Tysons Corner Casino -- Foregone Conclusion Now?

[Anonymous]

Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

Wow, so now that the party that supports the casino has been elected you are going to lobby them to stop the casino.

Really think that is going to work?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

Wow, so now that the party that supports the casino has been elected you are going to lobby them to stop the casino.

Really think that is going to work?

Absolutely no one made their selection on the primary basis of a casino. That’s not what this election was about. And if we get a casino, let’s just take the money from the yokels who decide to show up and waste theirs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

Wow, so now that the party that supports the casino has been elected you are going to lobby them to stop the casino.

Really think that is going to work?

Absolutely no one made their selection on the primary basis of a casino. That’s not what this election was about. And if we get a casino, let’s just take the money from the yokels who decide to show up and waste theirs.

It's an entirely D initiative, from the politicians who support it to the likely lower income customers who will patronize it. More tax revenue for the politicians, more hopes of money for nothing by the suckers who patronize it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

Wow, so now that the party that supports the casino has been elected you are going to lobby them to stop the casino.

Really think that is going to work?

Absolutely no one made their selection on the primary basis of a casino. That’s not what this election was about. And if we get a casino, let’s just take the money from the yokels who decide to show up and waste theirs.

It's an entirely D initiative, from the politicians who support it to the likely lower income customers who will patronize it. More tax revenue for the politicians, more hopes of money for nothing by the suckers who patronize it.

Any Tysons casino would be high-end, going after the wealthy bettors, and attached to a fancy hotel/entertainment venue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

Wow, so now that the party that supports the casino has been elected you are going to lobby them to stop the casino.

Really think that is going to work?

Absolutely no one made their selection on the primary basis of a casino. That’s not what this election was about. And if we get a casino, let’s just take the money from the yokels who decide to show up and waste theirs.

That's just how democracy works. You vote for issue A, but its bundled with B which no-one talked about. Enjoy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

Wow, so now that the party that supports the casino has been elected you are going to lobby them to stop the casino.

Really think that is going to work?

Absolutely no one made their selection on the primary basis of a casino. That’s not what this election was about. And if we get a casino, let’s just take the money from the yokels who decide to show up and waste theirs.

It's an entirely D initiative, from the politicians who support it to the likely lower income customers who will patronize it. More tax revenue for the politicians, more hopes of money for nothing by the suckers who patronize it.

Any Tysons casino would be high-end, going after the wealthy bettors, and attached to a fancy hotel/entertainment venue.

Every casino ever built had that same vision. The wealthy high end bettors don't go to casinos. they don't use gambling apps etc. The casinos are full of people who think they are going to make it. Look at what MGM has become, Atlantic City had huge dreams to be what you describe and have you been to las vegas lately?

[Anonymous]

Did either candidate ever come out directly for or against the casino?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

Wow, so now that the party that supports the casino has been elected you are going to lobby them to stop the casino.

Really think that is going to work?

Absolutely no one made their selection on the primary basis of a casino. That’s not what this election was about. And if we get a casino, let’s just take the money from the yokels who decide to show up and waste theirs.

It's an entirely D initiative, from the politicians who support it to the likely lower income customers who will patronize it. More tax revenue for the politicians, more hopes of money for nothing by the suckers who patronize it.

Any Tysons casino would be high-end, going after the wealthy bettors, and attached to a fancy hotel/entertainment venue.

Every casino ever built had that same vision. The wealthy high end bettors don't go to casinos. they don't use gambling apps etc. The casinos are full of people who think they are going to make it. Look at what MGM has become, Atlantic City had huge dreams to be what you describe and have you been to las vegas lately?

Because they go to Vegas and not boring Tysons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

Wow, so now that the party that supports the casino has been elected you are going to lobby them to stop the casino.

Really think that is going to work?

Absolutely no one made their selection on the primary basis of a casino. That’s not what this election was about. And if we get a casino, let’s just take the money from the yokels who decide to show up and waste theirs.

It's an entirely D initiative, from the politicians who support it to the likely lower income customers who will patronize it. More tax revenue for the politicians, more hopes of money for nothing by the suckers who patronize it.

Any Tysons casino would be high-end, going after the wealthy bettors, and attached to a fancy hotel/entertainment venue.

Every casino ever built had that same vision. The wealthy high end bettors don't go to casinos. they don't use gambling apps etc. The casinos are full of people who think they are going to make it. Look at what MGM has become, Atlantic City had huge dreams to be what you describe and have you been to las vegas lately?

Because they go to Vegas and not boring Tysons.

Vegas is dead. The whole concept of “gambling as fun” is just not sustainable when people barely have enough money to eat. It’s desperation. The real whales can gamble for profit in the stock market.

[Anonymous]

You guys are so stupid!

You vote for the candidates that support the casino project and then are going to ask them to kill the project???? WTH????


This is why uneducated people should not vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did either candidate ever come out directly for or against the casino?

Yeah, did Spanberger say she supports the casino? I never heard but who knows. It's wildly unpopular here, and I doubt she would want to do anything to harm her reputation or appeal. This could be her Chap Peterson type of defining moment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did either candidate ever come out directly for or against the casino?

Yeah, did Spanberger say she supports the casino? I never heard but who knows. It's wildly unpopular here, and I doubt she would want to do anything to harm her reputation or appeal. This could be her Chap Peterson type of defining moment.

Hashmi took money from the casino operators but if the end result is a referendum in Fairfax it seems unlikely to pass. And it's wildly unpopular among most local Democratic politicians in NoVa apart from slimy Scott Surovell and a few others like dopey Stella Pekarsky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now that weve defeated maga in VA, we turn some of that energy on Spanberger and co to make sure this Democratic Party casino project doesn’t happen in Tyson’s?

So, you admit, the casino is being pushed by Democrats? Yet, you voted for them? Not too bright, are you?

[Anonymous]

Its being pushed by Scott but he wasn't giving up his position and both governor candidates took money from Comstock so it wasnt really easy to tell who would be against it or not. I think most Fairfax county residents just want a referendum to vote themselves like they did in Richmond. Its possible that will be an option still.