There hasn’t been an iota of evidence for the headline. It’s usually customary to provide some evidence to support it. Where is it? |
Snopes did a Fact Check on an InTouch article that got a lot of publicity.
We rated this claim "Unproven" because the alleged sources in the In Touch Weekly article were anonymous and, therefore, we were unable to track them down to independently verify their claims. Snopes contacted the publication asking for information on how it reported the story. Fact Check: King Charles III Was Allegedly Diagnosed with Pancreatic Cancer, Given 2 Years To Live. We Looked for Verification |
There are all kinds of people who tout themselves as “royal experts” or “royal insiders” and they were completely wrong about these recent royal health situations. Like, one of the more well-known ones claimed Kate’s abdominal surgery was her donating a kidney. When it comes down to it, none of them know anything of importance. They’re fed gossipy tidbits and that’s all they’ve got. I would hope that especially after the completely off-base stories recently that people would realize they’re just making things up. But I fear that will soon be forgotten when the next juicy story comes out.
|
thank goodness you'll be able to set us straight about when RF, KP, rota, etc, are giving us true facts or photoshopping them. |
Who could question the integrity of Lady C? |
God save the King. |
The next big royal event is trooping the colour in mid-June. It’s usually the last thing many of them do before summer break.
Will the king ride a horse? Go in a carriage? Just appear on the balcony? |
I just hope Catherine is well. 🙏 |
and all the spares 🙏🙏🙏 |
+1. Often it’s clear these so-called “experts” and “insiders” are just speculating (“Will and Kate won’t want to meet Harry when he comes to Britain”). But outlets like the DM are desperate for royals coverage these days, so these so-called “experts” and “insiders” are making bank. |
But the BRF likes for it to be this way. They have these tabloid publications on the royal rota. They would rather have these tabloids out there reporting a mix of truths and falsehoods, and the ability to plant stories without them having to be verified since it's all reported anonymously, than become irrelevant. |
Or risk getting photographed actually working? Charles gets it but Will doesn’t. |
(Doesn't like Prince William, but uses a diminutive of his name.) |
Why does anyone in the US use the titles? The US partially exists in opposition to the notion of leadership by blood.
I’m sure plenty of empire/commonwealth countries could care a less if the blood line of their oppressors had cancer. The were having a toast when the “queen” died. |
Blasphemy. Off with thee head. Or on DCUM, bye. |