Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When does the 'fun' start again?

Now is. I think 5:15-5:20

[Anonymous]

WHo's watching? I couldn't watch all day and have about 30 minutes, I think.

[Anonymous]

I'll be listening while doing stuff in the kitchen.

I'll try not to throw any plates at the wall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All Americans would benefit from exploring and exposing Ukrainian interference and any Biden corruption.

And Trump corruption as well.

No, don't fall for that trap. There is no evidence of Biden corruption. Trump tried to pressure Ukraine into making up evidence, and announcing an investigation that would make it seems as if there might be evidence. But there is *no evidence* - there is PLENTY of evidence about Trump corruption, though, and I look forward to it being explored in depth.

Asking to manufacture the evidence and asking to investigate are two different things. If there are no evidence of any improper behavior by either Bidens, why to worry so much? It would be great for Biden’s campaign to show wrongful allegations, and it will be great for Ukraine to investigate possible foreign corruption. Why Democrats are so opposed to the investigation? If you think Trump improperly requested it, why don’t any of the Democrats or even Biden himself file a proper request?

Vlad, are you the best English speaker they could find? Pathetic.

Let's start investigating Jared and Ivanka as well. If the "what are you hiding defense" is something you think should happen here, then how about Trump release his taxes? He said he would, yet still no.........

[Anonymous]

HA! turns out it resumes at 5:30 which is when I'll be in the kitchen explaining to the kids that this is history and yes, we are watching for awhile.

Then I get to explain why they are using the s word. Should be fun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When does the 'fun' start again?

Now is. I think 5:15-5:20

5:30pm says cspan!

[Anonymous]

The part I don't get is why DevinCow keeps talking about this conspiracy theory when the trump children has violated the emoluments clause all over God's green earth.

Volker, the GOP witness from yesterday, clearly said, multiple times that it's a conspiracy theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are indications of Russian influence. That does not negate Ukrainian influence. Russian influence was investigated and there was no collusion with Trump campaign. That does not mean there was no influence. Ukrainian influence has not been thoroughly investigated, but there are certainly indications of it.

I’m going to surmise that the only reason that there was no [b]evidence of collusion[b] between Russia and the Trump Campaign, is because the EVIDENCE THAT EXISTS HAS NOT BEEN ADMITTED in proceedings due to tie in relevancy. Much like Republicans want to bring in a separate issue of Biden/Burisma that does not legally link to the impeachment hearing per the house rules.

No evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I think Russia hacked the servers, and then tried to bribe both sides. Dem said eff off. GOP said, how much?

You may be correct but this is not how the legal system views it. The evidence may well exist but unless it is conclusively shown to exist, it might as well not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HA! turns out it resumes at 5:30 which is when I'll be in the kitchen explaining to the kids that this is history and yes, we are watching for awhile.

Then I get to explain why they are using the s word. Should be fun.

We were in the car when Sondland told Maloney to respect him. My 10 year old said "This guy is an idiot!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are indications of Russian influence. That does not negate Ukrainian influence. Russian influence was investigated and there was no collusion with Trump campaign. That does not mean there was no influence. Ukrainian influence has not been thoroughly investigated, but there are certainly indications of it.

I’m going to surmise that the only reason that there was no [b]evidence of collusion[b] between Russia and the Trump Campaign, is because the EVIDENCE THAT EXISTS HAS NOT BEEN ADMITTED in proceedings due to tie in relevancy. Much like Republicans want to bring in a separate issue of Biden/Burisma that does not legally link to the impeachment hearing per the house rules.

No evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I think Russia hacked the servers, and then tried to bribe both sides. Dem said eff off. GOP said, how much?

You may be correct but this is not how the legal system views it. The evidence may well exist but unless it is conclusively shown to exist, it might as well not.

This is exactly why people say the justice system is antiquated and unjust. It’s only proxies by people who want to clarify the much. Ugh.

Well, this impeachment will course correct. Believe that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well this is interesting:

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ukrainian-indictment-reveals-hunter-biden-group-made-165-million-mp

I think we will find out that those testifying have a financial stake in their answers and have a lot to lose in these investigations.

Zerohedge is not a credible news source. But let's assume it is a factual story. It doesn't change that the Trump Administration used Congressionally authorized funds to bribe/extort a vulnerable country for personal gain.

All of that is opinion, not fact. What IS fact is that Sondland said straight out that Trump said 'no quid pro quo'. What others feel, i.e. their opinions, is of no never mind.

That was Sondland’s opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All Americans would benefit from exploring and exposing Ukrainian interference and any Biden corruption.

I agree. Since he's squeaky clean, he has no fear of anything under oath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All Americans would benefit from exploring and exposing Ukrainian interference and any Biden corruption.

What evidence do you have of this?

Election interfence is documented.

Biden corruption is circumstantial.

TBD.

Election interference from Ukraine is not documented, is it?

Ask circa 2017 Politico....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All Americans would benefit from exploring and exposing Ukrainian interference and any Biden corruption.

If you watched the testimony today from Amb. Sondland, or understood at all Trump's modus operendi, you would understand that Trump merely wanted the *announcement* of an investigation, not an actual investigation. He wanted the announcement to use against the American public in support of his 2020 campaign. He didn't need an investigation that was going to turn up bubkis.

[Anonymous]

Nines just said (paraphrasing) that Trump wanted to get to the bottom of the truth...Ukraine. He wouldn't know the truth if it bit him in the backside.