The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This does not look good.

I consider her the best dressed of the Trump women. That does not mean I like everything or even most things she wears. Just that she does the least horrible job with fashion and doesn't want to look like a blow-up doll like Kim G.

But this? This is a terrible look from the inauguration.

I just noticed that her bronzer also stops on her neck. For a former model, you’d think she would understand blending better.

Her face was not what anyone was paying her for, as a model - we've all seen her modeling pics

A "model."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone get the feeling lately that the posts in this thread are like AI bots having a conversation?

No. Which comments sound like bots?

All of them. Same comments, over and over.
DP

Agree. Comments going no where. Seemingly a new focus on Trump and Musk. This thread is boring if we're talking about Trump's bronzer. We need ugly fashion, STAT.

So why aren't you posting some photos then??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone get the feeling lately that the posts in this thread are like AI bots having a conversation?

No. Which comments sound like bots?

All of them. Same comments, over and over.
DP

Agree. Comments going no where. Seemingly a new focus on Trump and Musk. This thread is boring if we're talking about Trump's bronzer. We need ugly fashion, STAT.

Ivanka isn’t part of this this administration, Melania barely does public appearances, Kimberly Guilfoyle got the boot, they’ve all been keeping a low profile since the inauguration…how do you propose we conjure up fashion mishaps?

This administration is all about the bros. They'll use women in subservient roles like Karoline Leavitt as press secretary, or throwing Linda McMahon in at Education (literally saying that they hope she put herself out of a job by closing down the department, that's how valued that role is).

The lack of female presence in this administration, even compared to Trump's first administration, is telling. Combined with their obsession with DEI. It's very intentional. Obviously the fact that it means no outfits to critique is not important. But it's like a canary in a coal mine -- it makes you realize how devoid of women this administration is, and given their rhetoric and policies, it tells you a lot about them.

And that is why we have to discuss the men. They've sent the women to Greece, a Miami island, etc.

There's no reason that men's fashion, or lack of, can't be discussed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This does not look good.

I consider her the best dressed of the Trump women. That does not mean I like everything or even most things she wears. Just that she does the least horrible job with fashion and doesn't want to look like a blow-up doll like Kim G.

But this? This is a terrible look from the inauguration.

I think what makes it look bad is that she looks too severe with none of her hair showing.

She looks a bit like Jim Carrey in The Mask.

You're right!!

[Anonymous]

Isn’t Musk the real First Lady in this story? He is fair game.

I really hope that his clone kids revolt against him one day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This does not look good.

I consider her the best dressed of the Trump women. That does not mean I like everything or even most things she wears. Just that she does the least horrible job with fashion and doesn't want to look like a blow-up doll like Kim G.

But this? This is a terrible look from the inauguration.

I think what makes it look bad is that she looks too severe with none of her hair showing.

She looks a bit like Jim Carrey in The Mask.

Ha ha. True.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone get the feeling lately that the posts in this thread are like AI bots having a conversation?

No. Which comments sound like bots?

All of them. Same comments, over and over.
DP

Agree. Comments going no where. Seemingly a new focus on Trump and Musk. This thread is boring if we're talking about Trump's bronzer. We need ugly fashion, STAT.

Ivanka isn’t part of this this administration, Melania barely does public appearances, Kimberly Guilfoyle got the boot, they’ve all been keeping a low profile since the inauguration…how do you propose we conjure up fashion mishaps?

This administration is all about the bros. They'll use women in subservient roles like Karoline Leavitt as press secretary, or throwing Linda McMahon in at Education (literally saying that they hope she put herself out of a job by closing down the department, that's how valued that role is).

The lack of female presence in this administration, even compared to Trump's first administration, is telling. Combined with their obsession with DEI. It's very intentional. Obviously the fact that it means no outfits to critique is not important. But it's like a canary in a coal mine -- it makes you realize how devoid of women this administration is, and given their rhetoric and policies, it tells you a lot about them.

