The New Top LACs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
8. Washington & Lee
9. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
11. Wesleyan
12. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

This tracks with how many Williams/Midd grads leap towards unethical careers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
8. Washington & Lee
9. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
11. Wesleyan
12. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

Where's #7?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
7. Washington & Lee
8. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
10. Wesleyan
11. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.


This tracks with how many Williams/Midd grads leap towards unethical careers

The green eyed monster of jealousy emerges from the shadows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
7. Washington & Lee
8. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
10. Wesleyan
11. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

This tracks with how many Williams/Midd grads leap towards unethical careers

Jealousy suits you well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
7. Washington & Lee
8. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
10. Wesleyan
11. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

This tracks with how many Williams/Midd grads leap towards unethical careers

Jealousy suits you well.

My heart aches with jealousy, claimed by someone who knows nothing about me, my pedigree, nor my background. Thank you sir, for saying what others were to afraid to!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
7. Washington & Lee
8. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
10. Wesleyan
11. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

This tracks with how many Williams/Midd grads leap towards unethical careers

Jealousy suits you well.

My heart aches with jealousy, claimed by someone who knows nothing about me, my pedigree, nor my background. Thank you sir, for saying what others were to afraid to!

I know that you felt free to disparage the academic and career choices of the grads of two of the top schools in the country for absolutely no reason. I know enough to infer that you are either jealous as stated above or just a sorry excuse of a human being. You pick which suits you better and correct me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
7. Washington & Lee
8. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
10. Wesleyan
11. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

This tracks with how many Williams/Midd grads leap towards unethical careers

Jealousy suits you well.

My heart aches with jealousy, claimed by someone who knows nothing about me, my pedigree, nor my background. Thank you sir, for saying what others were to afraid to!

I know that you felt free to disparage the academic and career choices of the grads of two of the top schools in the country for absolutely no reason. I know enough to infer that you are either jealous as stated above or just a sorry excuse of a human being. You pick which suits you better and correct me.

Newsflash, I'm an eph, you fool. I graduated in a time where the excuse wasn't "career needs" for you to get a Williams education and graduate in something besides Econ. Not all of us appreciate the institution's care for math and economics over other subjects in the name of "future fundraising."

I get tired of people like you who can't do anything but propagandize and peddle the same nonsense about the value of a Williams education for finance. You know nothing. The idea of freshman year in Willy hall and anxiously attending intro courses wishing that you could be in a tutorial is something completely foreign to you. You only know Williams from the US news rank, and that is what annoys me--that you wish to talk over an alum who actually cares for the institution because its one of your betting horses for finance outcomes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
7. Washington & Lee
8. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
10. Wesleyan
11. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

This tracks with how many Williams/Midd grads leap towards unethical careers

Jealousy suits you well.

My heart aches with jealousy, claimed by someone who knows nothing about me, my pedigree, nor my background. Thank you sir, for saying what others were to afraid to!

I know that you felt free to disparage the academic and career choices of the grads of two of the top schools in the country for absolutely no reason. I know enough to infer that you are either jealous as stated above or just a sorry excuse of a human being. You pick which suits you better and correct me.

Newsflash, I'm an eph, you fool. I graduated in a time where the excuse wasn't "career needs" for you to get a Williams education and graduate in something besides Econ. Not all of us appreciate the institution's care for math and economics over other subjects in the name of "future fundraising."

I get tired of people like you who can't do anything but propagandize and peddle the same nonsense about the value of a Williams education for finance. You know nothing. The idea of freshman year in Willy hall and anxiously attending intro courses wishing that you could be in a tutorial is something completely foreign to you. You only know Williams from the US news rank, and that is what annoys me--that you wish to talk over an alum who actually cares for the institution because its one of your betting horses for finance outcomes.

Wow, just wow. So you are criticizing fellow Ephs for their career choices. You really didn't help yourself with that response.

I didn't say a word about the world of finance and finance outcomes. I responded to your comment insinuating that a significant portion of Williams and Middlebury grads pursued "unethical" careers. I'm not sure how you spun that into me valuing a Williams education for finance and only knowing Williams from USNWR rankings because nothing could be further from actual fact. I grew up not that far from Williams, my daughter almost went there but made a different choice in the end (she wasn't looking at finance either), and I think that tutorials are an amazing opportunity. I know Williams far better than you know me. I also know that an alum who actually cares doesn't refer to other alum as choosing "unethical" careers for having different interests than yourself. They just don't. So back to my previous question; are you jealous or just a miserable excuse as a human being? Your call.

[Anonymous]

I've said it before, and I'll say it again....

The LAC alumni/parents on DCUM have made me really second guess my previous high-regard for LACs.

Y'all coo coo for Cocoa Puffs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've said it before, and I'll say it again....

The LAC alumni/parents on DCUM have made me really second guess my previous high-regard for LACs.

Y'all coo coo for Cocoa Puffs.

Don't see anything different from the crazy people on the ivy threads. Top schools attract strange, neurotic people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've said it before, and I'll say it again....

The LAC alumni/parents on DCUM have made me really second guess my previous high-regard for LACs.

Y'all coo coo for Cocoa Puffs.

Someone’s kid didn’t get in 🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've said it before, and I'll say it again....

The LAC alumni/parents on DCUM have made me really second guess my previous high-regard for LACs.

Y'all coo coo for Cocoa Puffs.

Someone’s kid didn’t get in 🤣

Yep, I'm just "jealous". LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've said it before, and I'll say it again....

The LAC alumni/parents on DCUM have made me really second guess my previous high-regard for LACs.

Y'all coo coo for Cocoa Puffs.

Someone’s kid didn’t get in 🤣

Yep, I'm just "jealous". LOL

Or you just said something dumb and received the standard DCUM response.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
8. Washington & Lee
9. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
11. Wesleyan
12. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

Dumbest list yet. Get a grip, PP. My cat could make a better list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intellectual LACs are fading as the job market consolidates around STEM and finance. The BRAD schools that lead to Wall Street careers (Bucknell, Richmond, Amherst, Davidson) are rising.

This is elite trolling. I’m not in this camp but suggesting on the board that Richmond is anything other than a diploma mill is heresy. Bucknell not far behind. Including Amherst but not everyone’s favorite Williams is a master stroke. Well done.

And Williams is clearly the best LAC. Go EPHS!

The latest and most definitive ranking of top LACs is out:

1. Middlebury
2. Amherst
3. Williams
4. Claremont/Mudd/Scripps - tie
8. Washington & Lee
9. Pomona/Pitzer - tie
11. Wesleyan
12. Denison

Learfield Directors cup, the only rankings that actually matter.

Dumbest list yet. Get a grip, PP. My cat could make a better list.

Yours might be the dumbest post yet. Why? This list is an actual list based on nothing except objective measurable performance. Nothing subjective about it. Impossible to argue with the list though you might not like the rubric.

Kinda says a lot about all of these rankings that people argue about.