‘Very unwell’ King Charles’ funeral plans reportedly being updated amid cancer battle: ‘It’s not good’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charles was out doing stuff today.

Eeek! Looks very frail.

He looks pretty darn good for being "very unwell" in a situation that's "not good". He looks..... the same.

My thoughts too, and this is a guy who's undergoing chemo. He looks the same.

He was visiting a cancer center, BTW. In these pictures from the DM ( ) he's shaking several peoples' hands and exposing himself to germs, so he can't be that frail.

Maybe chemo done. Usually limit exposure during treatments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charles was out doing stuff today.

Eeek! Looks very frail.

He looks pretty darn good for being "very unwell" in a situation that's "not good". He looks..... the same.

My thoughts too, and this is a guy who's undergoing chemo. He looks the same.

He was visiting a cancer center, BTW. In these pictures from the DM ( ) he's shaking several peoples' hands and exposing himself to germs, so he can't be that frail.

Maybe chemo done. Usually limit exposure during treatments.

If he was still frail, in the sense of having ongoing health/cancer issues or even a slow recovery from (done) chemo, he still wouldn't be out there shaking multiple strangers' hands. I'm with the poster who says he looks the same as before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charles was out doing stuff today.

Eeek! Looks very frail.

He looks pretty darn good for being "very unwell" in a situation that's "not good". He looks..... the same.

My thoughts too, and this is a guy who's undergoing chemo. He looks the same.

He was visiting a cancer center, BTW. In these pictures from the DM ( ) he's shaking several peoples' hands and exposing himself to germs, so he can't be that frail.

Maybe chemo done. Usually limit exposure during treatments.

If he was still frail, in the sense of having ongoing health/cancer issues or even a slow recovery from (done) chemo, he still wouldn't be out there shaking multiple strangers' hands. I'm with the poster who says he looks the same as before.

* If he were still frail.... * Don't want to get dinged by the royal fangirls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charles was out doing stuff today.

Eeek! Looks very frail.

He looks pretty darn good for being "very unwell" in a situation that's "not good". He looks..... the same.

My thoughts too, and this is a guy who's undergoing chemo. He looks the same.

He was visiting a cancer center, BTW. In these pictures from the DM ( ) he's shaking several peoples' hands and exposing himself to germs, so he can't be that frail.

Maybe chemo done. Usually limit exposure during treatments.

Or maybe the tabloid got it wrong. Wound't be the first time.

[Anonymous]

Any news/rumors on who/why leaked that Charles was "very unwell" when he looks just fine, all things considered?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any news/rumors on who/why leaked that Charles was "very unwell" when he looks just fine, all things considered?

Where's the leak?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pancreatic cancer often doesnt present util stage 4. That shit kills you dead. Its brutal.

+1
From my very limited experience with family members of that age, after diagnosis, facing the public would be out of the question

Not so fast. My mother has Stage IV pancreatic and has done very well on chemo and goes out in public all the time. She has lost all her hair, unlike Charles, and at her recent PET the chemo has shrunk all her tumors. Treatment is getting better all the time. Why does Charles still have a full head of hair?

Because that picture is probably from six months ago?

They specifically said it was taken 4/10 and named the photographer. They’re giving all the right info to keep clean from kp’s fumbles.

A friend in the UK had chemo after a whipple procedure for pancreatic cancer and it was a kind that didn't affect her hair. She's still living 7 years later with no evidence of cancer.

It probably wasn't chemo and was immunotherapy or radiation. But again we have no idea what he has or what his treatment is but it doesn't appear to be chemo becuase of the hair situation.

My friend just went through 5 rounds. She wore this ice pack thing on her head the whole time. It was $$$. It’s not that she’s vain but more that it was depressing to her to lose her hair too on top of everything else. Her hair is still thick and long so I must have worked.

+1. Also have a friend who did the ice pack procedure and kept her hair. It was fine and short but hair is important to self-esteem.

Unfortunately the ice pack treatment did not work for my sister.

What does that have to do with this thread?

[Anonymous]

Might be a good time to end the whole silly thing

[Anonymous]

They're not going to end it during the next 10-15 years with all these living royals. Perhaps when William gets the throne he'll cut back drastically on how much the BRF works. There is less point to the outings and sponsorships every year, IMO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're not going to end it during the next 10-15 years with all these living royals. Perhaps when William gets the throne he'll cut back drastically on how much the BRF works. There is less point to the outings and sponsorships every year, IMO.

And that's how the royal family ends: with William not caring enough to promote the BRF by getting out to cut those ribbons.

There is a point to those outings and sponsorships. That point is, when the BRF shows it cares, that brings in more donations and volunteers to the charities they support. That's still a very real impact. Also, as the Queen said, if you're not out in the public eye, you don't exist in the public eye.

Charles gets it. But if William can't be bothered to do even that, then you're right, what really is the point of the BRF? (And no, Kate doesn't want him glued to her bedside 24/7, while their kids are at school and staff handle the housework, so miss me with the patronizing drivel about him needing to be there for her 28 out of 30 days in the month.) Will Britain really see a point in a king that lives in luxurious isolation and does maybe 2-6 engagements a month, like William's been doing for the past year, even before Kate's illness?

He will be out more once he needs to be. William and Kate are very popular in the UK. The royal family is too ingrained in the UK culture to be abolished.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/863823/most-liked-members-of-the-royal-family/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charles was out doing stuff today.

Eeek! Looks very frail.

He looks pretty darn good for being "very unwell" in a situation that's "not good". He looks..... the same.

My thoughts too, and this is a guy who's undergoing chemo. He looks the same.

