Young Men are Becoming More Sexist - It's About Status

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If and when these young men could actually attract a mate and possibly father a daughter....all of sudden sexist men are not so great anymore.

You would be amazed at what your daughters would tolerate if the guy is hot.

Know of many "lefty" women who became reliable conservatives upon meeting their husband. Women's politics are quite fluid.

She can vote for a democrat in presidential election, even if her husband is in the booth next to her. What do you think women did when they finally had voting rights, but controlling, misogynistic husbands? Men are clueless. Women are crafty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poster is big mad that women see a doctor when sick and men are dum dums that don’t.
It’s women’s fault that men to seek out care.
Checks out.

Ignorant, dumb post full of assumption. I bet you painted broad strokes before too about black people. Dear black people, if you are sick, why didn’t you just go to the doctor, duh?

Never mind the fact that that ignores a massive amount of history of distrust in the medical care system by the black community die to egregious history like Tuskegee experimentation.

“DeAr MaLEs, If SicK Y u No GO tO DoCTOr’S dUh!!”


Maybe it has never occurred to your infantile brain that there is a larger societal issue that primarily affects men more than women that makes them more hesitant to access healthcare (just like black community for years was distrusting of doctors)? If so, that needs to be addressed through more public health spending directly targeting men. Sure, there are some men who don’t go due to superhero syndrome, but the reasons men go for less are way more nuanced and complicated than your peon brain can comprehend:

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-so-many-men-avoid-doctors#The-reasons-men-stay-away-from-their-doctors

https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2019/survey-men-avoiding-doctors.html

https://newsroom.clevelandclinic.org/2019/09/04/cleveland-clinic-survey-men-will-do-almost-anything-to-avoid-going-to-the-doctor


The failure of the healthcare system to provide routine preventative medicine for men is the single greatest - and silent - public healthcare disaster that currently exists. There is a total lack of spending on education and public service initiatives to specifically address men’s needs in order to reduce a huge gender gap in accessing healthcare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

“I’m impervious to facts regarding women’s sexual assault in the military”
Noted.

No, I’m not impervious to it. I just think that men carry the same burden as well in the military, and in any event why is it fair to punish men with a sharply higher risk of death due to being drafted because the military as a whole doesn’t manage sex assault? The benefit women get by not being drafted is disproportionate. Sex assault is bad, being killed is worse. It is grossly unfair to make young men bear the worst burden of the draft.

We do not have a draft in this country. So wtf are you prattling on about? And your death vs rape comparison is ignorant. You should enlist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poster is big mad that women see a doctor when sick and men are dum dums that don’t.
It’s women’s fault that men to seek out care.
Checks out.

Ignorant, dumb post full of assumption. I bet you painted broad strokes before too about black people. Dear black people, if you are sick, why didn’t you just go to the doctor, duh?

Never mind the fact that that ignores a massive amount of history of distrust in the medical care system by the black community die to egregious history like Tuskegee experimentation.

“DeAr MaLEs, If SicK Y u No GO tO DoCTOr’S dUh!!”


Maybe it has never occurred to your infantile brain that there is a larger societal issue that primarily affects men more than women that makes them more hesitant to access healthcare (just like black community for years was distrusting of doctors)? If so, that needs to be addressed through more public health spending directly targeting men. Sure, there are some men who don’t go due to superhero syndrome, but the reasons men go for less are way more nuanced and complicated than your peon brain can comprehend:

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-so-many-men-avoid-doctors#The-reasons-men-stay-away-from-their-doctors

https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2019/survey-men-avoiding-doctors.html

https://newsroom.clevelandclinic.org/2019/09/04/cleveland-clinic-survey-men-will-do-almost-anything-to-avoid-going-to-the-doctor


The failure of the healthcare system to provide routine preventative medicine for men is the single greatest - and silent - public healthcare disaster that currently exists. There is a total lack of spending on education and public service initiatives to specifically address men’s needs in order to reduce a huge gender gap in accessing healthcare.

Blah blah blah no one cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

“I’m impervious to facts regarding women’s sexual assault in the military”
Noted.

No, I’m not impervious to it. I just think that men carry the same burden as well in the military, and in any event why is it fair to punish men with a sharply higher risk of death due to being drafted because the military as a whole doesn’t manage sex assault? The benefit women get by not being drafted is disproportionate. Sex assault is bad, being killed is worse. It is grossly unfair to make young men bear the worst burden of the draft.

We do not have a draft in this country. So wtf are you prattling on about? And your death vs rape comparison is ignorant. You should enlist.

Pretty sure that guy did enlist, which is why he won’t stop commenting about military service in every single post, when it is tangentially related at best to the topic at hand.

Dude, we get it.

“Thank you for your service”

Please try to direct your incessant military chat to the group of people this thread is talking about - low status men.

Or is that too triggering for you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, it is young republican men.

Don't forget, in the eyes of the GOP, liberal men aren't real men.

If they are white and American, probably. But this discussion was about worldwide trends.

And the two posters above reflect prejudice, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poster is big mad that women see a doctor when sick and men are dum dums that don’t.
It’s women’s fault that men to seek out care.
Checks out.

Ignorant, dumb post full of assumption. I bet you painted broad strokes before too about black people. Dear black people, if you are sick, why didn’t you just go to the doctor, duh?

Never mind the fact that that ignores a massive amount of history of distrust in the medical care system by the black community die to egregious history like Tuskegee experimentation.

