Young Men are Becoming More Sexist - It's About Status

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the joint chiefs 50/50 male /female?
Is 50% of the military leadership female?
If they could show a specific timeline of women engaging in equal leadership and decision making, I would be supportive of girls becoming eligible for the draft.
I’d also need to see that reflected in congress as well.

There plenty of women in these roles in Europe.

Your point appears to be that there are few women in leadership roles, therefore, we should not elect/appoint/promote women to leadership roles.

Can’t argue with that logic.

No. That wasn’t my point.
Enlistment would be a good path for someone of your intellect.

Left also hates enlisted people. Noted.

Just pointing out your options. You aren’t bright enough to teach kindergarten. Digging ditches would be a good possibility .

https://stephenporter.org/iq-by-college-major/

Early childhood education and elementary education are very low on the ranking of average iq by major. You have a nasty and arrogant personality to boot.

So why can’t men hack it?

Hack what? Aren’t most college professors male?

Elementary and High School teachers are mostly women, the majority of college professors are male. What does that tell you?

Are you interested? Here’s an article

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/diversity-equity/2023/10/24/workplace-climate-pushing-women-out-professoriate

But 44% of tenured positions are women.
That’s significant consider the headwinds women face in academia.

No, not interested. I can see that most professors, doctors, surgeons, specialty doctors, are male.

Boys and men are changing their gender and becoming women and winning girls and womens sporting events and championships, they are competing in beauty pageants and winning titles and scholarships. Trans women are beating women at darts, weightlifting, running, swimming. Trans women are better women than women are women.

Hahaha. I bet you’re a great woman!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the joint chiefs 50/50 male /female?
Is 50% of the military leadership female?
If they could show a specific timeline of women engaging in equal leadership and decision making, I would be supportive of girls becoming eligible for the draft.
I’d also need to see that reflected in congress as well.

There plenty of women in these roles in Europe.

Your point appears to be that there are few women in leadership roles, therefore, we should not elect/appoint/promote women to leadership roles.

Can’t argue with that logic.

No. That wasn’t my point.
Enlistment would be a good path for someone of your intellect.

Left also hates enlisted people. Noted.

Just pointing out your options. You aren’t bright enough to teach kindergarten. Digging ditches would be a good possibility .

Education majors have the lowest iqs and test scores. You really need to take a seat.

And yet men can’t make it through college courses to met the requirements.

Many male military members use their GI bill after they leave the service to obtain their degree.

Yeah but not equal to the ladies, right ? They aren’t able to get a degree at the same rate as women.

Most doctors are men, surgeons, men.

Most engineers (all types) men.

Most mathematicians, men.

Most tech people, all types, men.

Surgeons?
I’ve read conflicting stats on that.
But here’s an article re: women surgeons have better results. We really need more of them.

https://www.wsj.com/health/wellness/female-surgeons-get-better-results-than-male-counterparts-7ba9b9c2

Female surgeons perform less complicated and risky surgical procedures. Of course their patients have fewer complications.

The majority of women don’t have the physical strength to perform orthopedic surgeries, that’s a given.

Oh it’s cause women do easy surgery! Of course!
I’m reminded of the saying “ Minor surgery, is surgery someone else is having.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the joint chiefs 50/50 male /female?
Is 50% of the military leadership female?
If they could show a specific timeline of women engaging in equal leadership and decision making, I would be supportive of girls becoming eligible for the draft.
I’d also need to see that reflected in congress as well.

There plenty of women in these roles in Europe.

Your point appears to be that there are few women in leadership roles, therefore, we should not elect/appoint/promote women to leadership roles.

Can’t argue with that logic.

No. That wasn’t my point.
Enlistment would be a good path for someone of your intellect.

Left also hates enlisted people. Noted.

Just pointing out your options. You aren’t bright enough to teach kindergarten. Digging ditches would be a good possibility .

https://stephenporter.org/iq-by-college-major/

Early childhood education and elementary education are very low on the ranking of average iq by major. You have a nasty and arrogant personality to boot.