He was visiting a cancer center, BTW. In these pictures from the DM ( ) he's shaking several peoples' hands and exposing himself to germs, so he can't be that frail.

Maybe chemo done. Usually limit exposure during treatments.

Or maybe the tabloid got it wrong. Wound't be the first time.

There's a non-zero chance that these uber fangirl, can't say anything negative about RF, incessant dog-with-a-bone responses, are plants. Almost certainly from the same very few posters - their responses follow very similar patterns and language. I think a tag team because once they identify the thread, their responses come fast and furious, 24 hours a day. Like it's their job. They also ping admin to death to get unkind posts deleted. So, bye.

Wtf are you talking about? Sorry he’s not in his deathbed like the fake headline.

He may be dying and ceased treatment. Not saying this is true but that it is a possibility, not because I am a prophet or have an interest in any of this, it is just thst I have critical thinking skills. The fact that he looks good in a pic doesn't make the article wrong (but of course the article can be wrong)

Well sure, we're all dying, every day. Even you. You might not be here tomorrow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for Charles who stood on the sideline his entire life and had to wait until the age of 73 to ascend the throne. He's had about five seconds as king.

I don’t feel badly for him at all. His mother never wanted him to be king. He’s lucky she didn’t pass it right to William.

You feel bad, not “badly.” Please use correct grammar.

It depends if she feels like she’s gonna throw up then she feels bad for him… But if she feels turmoil in her soul, then she feels badly.

No, if she feels badly it means her sense of touch isn't working very well.

--an editor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charles was out doing stuff today.

Eeek! Looks very frail.

He looks pretty darn good for being "very unwell" in a situation that's "not good". He looks..... the same.

My thoughts too, and this is a guy who's undergoing chemo. He looks the same.

He was visiting a cancer center, BTW. In these pictures from the DM ( ) he's shaking several peoples' hands and exposing himself to germs, so he can't be that frail.

Maybe chemo done. Usually limit exposure during treatments.

Or maybe the tabloid got it wrong. Wound't be the first time.

There's a non-zero chance that these uber fangirl, can't say anything negative about RF, incessant dog-with-a-bone responses, are plants. Almost certainly from the same very few posters - their responses follow very similar patterns and language. I think a tag team because once they identify the thread, their responses come fast and furious, 24 hours a day. Like it's their job. They also ping admin to death to get unkind posts deleted. So, bye.

Wtf are you talking about? Sorry he’s not in his deathbed like the fake headline.

He may be dying and ceased treatment. Not saying this is true but that it is a possibility, not because I am a prophet or have an interest in any of this, it is just thst I have critical thinking skills. The fact that he looks good in a pic doesn't make the article wrong (but of course the article can be wrong)

Well sure, we're all dying, every day. Even you. You might not be here tomorrow.

You didn't negate what I said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charles was out doing stuff today.

Eeek! Looks very frail.

He looks pretty darn good for being "very unwell" in a situation that's "not good". He looks..... the same.

My thoughts too, and this is a guy who's undergoing chemo. He looks the same.

He was visiting a cancer center, BTW. In these pictures from the DM ( ) he's shaking several peoples' hands and exposing himself to germs, so he can't be that frail.

Maybe chemo done. Usually limit exposure during treatments.

Or maybe the tabloid got it wrong. Wound't be the first time.

There's a non-zero chance that these uber fangirl, can't say anything negative about RF, incessant dog-with-a-bone responses, are plants. Almost certainly from the same very few posters - their responses follow very similar patterns and language. I think a tag team because once they identify the thread, their responses come fast and furious, 24 hours a day. Like it's their job. They also ping admin to death to get unkind posts deleted. So, bye.

Wtf are you talking about? Sorry he’s not in his deathbed like the fake headline.

He may be dying and ceased treatment. Not saying this is true but that it is a possibility, not because I am a prophet or have an interest in any of this, it is just thst I have critical thinking skills. The fact that he looks good in a pic doesn't make the article wrong (but of course the article can be wrong)

Well sure, we're all dying, every day. Even you. You might not be here tomorrow.

You didn't negate what I said.

You haven’t proven he’s very unwell and its not good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charles was out doing stuff today.

Eeek! Looks very frail.

He looks pretty darn good for being "very unwell" in a situation that's "not good". He looks..... the same.

My thoughts too, and this is a guy who's undergoing chemo. He looks the same.

He was visiting a cancer center, BTW. In these pictures from the DM ( ) he's shaking several peoples' hands and exposing himself to germs, so he can't be that frail.

Maybe chemo done. Usually limit exposure during treatments.

Or maybe the tabloid got it wrong. Wound't be the first time.

There's a non-zero chance that these uber fangirl, can't say anything negative about RF, incessant dog-with-a-bone responses, are plants. Almost certainly from the same very few posters - their responses follow very similar patterns and language. I think a tag team because once they identify the thread, their responses come fast and furious, 24 hours a day. Like it's their job. They also ping admin to death to get unkind posts deleted. So, bye.

Wtf are you talking about? Sorry he’s not in his deathbed like the fake headline.

He may be dying and ceased treatment. Not saying this is true but that it is a possibility, not because I am a prophet or have an interest in any of this, it is just thst I have critical thinking skills. The fact that he looks good in a pic doesn't make the article wrong (but of course the article can be wrong)

Well sure, we're all dying, every day. Even you. You might not be here tomorrow.

You didn't negate what I said.

You haven’t proven he’s very unwell and its not good.

I didn't say I did. You have not proven he is well. You have not proven the article is wrong. But, he may be well and article may be wrong. But saying ooh look at this pic sew article is wrong is not a logical line of thinking.