Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Which model has typically been most accurate in past storms (January 2025 or in past years)?
That's a LOADED question, PP
Every meteorologist might have a different opinion.
Some models are better for long range predictions (GFS, Euro) and some are better for short range predictions (NAM).
The truth is, even the best models can be completely wrong sometimes. What we look for is a growing consensus among models as we get closer to game time. Outliers don't generally verify.
Finally, there are lots of things that models still can't predict. For example, we can tell when precipitation might form (early afternoon over DC), but we think there's a pocket of dry air above our region that will absorb that moisture. This means precip onset time does not equal visible snowflakes at eye level! Also, we are concerned about daytime temperatures, which might be too warm to allow for accumulation once the snowflakes do materialize. For both of these reasons, the GFS's double digit totals south of DC are discounted by meteorologists. Apparently this model (which is otherwise pretty good) is having a hard time integrating those factors. Most of the other models are more reasonable.
We'll see who is right tomorrow!