So why can’t men hack it?

Hack what? Aren’t most college professors male?

Elementary and High School teachers are mostly women, the majority of college professors are male. What does that tell you?

Are you interested? Here’s an article

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/diversity-equity/2023/10/24/workplace-climate-pushing-women-out-professoriate

But 44% of tenured positions are women.
That’s significant consider the headwinds women face in academia.

No, not interested. I can see that most professors, doctors, surgeons, specialty doctors, are male.

Boys and men are changing their gender and becoming women and winning girls and womens sporting events and championships, they are competing in beauty pageants and winning titles and scholarships. Trans women are beating women at darts, weightlifting, running, swimming. Trans women are better women than women are women.

Hahaha. I bet you’re a great woman!

What is a wöman? Are you a biologist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, it is young republican men.

Don't forget, in the eyes of the GOP, liberal men aren't real men.

Liberal men are the same as conservative men. Liberal men pretend that are different but in reality they are still men.

+1. Conservative men are usually upfront about their traditional beliefs. Liberal men claim to be feminists and then walk around calling women “front holes” and demanding that they be imprisoned with men.

LOL. I posted the study. I hardly think saying you want trad roles because you’re threatened by women and this will ever change is hardly reassuring. While I wish that wasn’t true if Dems, at least they vote for a party that has more women (even if not voting for them), and better protects women.

You do a lot of assuming.

As a radical feminist I do not believe in traditional gender roles.

You must not believe in evolution either. Men and women evolved to different things because that's what Mother Nature intended. The fact is women were happier in 1970 before feminism destroyed traditional roles.

[b]Feminists have always been funny because they want all the rights without the responsibilities. I remember a feminist economics class where every female student complained about the institution of marriage. In particular, they resented the idea of taking their husband's name. Of course, not a single one complained about getting a diamond ring and all were just fine with keeping their father's name.

Men are becoming sexist because the system disfavors them. They'd be insane to want more of the same.

Of all the things that didn’t happen, this didn’t happen the most. Posted by an incel or a whiny “boy mom”?
Which do we think?

One book that was prominently studied in that class was Kidding Ourselves by Rhona Mahoney. The book was an intellectually honest attempt to discuss the topic of feminist economic incentives; however, it suffered from poor assumptions that women did not have a feminine nature caused by DNA. That alone has been proven false by brain scans showing how women's brains operate differently than man's.

The fact that you resort immediately to trite name calling demonstrates you have no faith in your argument. I, however, have posted the book that was being discussed the day the conversation erupted. We all know that I didn't just pull a random mid-90s feminist book out of the woodwork, so please use good faith here and apologize.

I’m rather tell you to F off and die.
I mean I won’t. That’s awfully aggressive and being of the weaker sex, I just wouldn’t do that.

You respond again with emotion and not substance. You would be happier in a domain better suited to your God-given talents, which do not include analyzing the externalities of dividing labor along gender lines.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, it is young republican men.

Don't forget, in the eyes of the GOP, liberal men aren't real men.

Liberal men are the same as conservative men. Liberal men pretend that are different but in reality they are still men.

+1. Conservative men are usually upfront about their traditional beliefs. Liberal men claim to be feminists and then walk around calling women “front holes” and demanding that they be imprisoned with men.

LOL. I posted the study. I hardly think saying you want trad roles because you’re threatened by women and this will ever change is hardly reassuring. While I wish that wasn’t true if Dems, at least they vote for a party that has more women (even if not voting for them), and better protects women.

You do a lot of assuming.

As a radical feminist I do not believe in traditional gender roles.

You must not believe in evolution either. Men and women evolved to different things because that's what Mother Nature intended. The fact is women were happier in 1970 before feminism destroyed traditional roles.

