2030 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Agree. There were great games all around. No one team was dominant this weekend. It’s going to be an exciting year of lacrosse.

[Anonymous]

heros 2030 white - why did so many leave after the summer?

[Anonymous]

so Eaglesticks had a strong weekend. Not overrated. All these teams are evening out

[Anonymous]

The contrast will likely increase as the year progresses, but right now, the past three weeks have shown of that these teams are all within a goal or two of each other
M&D, MDU, EagleStix, Jesters, NXT, BLC, Heros.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:heros 2030 white - why did so many leave after the summer?

Thought they should be on green; one of those was a kid who had been on green and was moved down. Along with her coach father. Several went to Coppermine West Black and a few to MDU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The contrast will likely increase as the year progresses, but right now, the past three weeks have shown of that these teams are all within a goal or two of each other
M&D, MDU, EagleStix, Jesters, NXT, BLC, Heros.

Coppermine feeling the loss of some players switching teams. Outside of the Eagle Stix victory, they have lost to all the top teams they played.

[Anonymous]

A one goal loss to MDU and Heros does not seem like Coppermine is too far off from where they were last year.

[Anonymous]

I guess EagleStix wasn't over-rated after all.

[Anonymous]

When do the first rankings come out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When do the first rankings come out?

From the site - In general, the algorithm starts producing accurately as teams start getting 10+ games under their belts. It only continues to get more accurate as more games are entered into the system. More data = better rankings. The algorithm is extremely accurate computing an objective average performance rating for all teams based on the game results in the system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When do the first rankings come out?

From the site - In general, the algorithm starts producing accurately as teams start getting 10+ games under their belts. It only continues to get more accurate as more games are entered into the system. More data = better rankings. The algorithm is extremely accurate computing an objective average performance rating for all teams based on the game results in the system.

Some teams already have played 9 or 10 games.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When do the first rankings come out?

From the site - In general, the algorithm starts producing accurately as teams start getting 10+ games under their belts. It only continues to get more accurate as more games are entered into the system. More data = better rankings. The algorithm is extremely accurate computing an objective average performance rating for all teams based on the game results in the system.

Do all teams have to reach 10 games?

Some teams already have played 9 or 10 games.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The contrast will likely increase as the year progresses, but right now, the past three weeks have shown of that these teams are all within a goal or two of each other
M&D, MDU, EagleStix, Jesters, NXT, BLC, Heros.

Coppermine feeling the loss of some players switching teams. Outside of the Eagle Stix victory, they have lost to all the top teams they played.

They were robbed of that MDU game. Some weird complaints of the girl doing the draw and her stick which were proven to be false.

[Anonymous]

i thought Coppermine looked stronger and more steady so far. Even with the loss of some players. They beat Eagle sticks and lost to Heros and MD United each by one. They looked great

[Anonymous]

It does seem like the teams are getting closer as the girls get older.