“DeAr MaLEs, If SicK Y u No GO tO DoCTOr’S dUh!!”


Maybe it has never occurred to your infantile brain that there is a larger societal issue that primarily affects men more than women that makes them more hesitant to access healthcare (just like black community for years was distrusting of doctors)? If so, that needs to be addressed through more public health spending directly targeting men. Sure, there are some men who don’t go due to superhero syndrome, but the reasons men go for less are way more nuanced and complicated than your peon brain can comprehend:

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-so-many-men-avoid-doctors#The-reasons-men-stay-away-from-their-doctors

https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2019/survey-men-avoiding-doctors.html

https://newsroom.clevelandclinic.org/2019/09/04/cleveland-clinic-survey-men-will-do-almost-anything-to-avoid-going-to-the-doctor


The failure of the healthcare system to provide routine preventative medicine for men is the single greatest - and silent - public healthcare disaster that currently exists. There is a total lack of spending on education and public service initiatives to specifically address men’s needs in order to reduce a huge gender gap in accessing healthcare.

Blah blah blah no one cares.

I think you missed your dose of Midol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I was struck recently when leaders from three top-10 schools were called to address congress about antisemitism on campus. All 3 college presidents were female. Have females really become THAT successful so they deserve to lead MIT, Harvard, and U-Penn all AT THE SAME TIME? Really? All THREE schools?

You sound like a Ferengi. Also, I'll bet I wouldn't have to look very hard for a period of time in which all three schools were led by men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of you idiots have watched the video about the imbalance in dataing apps - so your knee-jerk reactions are way offbase!

I'll listen to your opinions when you act responsibly to understand the very valid mathematical analysis in the video, backed up by facts, not emotions!

I'm not going to rely on YouTube for a clear take on the way things are in the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If and when these young men could actually attract a mate and possibly father a daughter....all of sudden sexist men are not so great anymore.

You would be amazed at what your daughters would tolerate if the guy is hot.

Know of many "lefty" women who became reliable conservatives upon meeting their husband. Women's politics are quite fluid.

She can vote for a democrat in presidential election, even if her husband is in the booth next to her. What do you think women did when they finally had voting rights, but controlling, misogynistic husbands? Men are clueless. Women are crafty.

Men are clueless but also simultaneously responsible for keeping all of the smart and crafty women down. Sure that makes sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess you didn't watch the youtube with Donnie Deutsch and James Carville?

This whole thread is why Carville said we're gonna lose. Take a hint - stop looking down your nose at someone who doesn't think like you or it's going to cost you dearly in 2024.

I hope Carville is not prescient. We see a host of this sort of behavior on multiple issues (and that's what a lot or Trump voters are voting against).

Carville said that Mitch McConnell and Lindsay Graham were going to turn on Trump after Labor Day in 2020. He says a lot of shit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I was struck recently when leaders from three top-10 schools were called to address congress about antisemitism on campus. All 3 college presidents were female. Have females really become THAT successful so they deserve to lead MIT, Harvard, and U-Penn all AT THE SAME TIME? Really? All THREE schools?

You sound like a Ferengi. Also, I'll bet I wouldn't have to look very hard for a period of time in which all three schools were led by men.

But when the leaders are all men that’s bad and needs to be addressed through laws and incentives but when all of the leaders are women then everything is great? That basically proves the point that you are arguing against.

[Anonymous]

lol. All you sexist, misogynist men are getting your way now. You want to dominate the world? To dominate women? Women are now being replaced by men even in gender terms. Enjoy your transgender brides. Have at it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I was struck recently when leaders from three top-10 schools were called to address congress about antisemitism on campus. All 3 college presidents were female. Have females really become THAT successful so they deserve to lead MIT, Harvard, and U-Penn all AT THE SAME TIME? Really? All THREE schools?

You sound like a Ferengi. Also, I'll bet I wouldn't have to look very hard for a period of time in which all three schools were led by men.

But when the leaders are all men that’s bad and needs to be addressed through laws and incentives but when all of the leaders are women then everything is great? That basically proves the point that you are arguing against.

Except the sample size was three schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:(this is a follow-on message to my previous one about dating for 18-28 yr olds males).

I am a 62-yr old left-leaning male.

I was struck recently when leaders from three top-10 schools were called to address congress about antisemitism on campus. All 3 college presidents were female. Have females really become THAT successful so they deserve to lead MIT, Harvard, and U-Penn all AT THE SAME TIME? Really? All THREE schools?

This crap is not new. I have been the victim in the past of "reverse discrimination" in the past, when jobs were reserved for "vagina-holders only" when I graduated with a PhD in Engineering and the job market was extremely tight. My female office mate attended a super computing conference, didn't have a paper, didn't have any qualifications, and was invited to interview for a professorship at a school - sight unseen - without even asking! The affirmative action people were chasing women that hard!

We all saw another women interview at our university and she gave a terrible talk and had a terrible thesis ("but she's female and from a higher ranked school so it matters not!") The reverse discrimination was disgusting to females and males alike, and this was way back in the 1980s, no need for more of this crap in the 2010s or 2020s.

You must have been equally concerned when those schools were exclusively run by men, right? Like how it was for years and years…

I wouldn't even engage with this guy. If he really is an academic, I feel sorry for his students. He clearly hates woman. The university was right to not promote him. I'd rather promote someone without a conference at a paper than someone screaming about "vagina-holders only." DH would agree with me. But, he's not threatened by women, and lo-and-behold, is much more successful than pp.