[b]Feminists have always been funny because they want all the rights without the responsibilities. I remember a feminist economics class where every female student complained about the institution of marriage. In particular, they resented the idea of taking their husband's name. Of course, not a single one complained about getting a diamond ring and all were just fine with keeping their father's name.

Men are becoming sexist because the system disfavors them. They'd be insane to want more of the same.

Of all the things that didn’t happen, this didn’t happen the most. Posted by an incel or a whiny “boy mom”?
Which do we think?

One book that was prominently studied in that class was Kidding Ourselves by Rhona Mahoney. The book was an intellectually honest attempt to discuss the topic of feminist economic incentives; however, it suffered from poor assumptions that women did not have a feminine nature caused by DNA. That alone has been proven false by brain scans showing how women's brains operate differently than man's.

The fact that you resort immediately to trite name calling demonstrates you have no faith in your argument. I, however, have posted the book that was being discussed the day the conversation erupted. We all know that I didn't just pull a random mid-90s feminist book out of the woodwork, so please use good faith here and apologize.

I’m rather tell you to F off and die.
I mean I won’t. That’s awfully aggressive and being of the weaker sex, I just wouldn’t do that.

You respond again with emotion and not substance. You would be happier in a domain better suited to your God-given talents, which do not include analyzing the externalities of dividing labor along gender lines.

And you should go back to writing more fiction! Tell us more about all of the real world experience you have with real live feminist women. You tell a great tale!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

Feminists want equality, except for hard things like national defense. Feminists are ok when things like that are unequal. Feminists are more than happy to let men carry the burden unequally in those cases.

What an idiotic post.

Men want equality except for hard things like taking care of children and not committing violent crimes. Men are ok when things like that are unequal. Men are more than happy to let women carry the burden unequally in those cases.

Men don't want equality--that's a feminist's term. Men want men to be men and women to be women. Each sex has a slate of tasks to which it is naturally better suited. Whether the burden is carried equally is a matter of opinion. In fairness to the women, men used to have a significant risk they'd go to war and die. Without that, the old system isn't necessarily "fair."

Stupid. You want to create rigid generalizations and force everyone into them. Treat people as individuals. There are men who are "better suited" to child rearing and women who are not. There are women who are "better suited" to being the breadwinners in a family and men who are not. Stop trying to suffocate people with your rigid beliefs in there only being one way for each gender to live their life. I don't want the slate of tasks you are trying to force on me. It's called freedom and liberty and that is the American way, for us each to choose our own destiny.

Also the reason men have had to go to war and die is because men start wars. Stop starting wars and that won't be the case anymore. Easy peasy.

We are talking policy. Making policy based on exceptions would be horribly inefficient. In a liberal world, we were supposed to make room for the exceptions you describe. Unfortunately, most people are too dumb to understand exceptions and can only only handle simple rules. See, e.g., military structures employed since the Prussians.

We don't have freedom any more in the US. I can't freely associate because that would hurt the feelings of people who are different.

You're right about men starting wars, but women are proving to be warmongers themselves. It's almost like power is the reason people start wars. If you want fewer wars, you should support a reduction in the power of the government. But if you're a woman, it's highly unlikely you'd support such a position.

[Anonymous]

Based on what's on display in this thread, the article was right. Men are super resentful of women and are getting worse about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

Feminists want equality, except for hard things like national defense. Feminists are ok when things like that are unequal. Feminists are more than happy to let men carry the burden unequally in those cases.

All the feminists I know including me think that if men get drafted, so should women. Sounds like you need to meet some actual feminists, like the PP whose POV you just completely ignored to post your hackneyed and ill-informed comment.

Why don’t feminists enlist in the military? The majority of the military is male personnel. Why don’t more women volunteer for service?

Why don’t more men sign up to be kindergarten teachers? The majority of early childhood teachers are women. Why don’t more men volunteer to educate young kids?

You can't wait for everyone to "go first" to make the change you're seeking. Get fit, get disciplined, and get your rifles, ladies.

