Kris Jenner’s birthday party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

That she makes everything about “me”? Like how did Kris Jenner’s birthday party become all about Meghan?

It became all about Meghan because those of you who hate her to the point of coming up with dumb nicknames for her hyperfixate on every little thing she does.

There are just public people out there that the public hates. For Meghan I think it’s because she outs so much effort into trying to seem important, relevant, and deep, but it often comes across as lacking real substance. Oh, and the whining and playing the victim - this goes for Harry too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

That she makes everything about “me”? Like how did Kris Jenner’s birthday party become all about Meghan?

It became all about Meghan because those of you who hate her to the point of coming up with dumb nicknames for her hyperfixate on every little thing she does.

There are just public people out there that the public hates. For Meghan I think it’s because she outs so much effort into trying to seem important, relevant, and deep, but it often comes across as lacking real substance. Oh, and the whining and playing the victim - this goes for Harry too.

No, be honest, it's because you're simping for the royal family and she didn't adequately kiss "Catherine's" ass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

That she makes everything about “me”? Like how did Kris Jenner’s birthday party become all about Meghan?

It became all about Meghan because those of you who hate her to the point of coming up with dumb nicknames for her hyperfixate on every little thing she does.

There are just public people out there that the public hates. For Meghan I think it’s because she outs so much effort into trying to seem important, relevant, and deep, but it often comes across as lacking real substance. Oh, and the whining and playing the victim - this goes for Harry too.

No, be honest, it's because you're simping for the royal family and she didn't adequately kiss "Catherine's" ass.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well according to People, Meghan & Harry checked "No" on the consent form for their photographs to be shared. This was somehow overlooked by Kris Jenner's team and that's why the photos were removed.

But they did take pictures, since they are clearly posing in some of the released pics. It doesn't make much sense.

No it makes perfect sense. They said pics could be taken just not posted. The consent was for photo release not photography altogether

So taken for what purpose exactly?

Do you only take pics to share on social media?

They probably didn’t care about getting pics with Kris and other friends at the party. I’m sure they said no to photos being posted bc you people freak out if they go outside.

These people live their entire lives in the public eye. If you're that worried about it, you don't go the their party. It's not like they just went there to have a good time.

Celebrities are allowed to go out without it being all over the news, Karen.

Um. Is it the um “media” at fault here? How do Lauren Sanchez and Oprah and Bill Gates and Adele manage to not come out of this looking like a smacked ass, but the uh “royal” idiots can’t manage?

+1. The Megan haters are out in force here. I’m still grossed out that Jeff Bezos held this super luxe party for a D list momager, while Amazon treats its delivery people like crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

That she makes everything about “me”? Like how did Kris Jenner’s birthday party become all about Meghan?

It became all about Meghan because those of you who hate her to the point of coming up with dumb nicknames for her hyperfixate on every little thing she does.

There are just public people out there that the public hates. For Meghan I think it’s because she outs so much effort into trying to seem important, relevant, and deep, but it often comes across as lacking real substance. Oh, and the whining and playing the victim - this goes for Harry too.

No, be honest, it's because you're simping for the royal family and she didn't adequately kiss "Catherine's" ass.

Nope. I don't admire anyone who publicly shames his/her family. I wouldn't trust her for a second.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well according to People, Meghan & Harry checked "No" on the consent form for their photographs to be shared. This was somehow overlooked by Kris Jenner's team and that's why the photos were removed.

But they did take pictures, since they are clearly posing in some of the released pics. It doesn't make much sense.

No it makes perfect sense. They said pics could be taken just not posted. The consent was for photo release not photography altogether

So taken for what purpose exactly?

Do you only take pics to share on social media?

They probably didn’t care about getting pics with Kris and other friends at the party. I’m sure they said no to photos being posted bc you people freak out if they go outside.

These people live their entire lives in the public eye. If you're that worried about it, you don't go the their party. It's not like they just went there to have a good time.

Celebrities are allowed to go out without it being all over the news, Karen.

Um. Is it the um “media” at fault here? How do Lauren Sanchez and Oprah and Bill Gates and Adele manage to not come out of this looking like a smacked ass, but the uh “royal” idiots can’t manage?

+1. The Megan haters are out in force here. I’m still grossed out that Jeff Bezos held this super luxe party for a D list momager, while Amazon treats its delivery people like crap.

No one is forced to work for Amazon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

That she makes everything about “me”? Like how did Kris Jenner’s birthday party become all about Meghan?

It became all about Meghan because those of you who hate her to the point of coming up with dumb nicknames for her hyperfixate on every little thing she does.

There are just public people out there that the public hates. For Meghan I think it’s because she outs so much effort into trying to seem important, relevant, and deep, but it often comes across as lacking real substance. Oh, and the whining and playing the victim - this goes for Harry too.

No, be honest, it's because you're simping for the royal family and she didn't adequately kiss "Catherine's" ass.

Nope. I don't admire anyone who publicly shames his/her family. I wouldn't trust her for a second.

