown into something much bigger than they may really be. These talks about investigating the files in Parliament is clearly a form of distraction from Labour's many other problems, including total abysmal approval ratings. In other words, I read nothing meaningful in these promises and expect nothing will happen.
It’s very clear the current US administration and Congress won’t release anything or investigate anything—nobody here has said anything different. Although the comment about “amazing bluster” from Trump is lol.
Who cares about Parliament’s motives if they get it done.
Come back when Labour takes it up. Lib Dems aren’t going to get anything done.
Some MPs have called for an investigation. All Andrew has to say is that he saw Trump on Epstein Isle with young women and it's all over for Trump. Don't even see how Trump could finish out his term after that. C'mon, Brits, get it done!
LOL! Trump has sex with a porn star, raped a woman and 34 felony counts and stupid republicans voted for him…AGAIN!
Yes republicans are the party of pedos
It’s disgusting
Both parties have their fair share. Bill Clinton was on the Lolita Express more than any other politician.
.
Since we haven’t seen the files you don’t know if that’s true about Clinton. Wouldn’t be surprised if Trump was number one since they seemed to such good friends.
+1. Trump is the one pictured partying with Epstein at Mar al Lago, the one who wrote salacious things in Epstein's birthday book, the one who with Epstein judged teen girls for a calendar, the one who owned the club where Epstein poached young girls like Virginia Giuffre.
Article says Andrew is probably afraid to set foot on US soil. But he could testify by Zoom.
He’s denied any wrongdoing from the start. I highly doubt he would say anything helpful. Throwing anyone else under the bus would confirm his own proximity to the problem.
New emails between Andrew and Epstein are supposed to be coming out soon. (Who's been sitting on these and why are they releasing them now?) If they're incriminating, Andrew could face charges for working with traffickers. He could conceivably get a lighter sentence for cooperating and implicating others.
Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.
Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.
In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.
He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.
Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!
Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.
In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.
He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.
Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!
You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.
Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.
In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.
He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.
Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute!
You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked.
How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?
So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?
I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.
They don't even need to go to such lengths. They can simply subpoena the many Americans with information. Or make a deal with Ghislaine.
Trump and his pet attorneys and judges aren’t going to allow that. Why the Brits needs to get Andrew to spill.
How do you propose they do that? They aren't exactly stopping him from doing that now.
The palace is trying to stop Parliament from making Andrew testify. Below is just one of many reports about why--Charles and William don't want a broader investigation into royal finances, leases on Crown Estate properties, and the rest. Which is really too bad, because this is one of the few opportunities where some investigative body would let Andrew go full blast on Epstein and Trump.
Sorry, MAGA pedo defender. There’s many more pictures and a long history of Trump and Epstein, sometimes with Andrew in the same pic. If Clinton raped children then go after him. But Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files says it all about Trump.
You are all over the place. You're laser focused on Andrew ignoring all the available Americans who can testify. Andrew is not the glue holding all the together. Just says you're not really looking out for victims as you keep claiming.
You do realize you’re fighting/trolling with multiple posters who are appalled you’re defending Andrew and Trump, right?
You do realize nobody has defended them in any way? And that more than one person keeps pointing this out?
Actually, one poster said that listing after young teens was just fine. And the MAGAs here seem really opposed to real consequences for Andrew.
*lusting
More lies. Nobody here has said anything of the sort. Demanding he testify when he hasn't even been asked is not opposing consequences. There is a process to be followed that nobody has even initiated.
Calm down, you’re misunderstanding. Yes, people here want Andrew to testify (to spill on Epstein’s operation and probably on Trump) or not to testify (because they don’t think lusting after teens is bad—someone here absolutely said “ephobophilia is ok” close to the beginning of this thread—or because they don’t want Trump and/or the BRF’s finances exposed.)
The point, which you keep missing, is that some in Parliament actually want to initiate the process. But lots of press have reported that the palace is leaning on Parliament not to initiate the process to investigate, in fact BP issued s real-life statement saying an investigation would “distract” Parliament from other issues. So Parliament is in limbo, and may investigate, or may not investigate. Whining about “nobody has initiated the process” looks like you’re either ignorant or trying to shut down discussion by insulting other posters, although surely you’d never want to do that. Hope that clears it up.
So you want Andrew to just show up without being asked to “testify” ? Seems like you’re angry at the wrong people.
For those of you in the back seats (not for this troll): Andrew probably has dirt on Trump's relationship with Epstein (see: pictures of Andrew, Trump, and Epstein together at Mar al Lago) that could potentially bring the orange dirtbag down, and maybe also on Clinton and lots of other rich men. To get this information, either (1) the US Congress needs to do a thorough investigation into Epstein, including issuing subpoenas to lots of people involved with Epstein. Or (2) Parliament needs to defy Charles and William and force Andrew to testify. At this point, a Parliamentary inquiry seems more likely.
Both seem extremely unlikely but you are entitled to your dreams.
There's definitely a higher chance Parliament will investigate Andrew and his Epstein connections, including Trump, than there is of the current US Congress investigating the orange dumpster fire. Already a parliamentary subcommittee has asked for info on Andrew's lease. Keir Starmer has expressed support for an investigation into all Crown Estate leases. And several in parliament have expressed support for a full investigation into the real issue, which is Andrew's pedo activities. Fingers crossed.
Merrick Garland sat on the Epstein files and given how much his DOJ hated Trump and threw everything plus the kitchen sink at him, that somehow no one leaked incriminating info about Trump and Epstein would be very weird, frankly, implausible. Meanwhile Trump was campaigning on releasing the files and he talked openly about it for a long time. It would be amazing bluster from him if he was genuinely involved in a bad way.
It is interesting that both parties, despite hating each other, somehow can't or wouldn't reveal the files. The concept of the files has grown into something much bigger than they may really be. These talks about investigating the files in Parliament is clearly a form of distraction from Labour's many other problems, including total abysmal approval ratings. In other words, I read nothing meaningful in these promises and expect nothing will happen.
It’s very clear the current US administration and Congress won’t release anything or investigate anything—nobody here has said anything different. Although the comment about “amazing bluster” from Trump is lol.
Who cares about Parliament’s motives if they get it done.
Come back when Labour takes it up. Lib Dems aren’t going to get anything done.
Some MPs have called for an investigation. All Andrew has to say is that he saw Trump on Epstein Isle with young women and it's all over for Trump. Don't even see how Trump could finish out his term after that. C'mon, Brits, get it done!
Why would he want to do that? More likely, he would say he doesn't remember.
Why would Andrew want to protect Trump? He has no reason to protect Trump. Andrew might care about the monarchy enough to protect any members from damaging info on what they knew about him and when. But also, Andrew does have all the dirt on the BRF, and there’s lots of speculation in Britain that this is why Charles and William are going so easy on him: they also don’t want an impoverished Andrew writing Spare II or spilling to investigators.
So in any British investigation you could totally see Andrew feeding the investigators something about Epstein’s overseas/US clients while holding back on the BRF.
Speculation among who?
The BRF stripped Andrew of all his titles, including titles due to him by right of birth, kicked him out of his fancy house, publicly humiliated him in front of the entire country. And you're claiming they went easy on him?
He has avoided jail.
THE BRF has done more than "we" have. We gave our list members leadership positions in the federal government and the highest office. We also moved the coconspirator to a "prison" camp and gave her a puppy.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}