That’s right. Be the change you want to see in the world. Women don’t have to teach kindergarten, or wait to be drafted. There are recruiting offices in every community. Recruiters are falling short of necessary quotas, the military needs volunteers.

There is no reason why feminists can’t enlist now, to defend freedom.

Males account for about 85% of the Army.
Women make up only 5% of the enlisted Marine Corps.

If you are a woman posting in this thread, why are you not enlisting?

Why aren’t you?

Already have, deployed to the Middle East. Did basic at Ft. Dix NJ and AIT at Ft Sam Houston.

When will you be enlisting?

Just as soon as you sign up to teach kindergartners all day, boo.

It sounds like you're arguing that there may be some innate gender roles that people naturally assort into.

lol, is that what you have arguing about this entire time, moron?

There is no such thing as gender, only sex stereotypes.

Women can enter the military and do many jobs as well as men. Women are smaller and weaker than men and cannot do some physical jobs as well as men. This is biological reality not gender.

Women can, but the majority choose not to do so. Why is that?

One reason may be because they don’t want to be fighting shoulder to shoulder in high risk situations like combat with men who think they shouldn’t be there and in the kitchen instead.

Women are less capable of fighting in combat. They can't carry the bigger loads. They are far more likely to get injured during combat and rucking between operating areas. They also suffer more from the stress of combat. You'd have to an ideologue to think it's a good idea to put woman into combat given all the data.

Quick story: Years ago, the Army asked its soldiers how the physical fitness test should be changed to better measure combat readiness. Pull-ups were resoundingly recommended. Do you know why pull-ups were never added? Because they found that women are so physically weak that they couldn't train their way to doing even 3, so they couldn't create a meaningful line to measure. I could go on about the jokes about the women who are "Ranger-qualified." For your purposes, know that they didn't actually pass the real standards, they were passed so as to make silly feminists happy by cheapening the credential.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

Feminists want equality, except for hard things like national defense. Feminists are ok when things like that are unequal. Feminists are more than happy to let men carry the burden unequally in those cases.

All the feminists I know including me think that if men get drafted, so should women. Sounds like you need to meet some actual feminists, like the PP whose POV you just completely ignored to post your hackneyed and ill-informed comment.

Why don’t feminists enlist in the military? The majority of the military is male personnel. Why don’t more women volunteer for service?

Why don’t more men sign up to be kindergarten teachers? The majority of early childhood teachers are women. Why don’t more men volunteer to educate young kids?

You can't wait for everyone to "go first" to make the change you're seeking. Get fit, get disciplined, and get your rifles, ladies.

That’s right. Be the change you want to see in the world. Women don’t have to teach kindergarten, or wait to be drafted. There are recruiting offices in every community. Recruiters are falling short of necessary quotas, the military needs volunteers.

There is no reason why feminists can’t enlist now, to defend freedom.

Males account for about 85% of the Army.
Women make up only 5% of the enlisted Marine Corps.

If you are a woman posting in this thread, why are you not enlisting?

Why aren’t you?

Already have, deployed to the Middle East. Did basic at Ft. Dix NJ and AIT at Ft Sam Houston.

When will you be enlisting?

Just as soon as you sign up to teach kindergartners all day, boo.

It sounds like you're arguing that there may be some innate gender roles that people naturally assort into.

lol, is that what you have arguing about this entire time, moron?

There is no such thing as gender, only sex stereotypes.

Women can enter the military and do many jobs as well as men. Women are smaller and weaker than men and cannot do some physical jobs as well as men. This is biological reality not gender.

Women can, but the majority choose not to do so. Why is that?

One reason may be because they don’t want to be fighting shoulder to shoulder in high risk situations like combat with men who think they shouldn’t be there and in the kitchen instead.