You sound like the type of person whose kids are no longer in contact with you. Does this all just hit too close to home? Is that why you feel so strongly about someone who has likely never thought about you at all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

Me… she’s narcissistic, self-centered, selfish, scheming, a pick-me girl. It’s all about her. She made Kris’s party all about her. She loves this. Everything she touches she ruins and stokes drama and negative vibes. She’s a talentless train wreck.

I don't think she's talentless. I do think she plays the victim card way too often. We all have challenges in our lives; no one relates to complainers or has the energy for incessant, self-absorbed whiners.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

That she makes everything about “me”? Like how did Kris Jenner’s birthday party become all about Meghan?

It became all about Meghan because those of you who hate her to the point of coming up with dumb nicknames for her hyperfixate on every little thing she does.

There are just public people out there that the public hates. For Meghan I think it’s because she outs so much effort into trying to seem important, relevant, and deep, but it often comes across as lacking real substance. Oh, and the whining and playing the victim - this goes for Harry too.

No, be honest, it's because you're simping for the royal family and she didn't adequately kiss "Catherine's" ass.

Nope. I don't admire anyone who publicly shames his/her family. I wouldn't trust her for a second.

You sound like the type of person whose kids are no longer in contact with you. Does this all just hit too close to home? Is that why you feel so strongly about someone who has likely never thought about you at all?

Our family members love each other, get along very well and get together often. We encourage and support each other. Hope yours do, too!

[Anonymous]

This thread is going to keep going until her 71st birthday party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

That she makes everything about “me”? Like how did Kris Jenner’s birthday party become all about Meghan?

It became all about Meghan because those of you who hate her to the point of coming up with dumb nicknames for her hyperfixate on every little thing she does.

There are just public people out there that the public hates. For Meghan I think it’s because she outs so much effort into trying to seem important, relevant, and deep, but it often comes across as lacking real substance. Oh, and the whining and playing the victim - this goes for Harry too.

No, be honest, it's because you're simping for the royal family and she didn't adequately kiss "Catherine's" ass.

Personally I think Meghan, Harry, Kate, and William are all a bunch of useless leeches. A pair of inbred baldy brothers and their social climbing anorexic wives who have no purpose in life but to strive to make the public adore them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well according to People, Meghan & Harry checked "No" on the consent form for their photographs to be shared. This was somehow overlooked by Kris Jenner's team and that's why the photos were removed.

But they did take pictures, since they are clearly posing in some of the released pics. It doesn't make much sense.

No it makes perfect sense. They said pics could be taken just not posted. The consent was for photo release not photography altogether

So taken for what purpose exactly?

Do you only take pics to share on social media?

They probably didn’t care about getting pics with Kris and other friends at the party. I’m sure they said no to photos being posted bc you people freak out if they go outside.

These people live their entire lives in the public eye. If you're that worried about it, you don't go the their party. It's not like they just went there to have a good time.

Celebrities are allowed to go out without it being all over the news, Karen.

Um. Is it the um “media” at fault here? How do Lauren Sanchez and Oprah and Bill Gates and Adele manage to not come out of this looking like a smacked ass, but the uh “royal” idiots can’t manage?

+1. The Megan haters are out in force here. I’m still grossed out that Jeff Bezos held this super luxe party for a D list momager, while Amazon treats its delivery people like crap.

Why are you in a thread about the birthday party of someone you consider "a D list momager"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

Me… she’s narcissistic, self-centered, selfish, scheming, a pick-me girl. It’s all about her. She made Kris’s party all about her. She loves this. Everything she touches she ruins and stokes drama and negative vibes. She’s a talentless train wreck.

WTF is wrong with you Kate fans. You realize Kate and Meghan can inhabit their own spheres, and you don't need to tear down one to pump up the other, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

Me… she’s narcissistic, self-centered, selfish, scheming, a pick-me girl. It’s all about her. She made Kris’s party all about her. She loves this. Everything she touches she ruins and stokes drama and negative vibes. She’s a talentless train wreck.

I don't think she's talentless. I do think she plays the victim card way too often. We all have challenges in our lives; no one relates to complainers or has the energy for incessant, self-absorbed whiners.

Meghan hasn't mentioned the royal family in 2-3 years. You people don't even know her, but you have a narrative in your heads, fed to you by the British tabloids, that's nasty and probably untrue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice there is ALWAYS drama with Me-gan. She's a classic drama-setting succubus. The A-listers and Hollywood fat cat executives need to remind Me-gan & Harry where they stand in the pecking order and ice them out of all future invites. And I suspect they will do just that.

Why are you hyphenating her first name lol

I was about to post the same thing but then I realized it’s probably like…”ME!”-gan

Oh, got it. PP, that’s not even a funny nickname. Word of advice, look to Trump for inspo. He’s odious but at least his rude nicknames for ppl are funny.

Nicknames can be considered appropriate based on one's behavior, even if not humorous.

Sure, but what does "Me-Gan" have to do with Meghan's behavior? I truly don't get it. Like at all.

Me… she’s narcissistic, self-centered, selfish, scheming, a pick-me girl. It’s all about her. She made Kris’s party all about her. She loves this. Everything she touches she ruins and stokes drama and negative vibes. She’s a talentless train wreck.

So if you're going to try to derail this thread into a Meghan hate-fest, can we at least talk about Kate's wigs and zero work ethic?