Michigan announces ED

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"three institutions—USC, Penn, and Michigan—compete with each other on a regular basis."

I can see that she will now push her client ED UM.

Wharton is T5 level difficulty. Then there is Stern. Ross is on the same level as Caroll BC. Marshall mostly west coast presence.

Ross consistently ranks above Stern.

Stop. No one cares about that stupid US news ranking.

Wharton;
Dyson, Stern, Sloan;
McDonough, Hass;
Ross is below all above.

Most everyone cares.

+100 PP just doesn’t like that Ross is ranked #4, so it is “stupid.”

I just can't understand what's so good about this move.
A public school acting like a private one?
Trying to boost yield and perceived selectivity at the cost of accessibility?

A quality college education is still accessible to Michigan residents. Michigan State has an 84% acceptance rate and has even more students than Michigan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"three institutions—USC, Penn, and Michigan—compete with each other on a regular basis."

I can see that she will now push her client ED UM.

Wharton is T5 level difficulty. Then there is Stern. Ross is on the same level as Caroll BC. Marshall mostly west coast presence.

Ross consistently ranks above Stern.

Stop. No one cares about that stupid US news ranking.

Wharton;
Dyson, Stern, Sloan;
McDonough, Hass;
Ross is below all above.

Most everyone cares.

+100 PP just doesn’t like that Ross is ranked #4, so it is “stupid.”

I just can't understand what's so good about this move.
A public school acting like a private one?
Trying to boost yield and perceived selectivity at the cost of accessibility?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"three institutions—USC, Penn, and Michigan—compete with each other on a regular basis."

I can see that she will now push her client ED UM.

Wharton is T5 level difficulty. Then there is Stern. Ross is on the same level as Caroll BC. Marshall mostly west coast presence.

Ross consistently ranks above Stern.

Stop. No one cares about that stupid US news ranking.

Wharton;
Dyson, Stern, Sloan;
McDonough, Hass;
Ross is below all above.

Most everyone cares.

+100 PP just doesn’t like that Ross is ranked #4, so it is “stupid.”

I just can't understand what's so good about this move.
A public school acting like a private one?
Trying to boost yield and perceived selectivity at the cost of accessibility?

To improve yield. Ask UVA about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"three institutions—USC, Penn, and Michigan—compete with each other on a regular basis."

I can see that she will now push her client ED UM.

Wharton is T5 level difficulty. Then there is Stern. Ross is on the same level as Caroll BC. Marshall mostly west coast presence.

Ross consistently ranks above Stern.

Stop. No one cares about that stupid US news ranking.

Wharton;
Dyson, Stern, Sloan;
McDonough, Hass;
Ross is below all above.

Most everyone cares.

+100 PP just doesn’t like that Ross is ranked #4, so it is “stupid.”

I just can't understand what's so good about this move.
A public school acting like a private one?
Trying to boost yield and perceived selectivity at the cost of accessibility?

+1

Universities talk about finding the right fit and not worrying about rankings.

Then they go ahead and use every trick possible to go higher up in the rankings which they preach us to ignore.

Lying liars!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not surprising considering all of the financial problems Michigan is having.

Its yield this year was crazy and obviously not at all what was expected. The turmoil on campus and long range prospects didn't help.

What do you mean with the yield being "crazy?" The 2024-25 CDS looks like yield was nearly 50% which is very good, correct?

Agree with the turmoil, know of a few families that chose other schools after seeing chaos on accepted students day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"three institutions—USC, Penn, and Michigan—compete with each other on a regular basis."

I can see that she will now push her client ED UM.

Wharton is T5 level difficulty. Then there is Stern. Ross is on the same level as Caroll BC. Marshall mostly west coast presence.

UCLA and Georgia tech both have very low acceptance rates what's wrong with Michigan keeping pace
Ross consistently ranks above Stern.

Stop. No one cares about that stupid US news ranking.