Women are less capable of fighting in combat. They can't carry the bigger loads. They are far more likely to get injured during combat and rucking between operating areas. They also suffer more from the stress of combat. You'd have to an ideologue to think it's a good idea to put woman into combat given all the data.

Quick story: Years ago, the Army asked its soldiers how the physical fitness test should be changed to better measure combat readiness. Pull-ups were resoundingly recommended. Do you know why pull-ups were never added? Because they found that women are so physically weak that they couldn't train their way to doing even 3, so they couldn't create a meaningful line to measure. I could go on about the jokes about the women who are "Ranger-qualified." For your purposes, know that they didn't actually pass the real standards, they were passed so as to make silly feminists happy by cheapening the credential.

Wait where are we in the argument now?
The evil feminists want to go into combat and ruin the military?
Or
The evil feminists hate America and won’t pull their weight by being in the military.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

Feminists want equality, except for hard things like national defense. Feminists are ok when things like that are unequal. Feminists are more than happy to let men carry the burden unequally in those cases.

What an idiotic post.

Men want equality except for hard things like taking care of children and not committing violent crimes. Men are ok when things like that are unequal. Men are more than happy to let women carry the burden unequally in those cases.

Men don't want equality--that's a feminist's term. Men want men to be men and women to be women. Each sex has a slate of tasks to which it is naturally better suited. Whether the burden is carried equally is a matter of opinion. In fairness to the women, men used to have a significant risk they'd go to war and die. Without that, the old system isn't necessarily "fair."

Stupid. You want to create rigid generalizations and force everyone into them. Treat people as individuals. There are men who are "better suited" to child rearing and women who are not. There are women who are "better suited" to being the breadwinners in a family and men who are not. Stop trying to suffocate people with your rigid beliefs in there only being one way for each gender to live their life. I don't want the slate of tasks you are trying to force on me. It's called freedom and liberty and that is the American way, for us each to choose our own destiny.

Also the reason men have had to go to war and die is because men start wars. Stop starting wars and that won't be the case anymore. Easy peasy.

We are talking policy. Making policy based on exceptions would be horribly inefficient. In a liberal world, we were supposed to make room for the exceptions you describe. Unfortunately, most people are too dumb to understand exceptions and can only only handle simple rules. See, e.g., military structures employed since the Prussians.

We don't have freedom any more in the US. I can't freely associate because that would hurt the feelings of people who are different.

You're right about men starting wars, but women are proving to be warmongers themselves. It's almost like power is the reason people start wars. If you want fewer wars, you should support a reduction in the power of the government. But if you're a woman, it's highly unlikely you'd support such a position.

Why would they? The government freely aids out and e forces exceptions all the time - of which women benefit.

Women complain men want war and hate the patriarchy yet they still support it. All those patriarchal guys are mating and having kids, because there are women who benefit and take advantage of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman here and I see no reason why women shouldn’t be drafted too. It’s not a burden men should carry alone.

Feminists want equality, except for hard things like national defense. Feminists are ok when things like that are unequal. Feminists are more than happy to let men carry the burden unequally in those cases.

All the feminists I know including me think that if men get drafted, so should women. Sounds like you need to meet some actual feminists, like the PP whose POV you just completely ignored to post your hackneyed and ill-informed comment.

Why don’t feminists enlist in the military? The majority of the military is male personnel. Why don’t more women volunteer for service?

Why don’t more men sign up to be kindergarten teachers? The majority of early childhood teachers are women. Why don’t more men volunteer to educate young kids?

You can't wait for everyone to "go first" to make the change you're seeking. Get fit, get disciplined, and get your rifles, ladies.

That’s right. Be the change you want to see in the world. Women don’t have to teach kindergarten, or wait to be drafted. There are recruiting offices in every community. Recruiters are falling short of necessary quotas, the military needs volunteers.

There is no reason why feminists can’t enlist now, to defend freedom.

Males account for about 85% of the Army.
Women make up only 5% of the enlisted Marine Corps.

If you are a woman posting in this thread, why are you not enlisting?