This actually made me laugh out loud. So, press secretary is - in your words - a "subservient role"? Poor Jen Psaki and Karine Jean-Pierre! Not to mention, the many men who have been press secretaries in the past. His CHIEF OF STAFF, Susie Wiles, is the first woman to ever hold that position.

Trump has plenty of women in his cabinet, all of whom you studiously ignore. Kristi Noem, Pam Bondi, Tulsi Gabbard, Brooke Rollins, Linda McMahon. Honestly, you just sound stupid making these absurd and false claims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone get the feeling lately that the posts in this thread are like AI bots having a conversation?

No. Which comments sound like bots?

All of them. Same comments, over and over.
DP

Agree. Comments going no where. Seemingly a new focus on Trump and Musk. This thread is boring if we're talking about Trump's bronzer. We need ugly fashion, STAT.

Ivanka isn’t part of this this administration, Melania barely does public appearances, Kimberly Guilfoyle got the boot, they’ve all been keeping a low profile since the inauguration…how do you propose we conjure up fashion mishaps?

This administration is all about the bros. They'll use women in subservient roles like Karoline Leavitt as press secretary, or throwing Linda McMahon in at Education (literally saying that they hope she put herself out of a job by closing down the department, that's how valued that role is).

The lack of female presence in this administration, even compared to Trump's first administration, is telling. Combined with their obsession with DEI. It's very intentional. Obviously the fact that it means no outfits to critique is not important. But it's like a canary in a coal mine -- it makes you realize how devoid of women this administration is, and given their rhetoric and policies, it tells you a lot about them.

And that is why we have to discuss the men. They've sent the women to Greece, a Miami island, etc.

There's no reason that men's fashion, or lack of, can't be discussed.

Knock yourself out. No one is interested in discussing men's "fashion." How boring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This does not look good.

I consider her the best dressed of the Trump women. That does not mean I like everything or even most things she wears. Just that she does the least horrible job with fashion and doesn't want to look like a blow-up doll like Kim G.

But this? This is a terrible look from the inauguration.

I think what makes it look bad is that she looks too severe with none of her hair showing.

She looks a bit like Jim Carrey in The Mask.

Oh PPs, you nailed it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone get the feeling lately that the posts in this thread are like AI bots having a conversation?

No. Which comments sound like bots?

All of them. Same comments, over and over.
DP

Agree. Comments going no where. Seemingly a new focus on Trump and Musk. This thread is boring if we're talking about Trump's bronzer. We need ugly fashion, STAT.

Ivanka isn’t part of this this administration, Melania barely does public appearances, Kimberly Guilfoyle got the boot, they’ve all been keeping a low profile since the inauguration…how do you propose we conjure up fashion mishaps?

This administration is all about the bros. They'll use women in subservient roles like Karoline Leavitt as press secretary, or throwing Linda McMahon in at Education (literally saying that they hope she put herself out of a job by closing down the department, that's how valued that role is).

The lack of female presence in this administration, even compared to Trump's first administration, is telling. Combined with their obsession with DEI. It's very intentional. Obviously the fact that it means no outfits to critique is not important. But it's like a canary in a coal mine -- it makes you realize how devoid of women this administration is, and given their rhetoric and policies, it tells you a lot about them.

And that is why we have to discuss the men. They've sent the women to Greece, a Miami island, etc.

There's no reason that men's fashion, or lack of, can't be discussed.

Knock yourself out. No one is interested in discussing men's "fashion." How boring.

You still haven't posted a photo of any fashion. That's what's boring.

[Anonymous]

From last week:

[Anonymous]

This woman mastered the '80s look. May she RIP.

[Anonymous]

Found this one on a parody twitter feed and obvs it's altered but do we still pose like this when we are middle aged?

[Anonymous]

Have we talked about JD Vance's short pants?



Last year...

[Anonymous]

He needs some sock garders. I picked some out for him: