Young Men are Becoming More Sexist - It's About Status

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women outlive men by 10 years. The most unfair situation of all and they are still whining about every much smaller discomfort. Men bless their hearts don’t spill their grievances 24-7 like women. Thank God for the stoic character of our male population. They are hero’s

The "stoic character" of our male population is on full display in this thread. My God, they are truly the Real Victims in today's society!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women outlive men by 10 years. The most unfair situation of all and they are still whining about every much smaller discomfort. Men bless their hearts don’t spill their grievances 24-7 like women. Thank God for the stoic character of our male population. They are hero’s

Until there is equality in lifespan I don’t want to waste my limited time listening to the caterwauling of miserable feminists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women outlive men by 10 years. The most unfair situation of all and they are still whining about every much smaller discomfort. Men bless their hearts don’t spill their grievances 24-7 like women. Thank God for the stoic character of our male population. They are hero’s

Until there is equality in lifespan I don’t want to waste my limited time listening to the caterwauling of miserable feminists.

Men take more dumb risks, more likely to abuse their bodies with drugs/alcohol/bad food/tobacco, more likely to own guns and be a victim of gun violence, and are less likely to see a doctor regularly. Of course they have a much shorter life span; men make so many worse choices for themselves compared to women.

I have two young boys. My biggest worry is that they will make impulsive dumb choices while young that ruins their future.

-married high-income man who is trying to make better choices and exercise self-discipline

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women outlive men by 10 years. The most unfair situation of all and they are still whining about every much smaller discomfort. Men bless their hearts don’t spill their grievances 24-7 like women. Thank God for the stoic character of our male population. They are hero’s

Until there is equality in lifespan I don’t want to waste my limited time listening to the caterwauling of miserable feminists.

Stop doing stupid things that get you the Darwin Award, stop smoking and drinking so much and taking drugs and start eating h better. Then you’ll live longer and won’t be so miserable. You’re welcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women outlive men by 10 years. The most unfair situation of all and they are still whining about every much smaller discomfort. Men bless their hearts don’t spill their grievances 24-7 like women. Thank God for the stoic character of our male population. They are hero’s

Until there is equality in lifespan I don’t want to waste my limited time listening to the caterwauling of miserable feminists.

So, so angry about "miserable feminists." That sliver of the population lives rent free in your head. Let it go, make friends of both genders, hang out with them, live longer and happier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

Feminists want equality, except for hard things like national defense. Feminists are ok when things like that are unequal. Feminists are more than happy to let men carry the burden unequally in those cases.

All the feminists I know including me think that if men get drafted, so should women. Sounds like you need to meet some actual feminists, like the PP whose POV you just completely ignored to post your hackneyed and ill-informed comment.

Why don’t feminists enlist in the military? The majority of the military is male personnel. Why don’t more women volunteer for service?

Why don’t more men sign up to be kindergarten teachers? The majority of early childhood teachers are women. Why don’t more men volunteer to educate young kids?

You can't wait for everyone to "go first" to make the change you're seeking. Get fit, get disciplined, and get your rifles, ladies.

That’s right. Be the change you want to see in the world. Women don’t have to teach kindergarten, or wait to be drafted. There are recruiting offices in every community. Recruiters are falling short of necessary quotas, the military needs volunteers.

There is no reason why feminists can’t enlist now, to defend freedom.

Males account for about 85% of the Army.
Women make up only 5% of the enlisted Marine Corps.

If you are a woman posting in this thread, why are you not enlisting?

Why aren’t you?

Already have, deployed to the Middle East. Did basic at Ft. Dix NJ and AIT at Ft Sam Houston.

When will you be enlisting?

Just as soon as you sign up to teach kindergartners all day, boo.

It sounds like you're arguing that there may be some innate gender roles that people naturally assort into.

lol, is that what you have arguing about this entire time, moron?

There is no such thing as gender, only sex stereotypes.

Women can enter the military and do many jobs as well as men. Women are smaller and weaker than men and cannot do some physical jobs as well as men. This is biological reality not gender.