Why aren’t you?

Already have, deployed to the Middle East. Did basic at Ft. Dix NJ and AIT at Ft Sam Houston.

When will you be enlisting?

Just as soon as you sign up to teach kindergartners all day, boo.

It sounds like you're arguing that there may be some innate gender roles that people naturally assort into.

lol, is that what you have arguing about this entire time, moron?

There is no such thing as gender, only sex stereotypes.

Women can enter the military and do many jobs as well as men. Women are smaller and weaker than men and cannot do some physical jobs as well as men. This is biological reality not gender.

Women can, but the majority choose not to do so. Why is that?

One reason may be because they don’t want to be fighting shoulder to shoulder in high risk situations like combat with men who think they shouldn’t be there and in the kitchen instead.

Women are less capable of fighting in combat. They can't carry the bigger loads. They are far more likely to get injured during combat and rucking between operating areas. They also suffer more from the stress of combat. You'd have to an ideologue to think it's a good idea to put woman into combat given all the data.

Quick story: Years ago, the Army asked its soldiers how the physical fitness test should be changed to better measure combat readiness. Pull-ups were resoundingly recommended. Do you know why pull-ups were never added? Because they found that women are so physically weak that they couldn't train their way to doing even 3, so they couldn't create a meaningful line to measure. I could go on about the jokes about the women who are "Ranger-qualified." For your purposes, know that they didn't actually pass the real standards, they were passed so as to make silly feminists happy by cheapening the credential.

Wait where are we in the argument now?
The evil feminists want to go into combat and ruin the military?
Or
The evil feminists hate America and won’t pull their weight by being in the military.

They can still serve in other roles . Don’t be obtuse . The fact they’re willingly ok with being exempt from selective service while their brothers, sons, husbands and fathers die show most women aren’t willing to admit they don’t want equality. They are ok with gender norms when it’s beneficial

[Anonymous]

What’s wrong with sexy ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the joint chiefs 50/50 male /female?
Is 50% of the military leadership female?
If they could show a specific timeline of women engaging in equal leadership and decision making, I would be supportive of girls becoming eligible for the draft.
I’d also need to see that reflected in congress as well.

There plenty of women in these roles in Europe.

Your point appears to be that there are few women in leadership roles, therefore, we should not elect/appoint/promote women to leadership roles.

Can’t argue with that logic.

No. That wasn’t my point.
Enlistment would be a good path for someone of your intellect.

Left also hates enlisted people. Noted.

Just pointing out your options. You aren’t bright enough to teach kindergarten. Digging ditches would be a good possibility .

https://stephenporter.org/iq-by-college-major/

Early childhood education and elementary education are very low on the ranking of average iq by major. You have a nasty and arrogant personality to boot.

So why can’t men hack it?

Hack what? Aren’t most college professors male?

Elementary and High School teachers are mostly women, the majority of college professors are male. What does that tell you?

Hack a 4 year degree. Women are leaving men in the dust.

It’s so funny how Mr. Military is unable to engage with the substance of the article. Lower class men face real challenges that need to be addressed.

Yet he can only post about his military service and more males serve in the military so therefore men are better? Unless you’re enlisted, then you’re stupid.

I know enlisted leukemia who have maters degrees or got out and got educated and well paying jobs .

Goes to show your ignorance and biases .

More to the point, taking out voluntary enlistment, men are the only ones expected to enroll in the selective service . Women are exempt. Why? Because women aren’t capable? Or is it the fact hey can have children and that’s considered an important role? Chances are it’s the second one, but that shows that women are ok with gender roles and norms when it benefits them .

[Anonymous]

Women outlive men by 10 years. The most unfair situation of all and they are still whining about every much smaller discomfort. Men bless their hearts don’t spill their grievances 24-7 like women. Thank God for the stoic character of our male population. They are hero’s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
What’s wrong with sexy ?

Smell the Glove!