Wharton;
Dyson, Stern, Sloan;
McDonough, Hass;
Ross is below all above.

Most everyone cares.

+100 PP just doesn’t like that Ross is ranked #4, so it is “stupid.”

I just can't understand what's so good about this move.
A public school acting like a private one?
Trying to boost yield and perceived selectivity at the cost of accessibility?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"three institutions—USC, Penn, and Michigan—compete with each other on a regular basis."

I can see that she will now push her client ED UM.

Wharton is T5 level difficulty. Then there is Stern. Ross is on the same level as Caroll BC. Marshall mostly west coast presence.

Ross consistently ranks above Stern.

Stop. No one cares about that stupid US news ranking.

Wharton;
Dyson, Stern, Sloan;
McDonough, Hass;
Ross is below all above.

Most everyone cares.

+100 PP just doesn’t like that Ross is ranked #4, so it is “stupid.”

I just can't understand what's so good about this move.
A public school acting like a private one?
Trying to boost yield and perceived selectivity at the cost of accessibility?

A quality college education is still accessible to Michigan residents. Michigan State has an 84% acceptance rate and has even more students than Michigan.

Michigan State had to boost their acceptance rate because the state of Michigan keeps losing its college age population. Central, Western, and Eastern have lower enrollment levels as a result.

[Anonymous]

Who wants to live in Michigan for four years?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who wants to live in Michigan for four years?

a lot of kids. It’s pretty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who wants to live in Michigan for four years?

Apparently thousands of people

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who wants to live in Michigan for four years?

Apparently thousands of people

Mom, Dad, I want to go to school in the Rust Belt! You can pay private school tuition for a factory school, but you get to brag to all your friends that is is a top school: US News says so. And I will actually get in, because it is an easier admit than actual top schools! Yay! Thanks Mom and Dad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"three institutions—USC, Penn, and Michigan—compete with each other on a regular basis."

I can see that she will now push her client ED UM.

Wharton is T5 level difficulty. Then there is Stern. Ross is on the same level as Caroll BC. Marshall mostly west coast presence.

Ross consistently ranks above Stern.

Stop. No one cares about that stupid US news ranking.

Wharton;
Dyson, Stern, Sloan;
McDonough, Hass;
Ross is below all above.

Most everyone cares.

+100 PP just doesn’t like that Ross is ranked #4, so it is “stupid.”

I just can't understand what's so good about this move.
A public school acting like a private one?
Trying to boost yield and perceived selectivity at the cost of accessibility?

+1

Universities talk about finding the right fit and not worrying about rankings.

Then they go ahead and use every trick possible to go higher up in the rankings which they preach us to ignore.

Lying liars!

At this point, people should disregard everything admissions officers say because, yes, much of it is untrue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who wants to live in Michigan for four years?

Apparently thousands of people

Mom, Dad, I want to go to school in the Rust Belt! You can pay private school tuition for a factory school, but you get to brag to all your friends that is is a top school: US News says so. And I will actually get in, because it is an easier admit than actual top schools! Yay! Thanks Mom and Dad.

There’s a pretty massive difference between Ann Arbor and Gary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who wants to live in Michigan for four years?

Apparently thousands of people

Mom, Dad, I want to go to school in the Rust Belt! You can pay private school tuition for a factory school, but you get to brag to all your friends that is is a top school: US News says so. And I will actually get in, because it is an easier admit than actual top schools! Yay! Thanks Mom and Dad.

There’s a pretty massive difference between Ann Arbor and Gary

Tell Mom and Dad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who wants to live in Michigan for four years?

Apparently thousands of people

Mom, Dad, I want to go to school in the Rust Belt! You can pay private school tuition for a factory school, but you get to brag to all your friends that is is a top school: US News says so. And I will actually get in, because it is an easier admit than actual top schools! Yay! Thanks Mom and Dad.

Yes, we are under no illusions that you are a kid hanging around here instead of doing something more normal with your time.