Women can, but the majority choose not to do so. Why is that?

One reason may be because they don’t want to be fighting shoulder to shoulder in high risk situations like combat with men who think they shouldn’t be there and in the kitchen instead.

Women are less capable of fighting in combat. They can't carry the bigger loads. They are far more likely to get injured during combat and rucking between operating areas. They also suffer more from the stress of combat. You'd have to an ideologue to think it's a good idea to put woman into combat given all the data.

Quick story: Years ago, the Army asked its soldiers how the physical fitness test should be changed to better measure combat readiness. Pull-ups were resoundingly recommended. Do you know why pull-ups were never added? Because they found that women are so physically weak that they couldn't train their way to doing even 3, so they couldn't create a meaningful line to measure. I could go on about the jokes about the women who are "Ranger-qualified." For your purposes, know that they didn't actually pass the real standards, they were passed so as to make silly feminists happy by cheapening the credential.

Wait where are we in the argument now?
The evil feminists want to go into combat and ruin the military?
Or
The evil feminists hate America and won’t pull their weight by being in the military.

They can still serve in other roles . Don’t be obtuse . The fact they’re willingly ok with being exempt from selective service while their brothers, sons, husbands and fathers die show most women aren’t willing to admit they don’t want equality. They are ok with gender norms when it’s beneficial

You keep saying that without any data to back it up. I’m a feminist who believes any future draft should include women as well as men. Put people in positions they qualify for. What’s so hard about that? Unfortunately conservatives don’t want that and will never agree to drafting women.

I think making every citizen do some kind of service for a year or two is a great idea. Whether military or something else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

Feminists want equality, except for hard things like national defense. Feminists are ok when things like that are unequal. Feminists are more than happy to let men carry the burden unequally in those cases.

All the feminists I know including me think that if men get drafted, so should women. Sounds like you need to meet some actual feminists, like the PP whose POV you just completely ignored to post your hackneyed and ill-informed comment.

Why don’t feminists enlist in the military? The majority of the military is male personnel. Why don’t more women volunteer for service?

Why don’t more men sign up to be kindergarten teachers? The majority of early childhood teachers are women. Why don’t more men volunteer to educate young kids?

You can't wait for everyone to "go first" to make the change you're seeking. Get fit, get disciplined, and get your rifles, ladies.

That’s right. Be the change you want to see in the world. Women don’t have to teach kindergarten, or wait to be drafted. There are recruiting offices in every community. Recruiters are falling short of necessary quotas, the military needs volunteers.

There is no reason why feminists can’t enlist now, to defend freedom.

Males account for about 85% of the Army.
Women make up only 5% of the enlisted Marine Corps.

If you are a woman posting in this thread, why are you not enlisting?

Why aren’t you?

Already have, deployed to the Middle East. Did basic at Ft. Dix NJ and AIT at Ft Sam Houston.

When will you be enlisting?

Just as soon as you sign up to teach kindergartners all day, boo.

It sounds like you're arguing that there may be some innate gender roles that people naturally assort into.

lol, is that what you have arguing about this entire time, moron?

There is no such thing as gender, only sex stereotypes.

Women can enter the military and do many jobs as well as men. Women are smaller and weaker than men and cannot do some physical jobs as well as men. This is biological reality not gender.

Women can, but the majority choose not to do so. Why is that?

One reason may be because they don’t want to be fighting shoulder to shoulder in high risk situations like combat with men who think they shouldn’t be there and in the kitchen instead.

Women are less capable of fighting in combat. They can't carry the bigger loads. They are far more likely to get injured during combat and rucking between operating areas. They also suffer more from the stress of combat. You'd have to an ideologue to think it's a good idea to put woman into combat given all the data.

Quick story: Years ago, the Army asked its soldiers how the physical fitness test should be changed to better measure combat readiness. Pull-ups were resoundingly recommended. Do you know why pull-ups were never added? Because they found that women are so physically weak that they couldn't train their way to doing even 3, so they couldn't create a meaningful line to measure. I could go on about the jokes about the women who are "Ranger-qualified." For your purposes, know that they didn't actually pass the real standards, they were passed so as to make silly feminists happy by cheapening the credential.

Wait where are we in the argument now?
The evil feminists want to go into combat and ruin the military?
Or
The evil feminists hate America and won’t pull their weight by being in the military.

They can still serve in other roles . Don’t be obtuse . The fact they’re willingly ok with being exempt from selective service while their brothers, sons, husbands and fathers die show most women aren’t willing to admit they don’t want equality. They are ok with gender norms when it’s beneficial

So they won’t be risking their lives because they can’t do combat? Trying to understand what is going to be acceptable for you here, because you seem upset both that women aren’t dying in combat and that they shouldn’t serve in combat.

[Anonymous]

I think this is where evolution does its thing. The men who can't/won't adapt generally are becoming less attractive to women and won't be able to pass on their offspring. Bye!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this is where evolution does its thing. The men who can't/won't adapt generally are becoming less attractive to women and won't be able to pass on their offspring. Bye!

Abortion and covid shots are propelling Muslims into leading the future. Smart on their part. Really bad for feminists . Mother Nature always wins in the end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Great discussion posted on the Atlantic about the trend where it at least seems like young men are becoming more sexist.
https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2024/06/young-men-sexist-feminism-gender/678764/

I think most women have no idea how hard it is to be a young male aged 18-28, when all the females are ignoring you, these days. It's a winner-take-all market for top-10% men, and a loser-lose-all market for the other 90%.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3lypVnJ0HM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great discussion posted on the Atlantic about the trend where it at least seems like young men are becoming more sexist.
https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2024/06/young-men-sexist-feminism-gender/678764/

I think most women have no idea how hard it is to be a young male aged 18-28, when all the females are ignoring you, these days. It's a winner-take-all market for top-10% men, and a loser-lose-all market for the other 90%.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3lypVnJ0HM

No one is entitled to a date, male or female.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great discussion posted on the Atlantic about the trend where it at least seems like young men are becoming more sexist.
https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2024/06/young-men-sexist-feminism-gender/678764/

I think most women have no idea how hard it is to be a young male aged 18-28, when all the females are ignoring you, these days. It's a winner-take-all market for top-10% men, and a loser-lose-all market for the other 90%.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3lypVnJ0HM

Soen your time involved with something othere than dating apps and you might find yourself more interesting and appealing as a date.

[Anonymous]

(this is a follow-on message to my previous one about dating for 18-28 yr olds males).

I am a 62-yr old left-leaning male.

I was struck recently when leaders from three top-10 schools were called to address congress about antisemitism on campus. All 3 college presidents were female. Have females really become THAT successful so they deserve to lead MIT, Harvard, and U-Penn all AT THE SAME TIME? Really? All THREE schools?

This crap is not new. I have been the victim in the past of "reverse discrimination" in the past, when jobs were reserved for "vagina-holders only" when I graduated with a PhD in Engineering and the job market was extremely tight. My female office mate attended a super computing conference, didn't have a paper, didn't have any qualifications, and was invited to interview for a professorship at a school - sight unseen - without even asking! The affirmative action people were chasing women that hard!

We all saw another women interview at our university and she gave a terrible talk and had a terrible thesis ("but she's female and from a higher ranked school so it matters not!") The reverse discrimination was disgusting to females and males alike, and this was way back in the 1980s, no need for more of this crap in the 2010s or 2020s.

[Anonymous]

I guess you didn't watch the youtube with Donnie Deutsch and James Carville?

This whole thread is why Carville said we're gonna lose. Take a hint - stop looking down your nose at someone who doesn't think like you or it's going to cost you dearly in 2024.

[Anonymous]

None of you idiots have watched the video about the imbalance in dataing apps - so your knee-jerk reactions are way offbase!

I'll listen to your opinions when you act responsibly to understand the very valid mathematical analysis in the video, backed up by facts, not emotions!